Risk Factors in Smart City Development in Russia: A Survey

  • Lyudmila VidiasovaEmail author
  • Felippe Cronemberger
  • Evgenii Vidiasov
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)


Public managers and academics continue to express interest in smart cities. In contrast with flagrant enthusiasm with regards to technology applications towards achieving such goal, threats to local governments continue to grow across the globe, while risks and concerns remain underexplored in research. By examining a survey where experts rate factors and risks in smart city development, this paper sheds light to an array of vulnerabilities that may be overlooked by public managers and executives and may compromise their smart cities goals. Expanding on literature, findings suggest the most critical smart city development factors are technological (infrastructure development, open data services, availability of information resources), organizational (clear KPIs, coordination procedures, strategic planning, creating business environment, transparency in decision-making) and social ones (preferences in getting e-services, human capital growth). Markedly, experts understood the most serious risks involve technological and social adaption. The results achieved could be of interest for counting risk factors in the emerging smart cities.


Risk Smart cities Development Technology 



The study was performed with financial support by the grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project №17-78-10079): “Research on adaptation models of the Smart City Concept in the conditions of modern Russian Society”.


  1. 1.
    Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., Scorrano, F.: Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylized facts. Cities 38, 25–36 (2014). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hashem, I.A.T., et al.: The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(5), 748–758 (2016). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vidiasova, L., Kachurina, P., Cronemberger, F.: Smart cities prospects from the results of the world practice expert benchmarking. Procedia Comput. Sci. 119, 269–277 (2017). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, vol. 282 (2011).
  5. 5.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T.: What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Inf. Polity 20(1), 61–87 (2015). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chourabi, H., et al.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 2289–2297 (2012).
  7. 7.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Zhang, J., Puron-Cid, G.: Conceptualizing smartness in government: an integrative and multi-dimensional view. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 524–534 (2016). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., Savoldelli, A.: Citizen’s engagement and value co-production in smart and sustainable cities. In: International Conference on Public Policy, pp. 1–16. Milan (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu, Y., Zhang, W., Shen, J., Mo, Z., Peng, Y.: Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: idea, action and risk. J. Clean. Prod. 173, 60–66 (2018). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angelidou, M.: Smart city planning and development shortcomings. Tema. J. Land Use Mob. Environ. 10(1), 77–94 (2017). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gasco-Hernandez, M.: Building a smart city: lessons from barcelona. Commun. ACM 61(4), 50–55 (2018). Scholar
  12. 12.
    Musa, S.: Smart cities-a road map for development. IEEE Potentials 37(2), 19–23 (2018). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batty, M., et al.: Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 214(1), 481–518 (2012). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mustapha, K., Mcheick, H., Mellouli, S.: Smart cities and resilience plans: a multi-agent based simulation for extreme event rescuing. In: Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Nam, T. (eds.) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. PAIT, vol. 11, pp. 149–170. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen, M.T., Boundy, E.: Big data and smart (Equitable) cities. In: Thakuriah, P., Tilahun, N., Zellner, M. (eds.) Seeing Cities Through Big Data. SG, pp. 517–542. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borsekova, K., Korony, S., Vanova, A., Vitalisova, K.: Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: a research challenge with policy implications. Cities (2018, In press). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hollands, R.G.: Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chatterton, P., Hollands, R.: Urban nightscape: Youth cultures, pleasure spaces and corporate power. Routledge, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vanolo, A.: Is there anybody out there? The place and role in tomorrow’s smart cities. Future 82, 26–36 (2016). Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beretta, I.: The social effects of eco-innovations in Italian Smart Cities. Cities 72, 115–121 (2018). Scholar
  21. 21.
    The benefits and risks of policymakers’ use of Smart City technology. Mercatus Center. Research Summary (2016).
  22. 22.
    Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M.: Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Braun, T., Fung, B.C.M., Iqbal, F., Shah, B.: Security and privacy challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 39, 499–507 (2018). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar, H., Singh, M.K., Gupta, M.P., Madaan, J.: Bowing towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological forecasting and social change (2018) In press.
  25. 25.
    Baig, Z.A., et al.: Future challenges for smart cities cyber-security and digital forensics. Digit. Invest. 22, 3–13 (2017). Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dallaway, E.: Smart City risk factors could lead to loss of life (2016).
  27. 27.
    Mustafa, S.Z., Kar, A.K.: Evaluating multi-dimensional risk for digital services in smart Cities. In: Kar, A.K., et al. (eds.) I3E 2017. LNCS, vol. 10595, pp. 23–32. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) FIA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrison, C., Donnelly, I.A.: A theory of smart Cities. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS - 2011, Hull, UK, vol. 55 (1). ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waal, M., Dignum, M.: The citizen in the smart city. How the smart city could transform citizenship. It-Inf. Technol. 59(6), 263–273 (2017). Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bolívar, M.P.R.: Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 521–530. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., Sørensen, E.: Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Manag. Rev. 19(5), 1–15 (2017). Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brolchain, N.O., Ojo, A., Porwol, L., Minton, D., Barry, C.: Examining the feasibility of a Smart Region approach in the North West Atlantic and Borders Region of Ireland. In: Proceedings of the ICEGOV 2018 (2018, in press)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Concept of St. Petersburg development with the help of “smart city” technologies (2017). (In Russian),
  35. 35.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4), 404–428 (2000). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lyudmila Vidiasova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Felippe Cronemberger
    • 2
  • Evgenii Vidiasov
    • 1
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.University at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations