Advertisement

Learning Analytics in Distance and Mobile Learning for Designing Personalised Software

  • Katerina KabassiEmail author
  • Efthimios Alepis
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 158)

Abstract

Distance Learning, in its synchronous and asynchronous form, has gained an increasing interest over the last decades, both because of the realization of the “digital era” and also due to the reachability and accessibility it offered to human education. Lately, mobile learning has also been gaining a lot of interest due to the widespread popularity of Smartphones. In order to improve human educational interaction with Personal Computers and Smartphones, collecting learning analytics data and utilizing them is considered as a valuable requirement. Distance and mobile learning analytics may improve and assist the entire learning process by providing personalized software solutions. This paper focuses on the collection and the combination of the learning analytics data offered by different modalities in Personal Computers and modern Smartphones. For this combination two different Multi-Criteria Decision making theories are used, namely the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Simple Additive Weighting model.

Keywords

Learning analytics Distance learning Mobile learning Multi-criteria analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Merisitis, JP., Phipps, RA.: What’s the Difference?: Outcomes of Distance Vs. Traditional Classroom-Based Learning, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 31(3), 12–14 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0091389909602686
  2. 2.
    Peraton, H.: Open and Distance Learning in the Developing World. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moller, L., Foshay, W., Huett, J.: The evolution of distance education: implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web. TechTrends 52(4), 66–70 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartner: Gartner says by 2018, more than 50 percent of users will use a tablet or smartphone first for all online activities. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2939217 (2014)
  5. 5.
    Gartner: Gartner forecasts at worldwide device shipments until 2018. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3560517 (2017)
  6. 6.
    The Telegraph: Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/11/01/mobile-web-usage-overtakes-desktop-for-first-time/ (2016)
  7. 7.
    Zopounidis, C.: Knowledge-based multi-criteria decision support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195, 827–828 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saaty, Τ.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tiwari, N.:. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify Performance Scenarios for Enterprise Application. Comput. Meas. Group, Measure It 4(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulubrhan, F., Akmar Mokhtar, A., Muhammad, M.: Comparative analysis between fuzzy and traditional analytical hierarchy process. In: MATEC Web of Conferences 13 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Casey, D.: A journey to legitimacy: the historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends 52(2), 45–51 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong, J.C., Tai, K.H., Hwang, M.Y., Kuo, Y.C., Chen, J.S.: Internet cognitive failure relevant to users’ satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 66, 353–362 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Gahtani, S.S.: Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: a structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Inf. 12(1), 27–50 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 14, 129–135 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gunawardena, C.N., McIsaac, M.S.: Distance education. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd edn., pp. 355–395. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luo, N., Zhang, M., Qi, D.: Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Comput. Educ. 115(2017), 153–160 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feldmann, B.: Two decades of e-learning in distance teaching from web 1.0 to web 2.0 at the University of Hagen. In: Learning Technology for Education Challenges, Communication in Computer and Information Science, vol. 446, pp. 163–172 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia, R., Falkner, K., Vivian, R.: Systematic literature review: self-regulated learning strategies using e-learning tools for computer science. Comput. Educ. 123, 150–163 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alepis, E., Virvou, M.: Object-Oriented User Interfaces for Personalized Mobile Learning. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 64. Springer, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Virvou, M., Alepis, E.: User modeling in mobile learning environments for learners with special needs. In: Tsihrintzis, G., Virvou, M., Jain, L. (eds.): Multimedia Services in Intelligent Environments. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 25. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nie, L., Zhang, L., Wang, M., Hong, R., Farseev, A., Chua, T.-S.: Learning user attributes via mobile social multimedia analytics. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 8(3), Article 36 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ravì, D., Wong, C., Lo, B., Yang, G.Z.: A deep learning approach to on-node sensor data analytics for mobile or wearable devices. IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Inform. 21(1), 56–64 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alsheikh, M.A., Niyato, D., Lin, S., Tan, H.P., Han, Z.: Mobile big data analytics using deep learning and apache spark. IEEE Netw. 30(3), 22–29 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., Specht, M.: Time will tell: the role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Comput. Educ. 89, 53–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuik, T., Mumblat, Y., Dim, E.: Enabling mobile user modeling: infrastructure for personalization in ubiquitous computing. In: 2nd ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, MOBILESoft 2015, Florence, Italy, pp. 48–51, 16–17 May 2015Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Avouris, N.M., Yiannoutsou, N.: A review of mobile location-based games for learning across physical and virtual spaces. J. UCS 18(15), 2120–2142 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fidas, C.A., Avouris, N.M.: Personalization of mobile applications in cultural heritage environments. In: 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, IISA 2015, Corfu, Greece, pp. 1–6, 6–8 July 2015Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirci, P., Unal, P.: Personalization of mobile health applications for remote health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalization in Persuasive Technology Co-located with the 11th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PT 2016), Salzburg, Austria, April, pp. 120–125, 5 Apr 2016Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wecker, A.J., Kuik, T., Stock, O.: Dynamic personalization based on mobile behavior: From personality to personalization: a blueprint. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, MobileHCI ‘16, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 978–983(2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zare, S.: Personalization in mobile learning for people with special needs. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services. UAHCI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6768. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qoussini, A.E.M., Jusoh, Y.Y.B.: A review on personalization and agents technology in mobile learning. In: 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Shanghai, pp. 260–264 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Badidi, E.: A Cloud-based framework for personalized mobile learning provisioning using learning objects metadata adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU, vol. 1, pp. 368–375 (2016). ISBN 978-989-758-179-3Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sandberg, J., Maris, M., Hoogendoorn, P.: The added value of a gaming context and intelligent adaptation for a mobile learning application for vocabulary learning. Comput. Educ. 76(2014), 119–130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Politou, E., Alepis, E., Patsakis, C.: Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: challenges and proposed solutions. J. Cybersecur. 1–20 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Casino, F., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Patsakis, C., Puig, D., Solanas, A.: A k-anonymous approach to privacy preserving collaborative filtering. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 81(6), 1000–1011 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Karray, F., Alemzadeh, M., Saleh, J.A., Arab, M.N.: Human-computer interaction: overview on state of the art. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 1(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Palanque, P., Paterno, F.: Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification. Springer Science & Business Media, p. 43 (2001). ISBN 9783540416630Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zahálka, J., Rudinac, S., Worring, M.: Interactive multimodal learning for venue recommendation. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 17(12), 2235–2244 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shin, H., Lee, M., Kim, E.Y.: Personalized digital TV content recommendation with integration of user behavior profiling and multimodal content rating. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 55(3), 1417–1423 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Virvou, M., Tsihrintzis, G.A., Alepis, E., Stathopoulou, I.O., Kabassi, K.: Emotion recognition: empirical studies towards the combination of audio-lingual and visual-facial modalities through multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 21(02) (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alepis, E., Virvou, M., Drakoulis, S.: Human smartphone interaction: Exploring smartphone senses. In: IISA 2014, The 5th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, Chania, pp. 44–48 (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsai, T.-C., Peng, C.-T.: A Smartphone assisted learning system with wireless sensors. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, CCIS, vol. 216, Issue PART 3, pp. 557–561 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mehta, D.D., Zañartu, M., Feng, S.W., Cheyne, H.A.I., Hillman, R.E.: Mobile voice health monitoring using a wearable accelerometer sensor and a smartphone platform. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59(12 PART2), pp. 3090–3096, Article number 6257444 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Prudêncio, J., Aguiar, A., Lucani, D.: Physical Activity Recognition from Smartphone Embedded Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), LNCS, vol. 7887, pp. 863–872 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang, L., Liu, J., Jiang, H., Guan, Y.: SensTrack: energy-efficient location tracking with smartphone sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 13(10), 3775–3784, Article number 6563204 (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ahmetovic, D.: Smartphone-assisted mobility in urban environments for visually impaired users through computer vision and sensor fusion. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, vol. 2, pp. 15–18, Article number 6569055 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sirah, S., Mikhailov, L., Keane, J.A.: PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pair-wise comparsion judgements. Int Trans Oper Res 22(2), 203–382 (2015)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kabassi, K., Virvou, M.: Combining decision making theories with a cognitive theory for intelligent help: a comparison. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 45(2), 176–186 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ionian UniversityZakynthosGreece
  2. 2.University of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations