Toward the Use of Upper-Level Ontologies for Semantically Interoperable Systems: An Emergency Management Use Case
- 417 Downloads
In the context of globalization and knowledge management, information technologies require an ample need of unprecedented levels of data exchange and sharing to allow collaboration between heterogeneous systems. Yet, understanding the semantics of the exchanged data is one of the major challenges. Semantic interoperability can be ensured by capturing knowledge from diverse sources by using ontologies and align these latter by using upper-level ontologies to come up with a common shared vocabulary. In this paper, we aim in one hand to investigate the role of upper-level ontologies as a mean for enabling the formalization and integration of heterogeneous sources of information and how it may support interoperability of systems. On the other hand, we present several upper-level ontologies and how we chose and then used basic formal ontology (BFO) as an upper-level ontology and common core ontology (CCO) as a mid-level ontology to develop a modular ontology that defines emergency responders’ knowledge starting from firefighters’ module for a solution to the semantic interoperability problem in emergency management.
KeywordsSemantic interoperability Ontology Upper-level ontology BFO Mid-level ontology CCO Emergency management
This research was conducted as part of the POLARISC (Plateforme OpérationnelLe d’Actualisation du Renseignement Interservices pour la Sécurité Civile) project. It was funded by the regional operational program FEDER/FSE «Midi-Pyrénées et Garonne 2014–2020» as part of the call for projects “Easynov2016.”
- 1.IEEE. (1990). IEEE standard computer dictionary: a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries.Google Scholar
- 4.Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., & Winter, S. (2005). Ontology and semantic interoperability. In Large-scale 3D data integration: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 139–160).Google Scholar
- 6.Obrst, L. (2003). Ontologies for semantically interoperable systems. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM.Google Scholar
- 8.Degen, W., et al. (2001). GOL: Toward an axiomatized upper-level ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (Vol. 2001) ACM.Google Scholar
- 10.Semy, S. K., Pulvermacher, M. K., & Obrst, L. J. (2004). Toward the use of an upper ontology for US government and US military domains: An evaluation. No. MTR-04B0000063. Bedford MA: MITRE Corp.Google Scholar
- 11.Leo Obrst: The Semantic Spectrum & Semantic Models, a Powerpoint presentation. http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/presentation/LeoObrst_20060112/OntologySpectrumSemanticModels–LeoObrst_20060112.ppt.
- 12.Baumgartner, N., & Retschitzegger, W. (2006). A survey of upper ontologies for situation awareness. In Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Knowledge Sharing and Collaborative Engineering, St. Thomas, US VI.Google Scholar
- 13.Stevenson, G., et al. (2009). Ontonym: A collection of upper ontologies for developing pervasive systems. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies. ACM.Google Scholar
- 14.Liu, Y., Chen, S., & Wang, Y. (2014). SOFERS: Scenario ontology for emergency response system. JNW, 9(9).Google Scholar
- 15.Matuszek, C., et al. (2006). An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Formalizing and Compiling Background Knowledge and Its Applications to Knowledge Representation and Question Answering.Google Scholar
- 16.Herre, H. (2010). General formal ontology (GFO): A foundational ontology for conceptual modelling: Theory and applications of ontology: Computer applications. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- 17.Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (Vol. 2001). ACM.Google Scholar
- 18.Farrar, S., & Bateman, J. (2004). General ontology baseline, deliverable D1, I1-[OntoSpace]; workpackage 1.Google Scholar
- 19.Smith, B., & Ceusters, W. (2010). Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Applied ontology, 5(3–4).Google Scholar
- 20.Seppälä, S., Smith, B., & Ceusters, W. (2014). Applying the realism-based ontology-versioning method for tracking changes in the basic formal ontology. In: FOIS.Google Scholar
- 22.COSMO, Home Page. Retrieved January 15, 2018 from http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/COSMO.html.
- 23.Mascardi, V., & Cordì, V., & Rosso, P. (2007). A comparison of upper ontologies. WOA.Google Scholar
- 24.Semy, S. K., Pulvermacher, M. K., & Obrst, L. J. (2004). Toward the use of an upper ontology for US government and US military domains: An evaluation. Bedford, MA: MITRE Corp.Google Scholar
- 25.Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D. (2015). Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Rudnicki, R. (2016). An overview of the common core ontologies. CUBRC, Inc.Google Scholar
- 27.Cubrc Homepage. Retrieved November 20, 2017 from http://www.cubrc.org/index.php/data-science-and-information-fusion/ontology.
- 28.Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2).Google Scholar
- 29.Lovrencic, S., & Cubrilo, M. (2008). Ontology evaluation-comprising verification and validation. In CECIIS.Google Scholar