Advertisement

Phycoremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Polluted Sites: Application, Challenges, and Future Prospects

  • Pankaj Kumar Gupta
  • Shashi Ranjan
  • Sanjay Kumar Gupta
Chapter

Abstract

Impoverished communities everywhere in the world face challenges with respect to the treatment of wastewater. In particular, rural areas and remote communities with low socioeconomic conditions may lack conventional centralized wastewater treatment systems. As a result, in many instances, wastewater may be disposed without appropriate treatment, thus contaminating drinking water resources. Even if the communities choose a minimal effort and cost system for wastewater treatment, existing decontamination techniques do not provide complete reduction in biodegradable organic materials, pathogens, nutrients, etc., from the wastewater. Particularly, wastewater containing petrochemical hydrocarbons is of major concern under varying climatic conditions because of their high sensitivity to subsurface variability, which enables the pollutants to spread widely. Thus, engineered bioremediation is a promising cost-effective technique that is widely used to accelerate degradation and biotransformation of different pollutants. Phycoremediation is a technique using algae through various mechanisms for pollutant removal or biotransformation that includes nutrients, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides. In addition to the removal of pollutants, this mechanism yields algal biomass as an interesting raw material for a diversity of valuable products and biofuel. In this book chapter, we give a comprehensive compilation of existing knowledge and future prospects of algal application in remediation of petrochemical hydrocarbon pollution. Further, this chapter discusses the biogeochemical pathway leading to degradation of petrochemical-polluted soils and groundwater using phycoremediation techniques. The emphasis of the chapter is on present practical applications and the technological constraints to employing sustainable methods. The knowledge pool of this chapter will help in applying decontamination techniques to petrochemical-polluted wastewater and the soil–water system.

Keywords

Petrochemical pollutants Phycoremediation Groundwater resources Practical and technological constraints 

References

  1. Abhishek GPK, Yadav BK, Amandeep TAS, Kataria S, Kumar S (2018a) Phytoremediation of toluene polluted groundwater under nutrient loading using constructed wetlands. poster presentation (B33G-2766) in AGU Fall Meeting 2018 held in Washington DC, USA during 10–14 Dec 2018Google Scholar
  2. Abhishek YBK, Gupta PK (2018b) Morphological variations in unsaturated porous media due to LNAPL contamination. Poster in Japan Geoscience Union (JpGU) Chiba-city, Japan, May 20–24 2018Google Scholar
  3. Allgaier M, Riebesell U, Vogt M, Thyrhaug R, Grossart HP (2008) Coupling of heterotrophic bacteria to phytoplankton bloom development at different pCO2 levels: a mesocosm study. Biogeosciences 5:1007–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Turki AI (2009) Microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation in soil. Res J Environ Toxicol 3:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin SA, Green DH, Hart MC, Küpper FC, Sunda WG, Carrano CJ (2009) Photolysis of iron-siderophore chelates promotes bacterial-algal mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17071–17076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnot JA, Mackay D, Parkerton TF, Zaleski RT, Warren CS (2010) Multimedia modeling of human exposure to chemical substances: the roles of food web biomagnification and biotransformation. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayolabi EA, Folorunso AF, Kayode OT (2013) Integrated geophysical and geochemical methods for environmental assessment of municipal dumpsite system. Int J Geosci 4:850–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azubuike CC, Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC (2016) Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Babu M (2011) Effect of algal biofilm and operational conditions on nitrogen removal in wastewater stabilization ponds. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen University, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu S, Yadav BK, Mathur S (2015) Enhanced bioremediation of BTEX contaminated groundwater in pot-scale wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(24):20041–20049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burken JG, Schnoor JL (1998) Predictive relationships for uptake of organic contaminants by hybrid poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 32(21):3379–3385.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es9706817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caliman FA, Robu BM, Smaranda C, Pavel VL, Gavrilescu M (2011) Soil and groundwater cleanup: benefits and limits of emerging technologies. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13(2):241–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlsson AS, van Beilen JB, Möller R, Clayton D (2007) Micro- and macro-algae: utility for industrial applications. In: Bowles D (ed) Outputs from the EPOBIO: Realising the economic potential of sustainable resources – bioproducts from non-food crops project. CNAP, University of YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Cerniglia CE, Gibson DT, van Baalen C (1979) Algal oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons: formation of 1-naphthol from naphthalene by Agmenellum quadruplicatum, strain PR-6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 88:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerniglia CE, Gibson DT, van Baalen C (1980a) Oxidation of naphthalene by cyanobacteria and microalgae. J Gen Microbiol 116:495–500Google Scholar
  16. Cerniglia CE, van Baalen C, Gibson DT (1980b) Metabolism of naphthalene by the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria sp., strain JCM. J Gen Microbiol 116:485–494Google Scholar
  17. Cottin N, Merlin G (2008) Removal of PAHs from laboratory columns simulating the humus upper layer of vertical flow constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 73:711–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Croft MT, Lawrence AD, Raux-Deery E, Warren MJ, Smith AG (2005) Algae acquire vitamin B12 through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria. Nature 438:90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Jaeger L, Verbeek REM, Draaisma RB (2014) Superior triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in starchless mutants of Scenedesmus obliquus: (I) mutant generation and characterization. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2010) Immobilized microalgae for removing pollutants: review of practical aspects. Bioresour Technol 101:1611–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobson R, Schroth MH, Zeyer J (2007) Effect of water-table fluctuation on dissolution on and biodegradation of a multi-component, light nonaqueous-phase liquid. J Contam Hydrol 94:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dzantor EK (2007) Phytoremediation: the state of rhizosphere “engineering” for accelerated rhizodegradation of xenobiotic contaminants. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82(3):228–232.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Essaid HI, Bekins BA, Cozzarelli IM (2015) Organic contaminant transport and fate in the subsurface: evolution of knowledge and understanding. Water Resour Res 51(7):4861–4902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandez SJ, Ceron GM, Sanchez MA (2004) Pilot-plant-scale outdoor mixotrophic cultures of Phaeodactylum tricornutum using glycerol in vertical bubble column and airlift photobioreactors: studies in fed-batch mode. Biotechnol Prog 20:728–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fijani E, Nadiri AA, Moghaddam AA, Tsai FTC, Dixon B (2013) Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer, Iran. J Hydrol 503:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuentes S, Méndez V, Aguila P, Seeger M (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4781–4794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta PK, Joshi P (2017) Assessing groundwater resource vulnerability by coupling GIS based DRASTIC and solute transport model in Ajmer District, Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India (Springer).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-0958-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta PK, Yadav BK, Hassanizadeh SM (2017) Engineered bioremediation of LNAPL polluted soil-water resources under changing climatic conditions. Proceedings of international conference on modeling of environmental and water resources systems (ICMEWRS-2017), HBTU Kanpur, 24–26th March, 2017 (ISBN 978-93-85926-53-2)Google Scholar
  29. Gupta PK, Yadav BK (2017a) Role of climatic variability on fate and transport of LNAPL pollutants in subsurface. Session H060: groundwater response to climate change and variability, AGU fall meeting 2017, New Orleans, USA. (Abstract ID: 220494)Google Scholar
  30. Gupta PK, Yadav BK (2017b) Chapter 8: Effects of climatic variation on dissolution of LNAPL pollutants in subsurface environment. In: Climate change resource conservation and sustainability strategies. DBH Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi. isbn:9789384871086Google Scholar
  31. Gupta PK, Sharma D (2018) Assessments of hydrological and hydro-chemical vulnerability of groundwater in semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, India. Sustain Water Resour Manag:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0260-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta PK, Abhishek YBK (2018a) Chapter 5: Impact of hydrocarbon pollutants on partially saturated soil media in batch system: morphological analysis using SEM techniques. In: Water quality management. Water science and technology library, vol 79. Springer. isbn:978-981-10-5794-6Google Scholar
  33. Gupta PK, Ranjan S, Kumar D (2018b) Chapter 2: Groundwater pollution by emerging industrial pollutants and its remediation techniques. In: Recent advances in environmental management, vol 1. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. isbn:9780815383147Google Scholar
  34. Gupta PK, Yadav B, Yadav BK (2018c) Transport of LNAPL and biofilm growth in subsurface under dynamic groundwater conditions. C001723-Oral presentation in Japan Geoscience Union (JpGU) Chiba-city, Japan, May 20–24 2018Google Scholar
  35. Gupta PK, Yadav B, Yadav BK (2019) Assessment of LNAPL in subsurface under fluctuating groundwater table using 2D sand tank experiments. ASCE J Environ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001560
  36. Gupta PK, Yadav BK (2019) Subsurface processes controlling reuse potential of treated wastewater under climate change conditions. In: Water conservation, recycling and reuse: issues and challenges. Springer, Singapore, pp 147–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gupta PK, Yadav BK (2017) Bioremediation of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) polluted soil-water resources Chapter 8. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  38. Gupta PK, Shashi R, Yadav BK, (2013) BTEX biodegradation in soil-water system having different substrate concentrations. Int J Eng 2(12):1765–1772Google Scholar
  39. Hammed SK, Prajapati S, Simsek H, Simsek S (2016) Growth regime and environmental remediation of microalgae. Algae 31:189–204.  https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2016.31.8.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hentati O, Lachhab R, Ayadi M, Ksibi M (2013) Toxicity assessment for petroleum-contaminated soil using terrestrial invertebrates and plant bioassays. Environ Monit Assess 185:2989–2998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hlavová M, Turóczy Z, Bišová K (2015) Improving microalgae for biotechnology-from genetics to synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hong Y-W, Yuan D-X, Lin Q-M, Yang T-L (2008) Accumulation and biodegradation of phenanthrene and fluoranthene by the algae enriched from a mangrove aquatic ecosystem. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1400–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkinson BM, Roe K, Barbeau KA (2008) Heme uptake by Microscilla marina and evidence for heme uptake systems in the genomes of diverse marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6263–6270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ibrahim MBM, Gamila HA (2004) Algal bioassay for evaluating the role of algae in bioremediation of crude oil: II. Freshwater phytoplankton assemblages. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73:971–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jacobson SN, Alexander M (1981) Enhancement of the microbial dehalogenation of a model chlorinated compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:1062–1066Google Scholar
  46. Jacques NR, McMartin DW (2009) Evaluation of algal phytoremediation of light extractable petroleum hydrocarbons in subarctic climates. Remediat J 20:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jasmin I, Mallikarjuna P (2011) Satellite-based remote sensing and geographic information systems and their application in the assessment of groundwater potential, with particular reference to India. Hydrogeol J 19(4):729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jasti S, Sieracki ME, Poulton NJ, Giewat MW, Rooney-Varga JN (2005) Phylogenetic diversity and specificity of bacteria closely associated with Alexandrium spp. and other phytoplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3483–3494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Karamalidis AK, Evangelou AC, Karabika E, Koukkou AI, Drainas C, Voudrias EA (2010) Laboratory scale bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil by indigenous microorganisms and added Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Spet. Bioresour Technol 101(16):6545–6552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kesaano M, Sims R (2014) Algal biofilm based technology for wastewater treatment. Algal Res 5:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirso U, Irha N (1998) Role of algae in fate of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the aquatic environment. Environ Toxicol Environ Saf 41:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kneip C, Lockhart P, Voß CMaier U-G (2007) Nitrogen fixation in eukaryotes: new models for symbiosis. BMC Evol Biol 7:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kruse O, Rupprecht J, Mussgnug JH, Dismukes GC, Hankamer B (2005) Photosynthesis: a blueprint for solar energy capture and biohydrogen production technologies. Photochem Photobiol Sci 4:957–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar H, Kumari JP (2015) Heavy metal lead influative toxicity and its assessment in phytoremediating plants: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kumari B, Gupta PK, Kumar D (2019) In-situ observation and Nitrate-N load assessment in Madhubani District, Bihar, India. J Geol Soc India (Springer) 93(1):113–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-019-1130-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liebe B, Fock HP (1992) Growth and adaption of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii on diesel exhaust particle extracts. J Gen Microbiol 138:973–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luther M (1990) Degradation of di¡erent substituted aromatic compounds as nutrient sources by the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Dechema Biotechnol Conf 4:613–615Google Scholar
  58. Luther M, Soeder CJ (1987) Some naphthalene sulphonic acids as sulphur sources for the green microalga, Scenedesmus obliquus. Chemosphere 16:1565–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Margesin R (2000) Potential of cold-adapted microorganisms for bioremediation of oil-polluted alpine soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 46:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Margesin R, Walder G, Schinner F (2000) The impact of hydrocarbon remediation (diesel oil and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) on enzyme activities and microbial properties of soil. Acta Biotechnol 20:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mata T, Martins A, Caetanao N (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Matamoros V, García J, Bayona JM (2005) Behavior of selected pharmaceuticals in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: a pilot-scale study. Environ Sci Technol 39:5449–5454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mouget JL, Dakhama A, Lavoie MC, Delanoue J (1995) Algal growth enhancement by bacteria – is consumption of photosynthetic oxygen involved. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 18:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Muñoz R, Guieysse B, Mattiasson B (2003) Phenanthrene biodegradation by an algal-bacterial consortium in two-phase partitioning bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mustapha IH, Gupta PK, Yadav BK, van Bruggen JJA, Lens PNL (2018) Performance evaluation of duplex constructed wetlands for the treatment of diesel contaminated wastewater. Chemosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Naas MH, Acio JA, El Telib AE (2014) Aerobic biodegradation of BTEX: progresses and prospects. J Environ Chem Eng 2(2):1104–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Najafi N, Hosseini R, Ahmadi A (2011) Impact of gamma rays on the Phaffia rhodozyma genome revealed by RAPD-PCR. Iran J Microbiol 3:216Google Scholar
  68. Narayanan M, Tracy JC, Davis LC, Erickson LE (1998) Modeling the fate of toluene in a chamber with alfalfa plants 1. Theory and modelling concepts. J Hazard Subst Res 1:1–30Google Scholar
  69. Ojo AO, Oyelami CA, Adereti AO (2014) Hydro-geochemical and geophysical study of groundwater in the suburb of Osogbo, South Western Nigeria. J Earth Sci Clim Change 5:205.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Olson MR, Sale TC (2015) Implications of soil mixing for NAPL source zone remediation: column studies and modeling of field-scale systems. J Contam Hydrol 177-178:206–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oostrom M, Dane JH, Wietsma TW (2007) A review of multidimensional, multifluid, intermediate-scale experiments: flow behavior, saturation imaging, and tracer detection and quantification. Vadose Zone J 6(3):610–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pittman J, Dean A, Osundeko O (2011) The potential of sustainable algal biofuel production using wastewater resources. Bioresour Technol 102:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Darzins A, Posewitz MC (2010) Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot Cell 9:486–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ranjan S, Gupta PK, Yadav BK (2018) Chapter 6: Application of nano-materials in subsurface remediation techniques – challenges and future prospects. In: Recent advances in environmental management, vol 1. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. isbn:9780815383147Google Scholar
  75. Richmond A (2004) Principles for attaining maximal microalgal productivity in photobioreactors: an overview. In: Asian Pacific phycology in the 21st century: prospects and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodell M, Famiglietti JS (2002) The potential for satellite-based monitoring of groundwater storage changes using GRACE: the high plains aquifer, Central US. J Hydrol 263(1-4):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roeselers G, van Loosdrecht MCM, Muyzer G (2008) Phototrophic biofilms and their potential applications. J Appl Phycol 20:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sapp M, Schwaderer AS, Wiltshire KH, Hoppe HG, Gerdts G, Wichels A (2007) Species-specific bacterial communities in the phycosphere of microalgae? Microb Ecol 53:683–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sarkar D, Ferguson M, Datta R, Birnbaum S (2005) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation. Environ Pollut 136(1):187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.09.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmidt S, Fortnagel P, Wittich RM (1993) Biodegradation and transformation of 4,4P- and 2,4-dihalodiphenyl ethers by Sphingomonas sp. strain SS33. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3931–3933Google Scholar
  81. Semple KT, Cain RB (1996) Biodegradation of phenolics by Ochromonas danica. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1265–1273Google Scholar
  82. Semple KT, Cain RB, Schmidt S (1999) Biodegradation of aromatic compounds by microalgae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 170:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shehzadi M, Afzal M, Khan MU, Islam E, Mobin A, Anwar S, Khan QM (2014) Enhanced degradation of textile effluent in constructed wetland system using Typha domingensis and textile effluent-degrading endophytic bacteria. Water Res 58:152–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shimp JF, Tracy JC, Davis LC, Lee E, Huang W, Erickson LE, Schnoor JL (1993) Beneficial effects of plants in the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic materials. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 23(1):41–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18(5):647–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00026-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Suzuki T, Yamaya S (2005) Removal of hydrocarbons in a rotating biological contactor with biodrum. Process Biochem 40:3429–3433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Takacova A, Smolinská M, Semerád M, Matúš P (2015) Degradation of BTEX by microalgae Parachlorella kessleri. Pet Coal 57(2):101–107Google Scholar
  88. Tang X, He LY, Tao XQ, Dang Z, Guo CL, Lu GN, Yi XY (2010) Construction of an artificial microalgal bacterial consortium that efficiently degrades crude oil. J Hazard Mater 181:1158–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tormoehlen LM, Tekulve KJ, Agas KA (2014) Hydrocarbon toxicity: a review. Clin Toxicol 52:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsao C, Song H, Bartha R (1998) Metabolism of benzene, toluene, and xylene hydrocarbons in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(12):4924Google Scholar
  91. Ueno R, Wada S, Urano N (2006) Synergetic effects of cell immobilization in polyurethane foam and use of thermotolerant strain on degradation of mixed hydrocarbon substrate by Prototheca zopfii. Fish Sci 72:1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ueno R, Wada S, Urano N (2007) Repeated batch cultivation of the hydrocarbon-degrading, micro-algal strain Prototheca zopfii RND16 immobilized in polyurethane foam. Can J Microbiol 54:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ugwu CU, Aoyagi H, Uchiyama H (2008) Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresour Technol 99:4021–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. USEPA (2006) In situ and ex situ biodegradation technologies for remediation of contaminated sites, EPA/625/R-06/015Google Scholar
  95. Van Stempvoort D, Biggar K (2008) Potential for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater under cold climate conditions: a review. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:16–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Voudrias EA, Yeh MF (1994) Dissolution of a toluene pool under constant and variable hydraulic gradients with implications for aquifer remediation. Groundwater 32(2):305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Walker JD, Colwell RR, Petrakis L (1975a) Degradation of petroleum by an alga, Prototheca zop¢i. Appl Microbiol 30:79–81Google Scholar
  98. Walker JD, Colwell RR, Vaituzis Z, Meyer SA (1975b) Petroleum degrading achlorophyllous alga Prototheca zopfii. Nature 254:423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang D, Liu Y, Lin Z, Yang Z, Hao C (2008) Isolation and identification of surfactin producing Bacillus subtilis strain and its effect of surfactin on crude oil. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 48(3):304–311Google Scholar
  100. Wang S-K, Stiles AR, Guo C, Liu CZ (2014) Microalgae cultivation in photobioreactors: an overview of light characteristics. Eng Life Sci 14:550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Warshawsky D, Radike M, Jayasimhulu K, Cody T (1988) Metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene by a dioxygenase system of the fresh green alga Selenastrum capricornutum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 152:540–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wolfaardt GM, Lawrence JR, Robarts RD, Caldwell DE (1994) The role of interactions, sessile growth, and nutrient amendments on the degradative efficiency of a microbial consortium. Can J Microbiol 40:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yadav BK, Hassanizadeh SM (2011) An overview of biodegradation of LNAPLs in coastal (semi)-arid environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 220:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yadav BK, Ansari FA, Basu S, Mathur A (2013) Remediation of LNAPL contaminated groundwater using plant-assisted biostimulation and bioaugmentation methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 225(1):1793.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1793-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhou AX, Zhang YL, Dong TZ, Lin XY, Su XS (2015) Response of the microbial community to seasonal groundwater level fluctuations in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(13):10094–10106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pankaj Kumar Gupta
    • 1
  • Shashi Ranjan
    • 1
  • Sanjay Kumar Gupta
    • 2
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Department of HydrologyRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology – DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations