Advertisement

Private Labelling, Governance, and Sustainability: An Analysis of the Tea Industry in India

  • Saji M. Kadavil
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Indian Management book series (PAIM)

Abstract

This chapter makes an attempt to critically analyse certification programmes and voluntary standards of national and international private labels for addressing governance and sustainability challenges in the Indian tea industry. By analysing different private labels in the industry, the study critically examines a few questions, such as how sustainable the certification programmes are enabling better social standards, is there any difference on price for the producers after certification, and how the private labels could ensure a steady market for the producers with different scales of operations. This chapter argues that the certification process and its implementation need to be more inclusive to cover the challenges of workers and small growers which may eventually help the industry to move forward.

Keywords

Voluntary standards Tea certification Indian tea industry Small tea growers Working and living conditions 

References

  1. BBC. 2015. Report on RA Certified Gardens of Assam Tea Company and McLeod Russel. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34173532.
  2. Bhowmik, Sharit K. 2015. Living Conditions of Tea Plantation. Economic and Political Weekly 50 (46–47, Nov.): 29–32.Google Scholar
  3. Blackman, Allen, and J. Rivera. 2011. Producer Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification. Conservation Biology 25 (6, Dec.): 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Das, Kalyan. 2012. Tea Smallholdings in Assam: Is There a Way Out? Economic and Political Weekly 47 (11, Mar.): 23–25.Google Scholar
  5. Dragusanu, Raluca, D. Giovannucci, and Nathan Nunn. 2014. The Economics of Fair Trade. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3, Summer): 217–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fridell, Gavin. 2007. Fair Trade Coffee and Commodity Fetishism: The Limits of Market-Driven Social Justice. Historical Materialism 15 (4, Jan.): 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gereffi, G. 1996. Global Commodity Chains: New Forms of Coordination and Control among Nations and Firms in International Industries. Competition & Change 1 (4, Dec.): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 1998. Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labour in East Asia. In The Four Asian Tigers: Economic Development and the Global Political Economy, ed. E.M. Kim, 93–124. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Huijstee, M., and G. Pieter. 2008. The Practice of Stakeholder Dialogue between Multinational and NGOs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (5, Oct.): 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffee, Daniel. 2012. Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-Optation in the Fair Trade Movement. Social Problems 5 (1, Feb.): 94–116.Google Scholar
  11. John, J., and P. Mansingh. 2013. Plantation Labour Act 1951 and Social Cost—The Case of Tea Industry. NRPPD Discussion Paper 26, Centre for Development Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, K. Kevin, and L. Mucha. 2014. Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for Nonprofit Organizations: Accountability for the Public Good. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (6, Dec.): 1465–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Linton, April. 2005. Partnering for Sustainability: Business–NGO Alliances in the Coffee Industry. Development in Practice 15 (3&4, June): 600–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loconto, Allison. 2014. Sustaining an Enterprise, Enacting Sustainabilitea. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (6, Nov.): 819–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Potts, J., M. Lynch, et al. 2014. The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review: Standards and the Green Economy. Canada: The International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  16. Potts, J., V. Voora, et al. 2017. Standard and Biodiversity. Canada: The International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  17. Rao, C. Niranjan. 2005. Geographical Indicators in Indian Context: A Case Study of Darjeeling Tea. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (42, Oct.): 4545–4550.Google Scholar
  18. Ratnam, Venkata C.S. 2000. India and International Labour Standards. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 35 (4, Apr.): 461–485.Google Scholar
  19. Raynolds, L.T. 2002. Consumer/Producer Links in Fair Trade Coffee Networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42 (4, Oct): 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reddy, V.N., and S.K. Bhowmik. 1989. Small Growers and Co-operative Tea Factories in Nilgiris. Economic and Political Weekly 24 (39, Sep.): A145–A151.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, Tracey M. 2013. The Rise of Rule Four Institutions: Voluntary Standards, Certification and Labelling Systems. Ecology Law Quarterly 47 (1, Mar.): 107–156.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenblum, P. 2014. The More Things Change…The World Bank, Tata and Enduring Abuses on India’s Tea Plantations. Report, Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute, Columbia.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, B. Richard. 2014. Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness. The American Journal of International Law 108 (2, Apr.): 211–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tallontire, Anne. 2007. CSR and Regulation: Towards a Framework for Understanding Private Standards Initiatives in the Agri-Food Chain. Third World Quarterly 28 (4, May): 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The Tea Board of India. 2016. Tea Statistics. www.indiateaportal.com.
  26. ———. 2017. Tea Statistics. www.indiateaportal.com.
  27. UTZ. 2014. UTZ Certified Impact Report. January 2014. https://utzcertified.org/en/mediacenter/reports-brochures/26582894.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saji M. Kadavil
    • 1
  1. 1.New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations