New Caledonia, Cornerstone of an Ambiguous French–Australian Relationship

  • Paul Soyez
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)


France, through New Caledonia, constitutes Australia’s third-closest neighbour, and this French overseas community in the South Pacific has become a cornerstone of the French–Australian bilateral relationship. However, the legitimacy of the French sovereignty over New Caledonia, based on a conflicted colonial history, has been challenged both internally—by a strong pro-independence Kanak movement—and externally—by Oceanian public opinion, especially in Australia. In response, French policy-makers have conducted thirty years of institutional, political, economic and social reforms to provide the archipelago with the largest autonomy possible within the French republican frame. New Caledonia has increasingly become a strategic topic for all its neighbours in the pursuit of their own interests. The ongoing condemnation of France’s presence in the region has partly come from Oceania’s ideal of regional cohesion, solidarity and destiny, based on independence from former colonial powers. This drive obliged Australia to take a position against France in order to strengthen its own legitimacy. New Caledonia has proven to be, at the same time, the source of vivid tensions between Canberra and Paris and the mirror of their own strategic ambiguities. Yet, New Caledonia currently represents one of the cornerstones of the strong cooperation that France and Australia have established for the stability of the South Pacific. This chapter examines the reasons for this positive shift and how has the 2018 referendum on New Caledonia’s self-determination affected the French–Australian bilateral relationship.


  1. Archives Nationales, Pierrefitte, France.Google Scholar
  2. National Archives of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Angleviel, F 2015, Un drame de la colonisation, Ouvéa, Nouvelle-Calédonie, mai 1988, Vendémiaire, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Chappell, D 1999, ‘The Noumea Accord: Decolonisation Without Independence in New Caledonia?’ Pacific Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Firth, S 2011, Australia in International Politics, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  6. Firth, S 2016, ‘Australia’s Detention Centre and the Erosion of Democracy in Nauru’, The Journal of Pacific History, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. James, K 2016, ‘The “Arrogant French”: Examination of a cliché in Australia’s Journalistic and Political Discourse’, Presentation at the ISFAR colloquium, 6 December.Google Scholar
  8. Mohamed-Gaillard, S 2010, L’archipel de la puissance? La politique de la France dans le Pacifique Sud de 1946 à 1998, P. Lang, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  9. Mokaddem, H 2005, Kanaky et/ou Nouvelle-Calédonie, Expressions, Marseille.Google Scholar
  10. Mrgudovic, N 2008, La France dans le Pacifique sud: les enjeux de la puissance, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  12. Wallis, J 2017, ‘Crowded and Complex: The Changing Geopolitics of the South Pacific’, ASPI The Strategist, 24 April. Available at Accessed 17 July 2017.
  13. Wallis, J & Dalsgaard, S 2016, Money, Manipulation and Misunderstanding on Manus Island. The Journal of Pacific History, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Soyez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations