Manufacturing Software Units: ISO 16300-3 Main Guidelines for Interoperability Verification and Validation

  • H. BassonEmail author
  • M. Bouneffa
  • M. Matsuda
  • A. Ahmad
  • D. Chung
  • E. Arai
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 9)


The ISO 16300-3 standard considers the required artefacts for interoperability verification and validation throughout the whole cycle of manufacturing application development. In this chapter, an important work of ISO series standards has been elaborated in the context of manufacturing application development. The current work presents the ISO 16300-3 main guidelines devoted to the verification and validation of software unit’s interoperability for the manufacturing software units which can be considered as the most critical part of any automated manufacturing process. The various proposals of ISO 16300-3 are individually detailed to some extent showing its pertinence for a systematic verification and validation of manufacturing software units interoperability.


Manufacturing software units Interoperability verification Interoperability validation ISO 16300 guidelines 


  1. 1.
    Schweer, D., & Sahl, J. C. (2017). The digital transformation of industry–the benefit for Germany. In The drivers of digital transformation (pp. 23–31).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khalfallah, M., Figay, N., Ferreira Da Silva, C. et al. (2016). A cloud-based platform to ensure interoperability in aerospace industry. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, L., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2017). A lightweight intelligent manufacturing system based on cloud computing for plate production. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 16300-3: 2017. (2017). Automation systems and integration—Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions—part 3: Verification and validation of interoperability among capability units. Available at
  5. 5.
    ISO/IEC 1600-N (1…5). (2009). Industrial automation systems and integration—Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsuda, M., & Wang, Q. (2010). Software interoperability tools: standardized capability-profiling methodology ISO16100. EAI2N 2010, 140–151.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/TR 18161:2013. (2013). Automation systems and integration—Applications integration approach using information exchange requirements modelling and software capability profiling. Publication date: 2013–07. Available at
  8. 8.
    Ahmad, A., Basson, H., & Bouneffa, M. (2017). Analyzing and modeling the structural and qualitative interdependencies of software evolution. In 7th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, workshop of, The 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Science, Beijing, China (25–27 June 2017).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basson, H., Matsuda, M., & Chung, D. (2014). A contribution to Software interoperability of software application. In I-ESA, INTEROP-VLAB, European Virtual Laboratory for Enterprise Interoperability. Albi, France (24–28, March 2014).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basson, H., Matsuda, M., Bouneffa, M., Ahmad, A., et al. (2016). Qualitative evaluation of manufacturing software units interoperability using ISO 25000 quality model. In Enterprise interoperability VII (pp. 199–209). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Basson
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Bouneffa
    • 1
  • M. Matsuda
    • 2
  • A. Ahmad
    • 1
  • D. Chung
    • 3
  • E. Arai
    • 4
  1. 1.EILCO, LISICUniversity of LittoralCalaisFrance
  2. 2.Kanagawa Institute of TechnologyAtsugiJapan
  3. 3.Rockwell AutomationClevelandUSA
  4. 4.Osaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations