Physical Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer Treatment

  • Fernanda Alaite Zambelli
  • Alessandra Tessaro


Despite the decrease in morbidity with the evolution of breast cancer treatment, many patients have functional sequelae. Physical therapy and some medications can prevent or treat most of these limitations.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Changhong Y, Koifman S, Mattos IE, Koifman RJ, Bergmann A. Nomograms for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema after axillary dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2580–9. Prospective cohort study with 1054 Brazilian women treated for breast cancer. The incidence of lymphedema at 5 years was 30.3% and the risk factors were: age, body mass index, chemotherapy infusions in the operated arm, level of axillary emptying, radiotherapy field, seroma, infection and early edema. Nomogram for calculating individual risk is available at Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferguson CM, Swaroop MN, Horick N, et al. Impact of ipsilateral blood draws, injections, blood pressure measurements, and air travel on the risk of lymphedema for patients treated for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(7):691–8. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fukushima K, Carmo L, Borinelli A, Ferreira C. Frequency and associated factors of axillary web syndrome in women who had undergone breast cancer surgery: a transversal and retrospective study. Springerplus. 2015;4:112. Published online 2015 Mar 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris SR, Schmitz KH, Campbell KL, McNeely ML. Clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer rehabilitation: syntheses of guideline recommendations and qualitative appraisals. Cancer. 2012;118(8 suppl):2312–24. Summary of consensus recommendations after systematic review on breast cancer rehabilitation in the following areas: limb restraint, lymphedema, pain, fatigue, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, cardiotoxicity, bone health, and weight control. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oremus M, Dayes I, Walker K, Raina P. Systematic review: conservative treatments for secondary lymphedema. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:6. A systematic review of 44 articles on the treatment of secondary lymphedema, most cases of upper limb lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer. It is not possible to establish comparisons between the different therapies, but apparently all of them have some degree of efficacy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(30):3726–33. Review of lymphedema secondary to the treatment of breast cancer, with details of physiotherapeutic, pharmacological and surgical treatments. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scaffidi M, Vulpiani MC, Vetrano M, Conforti F, Marchetti MR, Bonifacino A, et al. Early rehabilitation reduces the onset of complications in the upper limb following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48(4):601–11. A clinical study comparing 83 patients submitted to breast cancer treatment. Group A (25 women) did not undergo physical therapy during hospitalization and Group B (58 women) started therapy immediately. The results after 180 days demonstrated a superiority by far of the early onset of physiotherapy in relation to the mobility of the upper limb. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, Cheville A, Smith R, Lewis-Grant L, Bryan CJ, Williams-Smith CT, Greene QP. Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):664–73. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernanda Alaite Zambelli
    • 1
  • Alessandra Tessaro
    • 2
  1. 1.Physical TherapyBBCSG – Brazilian Breast Cancer Study GroupSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Physical TherapyMoinhos de Vento HospitalPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations