Advertisement

The History and Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950–2017

  • Erik ThorbeckeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter examines the history and evolution of development doctrine. It suggests that the selection and adoption of a development strategy depend upon three building blocks: (1) the prevailing development objectives which, in turn, are derived from the prevailing view and definition of the development process; (2) the conceptual state of the art regarding the existing body of development theories, hypotheses, models, techniques, and empirical applications; and (3) the underlying data system available to diagnose the existing situation, measure performance, and test hypotheses. Development doctrine is then defined as the body of principles and knowledge resulting from the interrelated complex of these four elements that is accepted by the Development Community at that time. This analytical framework is applied to describe the state of the art that prevailed in each of the five decades (from the 1950s to the 1990s) and in the most recent period 2000 to 2017 to highlight in a systematic fashion the changing conception of the development process. Over the last 67 years the definition of development and strategies to achieve it, progressed and broadened from the maximization of GDP in the 1950s, to employment creation and the satisfaction of basic needs in the 1970s, to structural adjustment and stabilization in the 1980s and early 1990s, to poverty reduction, followed by sustainable and shared growth that dominated the scene until recently. The evolution in the conception of development culminated with the present broad-based concept of inclusive and sustainable growth. A parallel and similar progression occurred in development theory and in the coverage, comprehensiveness and quality of data and information. While development economics has followed a time path towards more experimental, multidisciplinary and more rigorous and scientific methodology, the present emphasis on microeconomic phenomena and randomized and controlled trials may have detracted researchers from exploring fundamental “big picture” macroeconomic phenomena.

Keywords

History of development economics Evolution of development doctrine Shifting development objectives History of development theories 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001, December). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Addison, T., Morrissey, O., & Tarp, F. (2017). The macroeconomics of aid; overview. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(7), 987–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adelman, I., & Morris, C. (1967). Society, politics and economic development: A quantitative approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  5. Adelman, I., & Robinson, S. (1978). Income distribution policy in the developing countries: A case study of Korea. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality. What can be done? Cambridge, MA/London, UK: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azariadis, C., & Stachurski, J. (2005). Poverty traps. In P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf eds. Handbook of economic growth. North Holland.Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., Glennester, R., & Kothari, D. (2010). Improving immunization coverage in rural India: Clustered randomized controlled evaluation of immunization campaigns with and without incentives. BMJ. 2010; 340: c2220.Google Scholar
  11. Bardhan, P. K. (1989). The economic theory of agrarian institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bardhan, P. K. (2005). Institutions matter, but which ones? Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 13(3), 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basu, K. (2013). The method of randomization and the role of reasoned intuition. Policy research working paper (No. WPS 6722). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  14. Basu, K. (2015). An economist in the real world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bates M. A., & Glennerster, R. (2017). The generalizability puzzle, Stanford Social Innovation Review. Summer 2017, online journal available at https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_generalizability_puzzle
  16. Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, M. R., & Barrett, C. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chenery, H. B. (1953). Application of investment criteria. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67(February), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chenery, H. B. (1960). Patterns of industrial growth. American Economic Review, 50(4), 624–654.Google Scholar
  21. Chenery, H. B., & Taylor, L. (1968). Development patterns: Among countries and over time. Review of Economics and Statistics, 50(4), 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chenery, H. B., Ahluwalia, M. S., Bell, C. L. G., Duloy, J. H., & Jolly, R. (Eds.). (1974). Redistribution with growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cornia, G., Jolly, R., & Stewart, F. (1987). Adjustment with a human face: Protecting the vulnerable and promoting growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., & Thorbecke, E. (1993). Introduction to state, market, and civil organizations: New theories, new practices, and their implications for rural development. World Development, 21(4), 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 424–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2016). The limitations of randomized controlled trials. VOX: CPR’s Policy Portal.Google Scholar
  27. Dervis, K., de Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for developing countries. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D., & Younger, S. (2006). Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. Economic Journal. 116(514), 943–968.Google Scholar
  29. Duflo, E., & Banerjee, A. (2017). Handbook of field experiments. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  30. Duflo, E., & Kremer, M. (2003). Use of randomization in the evaluation of development effectiveness. Paper prepared for the World Bank operations evaluation department conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Eckstein, A. (1957). Investment criteria for economic development and the theory of Intertemporal welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(1), 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fei, J. C. H., & Ranis, G. (1964). Development of the labor surplus economy. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
  33. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52, 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Galenson, W., & Leibenstein, H. (1955). Investment criteria, productivity and economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(3), 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guillaumont, P., & Chavet, L. (2001). Aid and performance: A reassessment. Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2001). Aid and growth regressions. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris, J., & Todaro, M. (1970). Migration, unemployment & development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.Google Scholar
  38. Heckman, J. J. (2010). Building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 356–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hunt, D. (1989). Economic theories of development: An analysis of comparative paradigms. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester and Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  41. ILO. (1973). Employment, income and equality: A strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  42. Imbens, G. (2010). Better late than nothing. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnston, B. F., & Kilby, P. (1975). Agriculture and structural transformation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kahn, A. E. (1951). Investment criteria in development programs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanbur, R. (Ed.). (2004). Q-Squared: Qualitative and quantitative methods of poverty appraisal. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
  46. Kanbur R., & Schaeffer, P. (Eds.). (2007). Experiences of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to poverty analysis. World Development Special Issue, 35(2), 183–354.Google Scholar
  47. Kim, J. I., & Lau, L. J. (1994). The sources of economic growth of east-Asian newly industrialized countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8(3), 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krugman, P. R. (1994). The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Leibenstein, H. (1957). Economic backwardness and economic growth. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22(2), 139–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lindauer, D. L., & Pritchett, L. (2002). What’s the big idea? The third generation of policies for economic growth. Economia, 3(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  53. Little, I. M. D., & Mirrlees, J. (1974). Project appraisal and planning for developing countries. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mookherjee, D. (2005), Is there too Little theory in development economics today? Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 40, No. 40 (Oct. 1–7, 2005), pp. 4328–4333.Google Scholar
  56. Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  57. Nabli, M. K., & Nugent, J. B. (1989). The new institutional economics and its applicability to development. World Development, 17(9), 1333–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ndulu, B., O’Connell, S. A., Bates, R. H., Collier, P., & Soludu, C. C. (2008). The political economy of economic growth in Africa, 1960–2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nissanke, M., & Thorbecke, E. (2006). Channels and policy debate in the globalization-inequality-poverty Nexus. World Development, 34(8), 1338–1360.Google Scholar
  60. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nurkse, R. (1953). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Pant, P. (1974). Perspective of development: 1961–1976. Implications for planning for a minimum level of living. In T. N. Srinivasan & P. K. Bardhan (Eds.), Poverty and income distribution in India. Calcutta: Statistical Publishing Society.Google Scholar
  63. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1990). Macroeconomic policy, credibility, and politics. New York/Melbourne: Hardwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Ravallion, M. (2012). Why don’t we see poverty convergence? American Economic Review, 102(1), 504–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ray, D. (2000). What is new in development economics? The American Economist, 44, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, part 2), S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. M. (1943). Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53(210), 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rostow, W. W. (1956). The take-off into self-sustained growth. Economic Journal, 66(March), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruttan, V. W. (1996). United States development assistance policy: The domestic politics of foreign economic aid. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sachs, J. D. (2006). The end of poverty. London, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  72. Sahn, D. E., Dorosh, P., & Younger, S. (1996). Exchange rate, fiscal and agricultural policies in Africa: Does adjustment hurt the poor? World Development, 24(4), 719–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  74. The Lancet. (2004). The World Bank is finally embracing science: Editorial. The Lancet, 364, 731–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thorbecke, E. (Ed.). (1969). The role of agriculture in economic development. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Thorbecke, E. (1991). Adjustment, growth and income distribution in Indonesia. World Development, 19(11), 1595–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thorbecke, E. (1993). Impact of state and civil institutions on the operation of rural market and non-market configurations. World Development, 21(4), 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thorbecke, E. (2006). Economic development, equality, income distribution and ethics. In M. Altmann (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: Foundations and developments. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  79. Thorbecke, E., & Charumilind, C. (2002). Economic inequality and its socioeconomic impact. World Development, 39(2), 1477–1495.Google Scholar
  80. Timmer, P. C. (2015). Food security and scarcity: Why ending hunger is so hard. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tsui, K. Y. (2002). Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discreet structural alternatives (Working paper). Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Reform.Google Scholar
  83. World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  84. World Bank. (2005). World development report: Equity and development. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  85. Young, A. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East-Asian Growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations