Advertisement

Expert by Experience: Valuing Patient Engagement in Healthcare

  • Yann Le CamEmail author
  • Matthew Bolz-Johnson
Chapter
Part of the Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare book series (OBHC)

Abstract

EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe was established in 1997 to gather all rare diseases at European level to gain visibility and create a new social space, and emerge as a civil society community able to voice the needs and expectations of 30 million people in the 48 European countries. The organization has helped establish most of the 67 disease-specific European Federations or Informal networks. The strategy is a triptych: Patient Empowerment; Patient Engagement; Patient Advocacy. Partnership with stakeholders strengthens the patient’s voice and shapes research, policies and patient services, and the expertise of experience, patient knowledge and contribution to healthcare. In this context, 24 European Reference Networks on rare diseases were established; EURORDIS led the organisation and structuring of patient involvement into these Networks.

Keywords

European Organisation for Rare Diseases, EURORDIS Patient empowerment Patient engagement Patient advocacy Rare diseases European reference networks 

References

  1. Bhattacharya, K., S. Balasubramaniam, Y.S. Choy, et al. 2014. Overcoming the barriers to diagnosis of Morquio A syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 9: 192.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0192-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blöß, S., C. Klemann, A.K. Rother, et al. 2017. Diagnostic needs for rare diseases and shared prediagnostic phenomena: Results of a German-wide expert Delphi survey. PLoS One 12 (2): e0172532.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brett, J., S. Staniszewska, C. Mockford, S. Herron-Marx, J. Hughes, C. Tysall, and R. Suleman. 2014. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations 17: 637–650.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coren, M.E., M. Meeks, I. Morrison, R.M. Buchdahl, and A. Bush. 2002. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: Age at diagnosis and symptom history. Acta Paediatrica 91 (6): 667–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornman, D.H., and White, C.M. 2017. Discerning the perception and impact of patients involved in evidence-based practice center key informant interviews. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Report No.: 17-EHC032-EF. AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care.Google Scholar
  6. European Union Council Recommendation on an action in the field of rare diseases. 2009. June 8. eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:151:0007:0010:EN:PDF.
  7. ——— Volunteer charter. www.eurordis.org/volunteering#tabs-2.
  8. Fønhus, M.S., T.K. Dalsbø, M. Johansen, A. Fretheim, H. Skirbekk, and S.A. Flottorp. 2018. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11 (9): CD012472.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta, D., C.G. Lis, and M. Rodeghier. 2013. Can patient experience with service quality predict survival in colorectal cancer? Journal for Healthcare Quality 35: 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, D., M. Rodeghier, and C.G. Lis. 2014. Patient satisfaction with service quality as a predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 22: 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallal, C., C.O. Kieling, D.L. Nunes, C.T. Ferreira, G. Peterson, S.G. Barros, C.A. Arruda, J.C. Fraga, and H.A. Goldani. 2012. Diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and associated diseases of achalasia in children and adolescents: A twelve-year single center experience. Pediatric Surgery International 28 (12): 1211–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3214-3. Epub 2012 Nov 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanna, E., C. Rémuzat, P. Auquier, and M. Toumi. 2017. Gene therapies development: Slow progress and promising prospect. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 5 (1): 1265293. Published 2017 Jan 3.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1265293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rath, A., V. Salamon, S. Peixoto, V. Hivert, M. Laville, B. Segrestin, E.A.M. Neugebauer, M. Eikermann, V. Bertele, S. Garattini, J. Wetterslev, R. Banzi, J.C. Jakobsen, S. Djurisic, C. Kubiak, J. Demotes-Mainard, and C. Gluud. 2017. A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: What are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome? Trials 18 (1): 556.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2287-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharma, A.E., M. Knox, V.L. Mleczko, and J.N. Olayiwola. 2017. The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 17 (1): 693.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2630-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tokhi, M., L. Comrie-Thomson, J. Davis, A. Portela, M. Chersich, and S. Luchters. 2018. Involving men to improve maternal and newborn health: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. PLoS One 13 (1): e0191620.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191620. eCollection 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EurordisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations