Advertisement

Approaches to Facelifting

  • Danny J. SoaresEmail author
  • William E. Silver
Chapter

Abstract

The evolution of the cervicofacial rhytidectomy spans more than 110 years, witnessing many successes and failures along the way and yielding the variety of facelift techniques available today. In this chapter, we review the key features and differences between the most common and well-established techniques in facelifting, including conventional SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) techniques such as the lateral-SMASectomy and extended-SMAS procedures such as the deep plane and high-SMAS rhytidectomy techniques. At the core of understanding the differences between these varied facelift types lies a comprehensive understanding of facial anatomy and the facial aging process. In this chapter, the history of facelifting, surgical approaches, and complications pertaining to this iconic surgery are discussed.

Keywords

Rhytidectomy Facial anatomy History of facelifting Facelift approaches Facelift complications 

Technical Terms and Abbreviation

RSTLs

Relaxed skin tension lines SMAS Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System

References

  1. 1.
    Leal Silva HG. Facial laxity rating scale validation study. Dermatol Sure. 2016;42(12):1370–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Yuan C, Ayedelotte JD, Cuellar FJ, Cochran CS, et al. Concertina effect and facial aging: nonlinear aspects of youthfulness and skeletal remodeling, and why, perhaps. Infants Have Jowls Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(2):635–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mendelson B, Wong C-H. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Kahn DM, Girotto JA, Langstein HN. Aging of the mandible and its aesthetic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):332–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donofrio LM. Fat distribution: a morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(12):1107–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2219–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ascher B, Coleman S, Alster T, Bauer U, Burgess C, Butterwick K, et al. Full scope of effect of facial lipoatrophy: a framework of disease understanding. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(8):1058–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pallua N, Wolter T. The Lipo-facelift: merging the face-lift and Liposculpture: eight years experience and a preliminary observational study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;37(6):1107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glogau RG. Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996;15(3):134–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lexer E. In: Barth JA, editor. Die gesamte Wiederherslellung schiurgie, vol. 2. Leipzig; 1931. p. 548.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollander E. Cosmetic surgery. In: Joseph M, editor. Handbuch der Kosmetik. Leipzig: Veriag von Velt; 1912. p. 688.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joseph J. Hangewangenplastik (melomioplastik). Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1921;47:287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourget J. La disparitionchiurgicale des rides etplis du visage. Bull Acad Med Paris. 1919;82:183.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Passot R. La chirurgieesthetique des rides du visages. Presse Med. 1919;27:258.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noel A. La Chirurgieesthetique: Son Role Social. Paris: Masson et Cite; 1926.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bames OH. Truth and fallacies of face peeling and face lifting. Med J Rec. 1927:126–86.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burian F. Zur Technik der Gesichtshautspannung. Med Welt. 1936;10:930.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seltzer AP. Reconstructive surgery for the elderly. Geriatrics. 1952;7(3):185–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson JB. The problem of the aging face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;15(2):117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonzales-Ulloa M. The creation of aesthetic plastic surgery [book on the internet]. New York: Springer; 1985. Chapter 3: The history of rhytidectomy; p. 46–90. Available from: SpringerLink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skoog T. “Chapter XIII: The Aging Face”. Plastic surgery: new methods. Saunders: Philadelphia; 1974. p. 328–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Webster RC, Smith RC, Papsidero MJ, Karolow WW, Smith KF. Comparison of SMAS plication with smas imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope. 1982;92(8 Pt 1):901–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barton FE Jr. The SMAS and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(6):1054–7; discussion 1058–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamra ST. The deep-plane Rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53–61; discussion 62–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamra ST. The tri-plane face lift dissection. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12(3):268–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamra ST. Commentary on: total composite flap facelift and the deep-plane transition zone: a critical consideration in SMAS-release midface lifting. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(5):546–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barton FE. The “high SMAS” facelift technique. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(5):481–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tessier P. Le lifting facial sous-perioste. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34(3):193–7. French.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Psillakis JM, Rumley TO, Camargos A. Subperiosteal approach on an improved concept for correction of the aging face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(3):383–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Santana PM. Craniofacial methods in rhytidectomy. Cir Plast Iberolatinoamer. 1984;10:322–8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramirez OM, Maillard GF, Musolas A. The extended subperiosteal face lift: a definitive soft tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(2):227–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Saint Cyr BC, Maillard GC, Scheflan M, Ramirez O. The subperiosteal lift. Aesth Plast Surg. 1993;17(2):151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Quatela VC, Jacono AA. The extended centrolateral endoscopic midface lift. Facial Plast Surg. 2003;19(2):199–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hamra ST. Composite Rhytidectomy. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1993.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35(4):569–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marten TJ. Lamellar high SMAS face and mid-face lift. In: Nahai F, editor. The art of aesthetic surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2005. p. 1110–93.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maliniak JW. Is the surgical restoration of the aged face justified? Med J Rec. 1932;135:321–4.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Millard DR, Garst WP, Beck RL. Submental and submandibular lipectomy in conjunction with a face-lift in the female and male. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49(4):385–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Guerrero-Santos J, Espaillat L, Morales F. Muscular lift in cervical rhytidoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;54(2):127–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Connell BF. Contouring the neck in rhytidectomy by lipectomy and muscle sling. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(3):376–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aston SJ. Platysma muscle in rhytidoplasty. Annals Plast Surg. 1979;3(6):529–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Connell BC. Cervical lifts: the value of platysma muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 1978;1(1):32–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(3):333–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mittelman H, Spencer JR, Chrzanowski DS. Chin region: management of grooves & mandibular hypoplasia with alloplastic implant. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2007;15(4):445–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(6):481–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baker DC, Stefani WA, Chiu ES. Reducing the incidence of hematoma requiring surgical evacuation following male rhytidectomy: a 30-year review of 985 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(7):1973–85; discussion 1986–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kamer FM, Song AU. Hematoma formation in deep plane rhytidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(4):240–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Berner RE, Morain WD, Noe JM. Postoperative hypertension as an etiological factor in hematoma after rhytidectomy. Prevention with chlorpromazine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57(3):314–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spotnitz WD. Efficacy and safety of fibrin sealant for tissue adherence in facial rhytidectomy. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:43–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weissman O, Farber N, Remer E, Tessone A, Trivizki O, Bank J, et al. Post-facelift flap necrosis treatment using charged polystyrene microspheres. Can J Plast Surg. 2013;21(1):45–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rees A, Aston SJ. Complications of rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 1978;5(1):109–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kruper GJ, VandeGriend ZP, Lin H-S, Zuliani GF. Salvage of failed local and regional flaps with porcine urinary bladder extracellular matrix aided tissue regeneration. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:917183.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kimmel H, Rahn M, Gilbert TW. The clinical effectiveness in wound healing with extracellular matrix derived from porcine urinary bladder matrix: a case series on severe chronic wounds. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec. 2010;2(3):55–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Robertson SA, Jeevaratnam JA, Agrawal A, Cutress RI. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017;9:141–52.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Francis A, Baynosa RC. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the compromised graft or flap. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017;6(1):23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Payne DL. Facial nerve deficits following face lift surgery. Am J Otol. 1992;13(1):91–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Liebman EP, Webster RC, Gaul JR, Griffin T. The marginal mandibular nerve in rhytidectomy and liposuction surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(2):179–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kamer FM. One hundred consecutive deep plane face lifts. Arch Otol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(1):17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Clark RP, Berris CE. Botulinum toxin: a treatment for facial asymmetry caused by facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84(2):353–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    LeRoy JL Jr, Rees TD, Nolan WB III. Infections requiring hospital readmission following face lift surgery: incidence, treatment, and sequelae. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(3):533–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shah VV, Aldahan AS, Mlacker S, Alsaidan M, Samarkandy S, Nouri K. 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: a comprehensive review of the literature. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016;6(2):169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tholen RH. Pulsed dye laser treatment of hypertrophic scars. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 1996;16(2):92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kono T, Erçöçen A, Nakazawa H, Nozaki M. Treatment of hypertrophic scars using a long-pulsed dye laser with cryogen-spray cooling. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(5):487–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Drost BH, van de Langenberg R, Manusama OR, Janssens AS, Sikorska K, Zuur CL, et al. Dermatography (medical tattooing) for scars and skin grafts in head and neck patients to improve appearance and quality of life. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;19(1):16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Perez CF, Gaball CW. Functional and aesthetic tragal reconstruction in the age of mobile electronic devices. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2016;2016:2591705.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Choucair RJ, Hamra ST. Extended superficial musculaponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plastics Surg. 2008;35(4):607–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lambros V, Stuzin JM. The cross-cheek depression: surgical cause and effect in the development of the “joker line” and its treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1543–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hoefflin SM. Simple repair of pixie earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(6):1623–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gonzales-Ulloa M. The history of rhytidectomy. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1980;4(1):1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Central Florida College of MedicineOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Mesos Plastic and Laser SurgeryLady LakeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Atlanta Institute for Facial Aesthetic SurgeryAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations