Advertisement

Pedagogies of Hopefulness and Thoughtfulness: The Social-Political Role of Higher Education in Contemporary Societies

  • Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is a link between critical thought and the ability to remain hopeful even under highly problematic conditions like the neoliberal environment of contemporary higher education. It discusses Hannah Arendt’s and Richard Rorty’s reflections on thinking and hope and suggests that despite their different starting points, the two authors share much. In particular, it is argued that both Arendt and Rorty reiterate the idea of Socratic irony and maieutic in a twentieth century context. Towards the end of the chapter, Rorty and Arendt are also brought into disagreement. Because of its adherence to facts and events, it is argued, Arendt’s thought is better able to produce meaningful criticism of existing conditions, accompanied with hope for changing them.

References

  1. Ahola, S., & Hoffmann, D. M. (2012). Higher Education from a Finnish Perspective: An Introduction. In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.), Higher Education Research in Finland: Emerging Structures and Contemporary Issues (pp. 11–25). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1968). Political Experiences in the Twentieth Century. Course Delivered at the New School for Social Research. Library of Congress, Arendt Archive.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (1973) [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind, One: “Thinking”. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, H. (1998) [1958]. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Arendt, H. (2001) [1968]. Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  8. Arendt, H. (2003a). Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  9. Arendt, H. (2003b). Denktagebuch, 1950–1973. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  10. Arendt, H. (2006a) [1961]. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Arendt, H. (2006b) [1962]. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Arendt, H. (2018). Thinking Without a Banister: Essays in Understanding II. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  13. Arendt, H., & Jaspers, K. (1992). Correspondence 1926–1969 (L. Kohler & H. Saner, Ed., R. Kimber & R. Kimber, Trans.). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  14. Baldwin, J. (1998). A Talk to Teachers. In J. Baldwin, Collected Essays. New York: Literary Classics.Google Scholar
  15. Berglund, E. (2008). I Wanted to Be an Academic, Not ‘A Creative’: Notes on Universities and the New Capitalism. Ephemera, 8(3), 322–330.Google Scholar
  16. Bernstein, R. J. (2005). The Abuse of Evil: The Corruption of Politics and Religion Since 9/11. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bernstein, R. J. (2017). Ironic Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bloch, E. (2018). On Karl Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Cornell, D. (2008). Moral Images of Freedom: A Future for Critical Theory. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, B. (2005). The (Im)possibility of Intellectual Work in Neoliberal Regimes. Discourse, 26(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Degerman, D. (2016). Within the Heart’s Darkness: The Role of Emotions in Arendt’s Political Thought. European Journal of Political Theory. Published Online Before Print, May 18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116647850.
  22. Dewey, J. (1980). Art as Experience. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  23. Duarte, E. (2001). Eclipse of Thinking: An Arendtian Critique of Cooperative Learning. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and Education: Renewing Our Common World. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  24. Emerson, R. W. (1982). Selected Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Euben, P. (2001). Hannah Arendt on Politicizing Education and Other Clichés. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and Education: Renewing Our Common World. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  26. Fraser, N. (1990). Solidarity or Singularity? Richard Rorty Between Romanticism and Technocracy. In A. R. Malachowski (Ed.), Reading Rorty: Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature and Beyond (pp. 303–321). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Glaude, E. S. (2007). In a Shade of Blue: Pragmatism and the Politics of Black America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldman, L. (2019). Revisiting the Social Value of College-Breeding. In C. S. Stagoll & M. P. Levine (Eds.), Pragmatism Applied: William James and the Challenges of Contemporary Life. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  29. Guaraldo, O. (2018), Public Happiness: Revisiting an Arendtian Hypothesis. Philosophy Today, 62(2), 397–418. Online Before Print, June 12.  https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201866218.
  30. Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  31. Hook, S. (1960). Pragmatism and the Tragic Sense of Life. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 33(1959–1960), 5–26.Google Scholar
  32. Hutchinson, A. C. (1989). The Three ‘Rs’: Reading/Rorty/Radically. Harvard Law Review, 103(2), 555–585.Google Scholar
  33. Hyvönen, A.-E. (2018a). Careless Speech: Conceptualizing Post-truth Politics. New Perspectives, 26(3), 31–55. Google Scholar
  34. Hyvönen, A.-E. (2018b). The Janus Face of Political Experience. Arendt Studies, 2, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyvönen, A.-E., & Harni, E. (2017). The Politics of Austerity and Entrepreneurialism: Reflections on the Role of Humanities. In J. Nixon (Ed.), Higher Education in Austerity Europe. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. James, W. (1987). Essays, Comments, and Reviews. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nixon, J. (2012). Interpretive Pedagogies for Higher Education: Arendt, Berger, Said, Nussbaum and Their Legacies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  38. Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2016). Mergers in Higher Education. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rorty, R. (1998a). Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rorty, R. (1998b). Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Rorty, R. (2003). Interview with Richard Rorty. Philosophy Now (October/November).Google Scholar
  45. Rorty, R. (2006). Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rorty, R. (2016). Philosophy as Poetry. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  48. Spicer, A. (2018). Business Bullshit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Tampere3. (2018a). Belief in humanity, belief in academic rigour—Tampere Universities. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3NAkSCWZVQ. Accessed February 27, 2019.
  50. Tampere3. (2018b). www.tampere3.fi. Promotional webpage (no longer accessible). Partly available through http://web.archive.org/web/20180826142414/; https://www.tampere3.fi/en/. Accessed February 27, 2019.
  51. Tervasmäki, T., & Tomperi, T. (2018). Koulutuspolitiikan arvovalinnat ja suunta satavuotiaassa Suomessa. niin & näin 2.Google Scholar
  52. Tienari, J., Aula, H.-M., & Aarrevaara, T. (2016). Built to Be Excellent? The Aalto University Merger in Finland. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomperi, T. (2009). Akateeminen kysymys? Yliopistolain kritiikki ja kiista uudesta yliopistosta. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  54. Unger, R. M. (1987). Social Theory: Its Situation and Its Task. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Voparil, C. (2006). Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  56. West, C. (1989). American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, R., & Leahy, A. (2018). U21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems. Universitas 21. Available at https://universitas21.com/sites/default/files/2018-05/U21_Rankings%20Report_0418_FULL_LR%20%281%29.pdf.
  58. Ylijoki, O.-H., Marttila, L., & Lyytinen, A. (2012). The Role of Basic Research at the Entrepreneurial University: Back to Basics? In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.), Higher Education Research in Finland Emerging Structures and Contemporary Issues. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen
    • 1
  1. 1.Tampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations