Advertisement

Dissolution Process: When Does the Process Start

  • Silvana MagniEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Karst Science book series (AKS)

Abstract

Dissolution process is a complex phenomenon controlled by several factors as like lithology, porosity, stress orientation, environmental conditions and networks of fractures. Then, fault zone and fractures play an important role in fluid circulation and in dissolution, acting as barriers or conduits. In fact, the fault zone has a high permeability only in the early stages of the movement, but shortly the process of recrystallization and reprecipitation reduces the permeability greatly within them. Despite this, traditionally (Cucchi and Forti in In Att. e Mem. Comm. Grotte “E: Boegan” 87–93, 1988; Bini et al. in Varese Lake and the Quaternary 6:3–14, 1993; Ferrarese and Meneghel in Aspetti dell’influenza strutturale sulla morfogenesi carsica del Montello (Treviso), 45–59, 1992), the dissolution is associated with extensional structures such as faults and joints believing that they are more favorable to the water circulation. In this context, compressional tectonic structures, as like stylolites, are never been taken into consideration. In fact, the stylolites play an important role in the fluid circulation (Alsharhan and Sadd in U.A.E., Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publicatio, 185–207 2000; Raynaud in J Struct Geol, 973–980, 1992) and in particular in the incipit of dissolution and then of the karst. The focus of the research is to investigate the starting point of the dissolution and the micromechanisms that act in the fluid/rock system. To achieve this, we performed: field work, labs analysis. The field work was carried out in a karst area in the South Italy (Alte Murge). Through a detailed structural analysis in the field and using the method of Caine (Caine et al. in Geology 1025–1028, 1996), we reconstructed the permeability of the fault zone. Our attention was focused on faults, joints and stylolites. To support the field observations we had carried out, chemical and petrographic analysis (XRD, FTIR, SEM), that are helping us to characterize the porosity and permeability near these structures. Recently, fluid/rock interactions and their impact on carbonate rocks are becoming very important as a consequence of a progressive deterioration of the quantity and quality of the groundwater due to increasing pollution phenomena. In fact, the aquifers represent about 40% of the drinking water resources and their importance will increase in coming years.

Keywords

Dissolution Fluid/rock interaction Permeability Stylolites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank my Supervisor, Prof. Cees Passchier, for his support and helpful advices and, in addition, thank Dr. Mark Peternell for his collaboration on this research.

Very helpful and interesting were the discussions with Prof. Piotr Szymczak (University of Warsaw) that helped me to focus better on the still unclear aspect of dissolution.

I also want to thank Prof. Francois Renard (University of Grenoble) for interesting discussions and his availability to give me very helpful advices.

References

  1. Alsharhan & Sadd. U.A.E, Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication (69), 185–207 (2000).Google Scholar
  2. Aydin, A.: Fractures, faults, and hydrocarbon entrapment, migration and flow. Marine and Petroleum Geology (17), 797–814 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bini A., Rigamonti I., Ogier A.: Evidence of recent tectonics in the plane Monte Campo dei Fiori, Varese Lake and the Quaternary 6 (1), 3–14 (1993).Google Scholar
  4. Caine J., Evans J., Forester C.: Architecture fault zone structure and permeability. Geology (11), 1025–1028 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cucchi F., Forti F.: La stazione di misura della dissoluzione superficiale a Borgo Grotta Gigante. In Att. e Mem. Comm. Grotte “E: Boegan” (27), 87–93 (1988).Google Scholar
  6. Ebner M., Koehn D., Toussaint R., Renard F., Schmittbuhl J.: Stress sensitivity of stylolite morphology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277(3–4), 94–398 (2009a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrarese F., Meneghel M.: Aspetti dell’influenza strutturale sulla morfogenesi carsica del Montello (Treviso). In Atti e Memorie Commissione Grotte Eugenio Boegan (4), 45–59 (1992).Google Scholar
  8. Forti P., Piccini L.: The Karst process. Società Speleologica Italiana. Project PPT 2007 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. Gratier J.-P., Muquet L., Hassani R., Renard F.: Experimental microstylolites in quartz and modeled application to natural stylolitic structures. Journal of Structural Geology (27), 89–100 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koehn D., Renard F., Toussaint R., Passchier C.W.: Growth of stylolite teeth patterns depending on normal stress and finite compaction. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 257 (3–4), 582–595 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koehn D., Ebner M., Renard F., Toussaint R., Passchier C.W.: Modelling of stylolite geometries and stress scaling. Earth and Planetary Science Letters (341), 104–113 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koehn D., Rood M.P., Beaudoin N., Chung P., Bons P.D., Gomez Rivas E.: A new stylolite classification scheme to estimate compaction and local permeability variations. Sedimentary Geology (346), 60–71 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Menichetti M.: Evoluzione spaziale e temporale del sistema carsico del Monte Cucco nell’Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano. In Atti XV Congress. Naz. Spel 1987, 731–762 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. Menichetti M., Galdenzi S.: Il carsismo della Gola di Frasassi. Mem. Ist. It. Spel., Vol. 4(2), 65–92 (1992).Google Scholar
  15. Piccini L.: Geomorfologia e Speleogenesi carsica. Quaderno didattico della Società Speleologica Italiana n°1, 40 (1999).Google Scholar
  16. Park W. C., Schot E. H.: Stylolites: their nature and origin. Journal of sedimentary Petrology 38(1); 175–191 (1968).Google Scholar
  17. Raynaud S.: Rock matrix structures in a zone influenced by a stylolite. Journal of Structural Geology (14), 973–980 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Renard F., Schmittbuhl J., Gratier J.-P., Meakin P., Merino n E.; Three-dimensional roughness of stylolites in limestones. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth (109), 1–12 (2004).Google Scholar
  19. Shanov S., Kostov K. Dynamic Tectonics and Karst. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 123, (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tognini P.: Analisi strutturale della Valle del Nosè in relazione alla carsificazione profonda. Tesi di laurea anno 1993–1994 Relatore: Prof. A. Bini; Correlatore Dott. G.B. Siletto. (1994).Google Scholar
  21. Vigna B., Calandri G.: Gli acquiferi carbonatici. In quaderni didattici della Società Speleologica Italiana. Erga Edizioni Genova, pp 48 (2001).Google Scholar
  22. Zhou, X. and Aydin, A.: Mechanism of pressure solution seam growth and evolution: Journal of Geophysical Research (115) B12207, 10.1029 (2010).Google Scholar
  23. Quinif Y., Vandycke S.: Karst and tectonics. Geologica Belgica volume 4 (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Mainz-Institute of GeosciencesMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations