Smart City Implementation and Aspects: The Case of St. Petersburg

  • Sergey I. DrozhzhinEmail author
  • Artem V. Shiyan
  • Sergey A. Mityagin
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)


Cities in the world face the problem of combining competitiveness and sustainable development at the same time. Urban space forms a much more subtle matter in terms of the simultaneous scale and point of processes spectrum. Certainly, the city is the primary source of generation fundamental anthropogenic factors within the framework of human activity (ecology, transport, society and security). However, on the other hand, in the current realities, it also becomes a structural tools mechanism for creating qualitatively new drivers of development (for example, intelligent infrastructure networks for urban mobility or closed-loop water supply).

The city as a dynamic system has a certain set of patterns. The basic ones regulate the system development, complexity of mechanisms and diversification of modules designed. The critical ones regulate system stability and the preservation of existing stable state. Providing modularity of urban management architecture will allow scaling the interaction chain within the socio-technical system (i.e. the city), which make it possible to minimize the risk of destructive strategic decisions.

Smart city as a platform provides transparency of the urban space processes and forms a two-level management (citizen-government). An effect indicator of high technology implementation is not so much a formal achievement of indicators values, but as the parameter of the complex infrastructure regime of a certain urban area in a given chronological period.

When we have such projects of this level, the citizens themselves act as the center of aggregation of new meanings, values, and needs. On the basis of their everyday life situations, a framework of knowledge is designed for further strategic urban space planning.

The authors of this article propose to revise the traditional understanding of the concept of “smart city” and consider the case of development of St. Petersburg as a “smart city”, based on the value-oriented approach.


Smart city Value-oriented approach Urban studies Human-oriented approach 


  1. 1.
    Minelli, A., Ruffini, R.: Citizen feedback as a tool for continuous improvement in local bodies. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 31(1), 46–64 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernandez-Anez, V., Fernández-Güell, J.M., Giffinger, R.: Smart city implementation and discourses: an integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities 78, 4–16 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sikora-Fernandez, D.: Smarter cities in post-socialist country: example of Poland. Cities 78, 52–59 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, H., Singh, M.K., Gupta, M.P., Madaan, J.: Moving towards smart cities: solutions that lead to the smart city transformation framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 1–16 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kummitha, R.K.R., Crutzen, N.: How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities 67, 43–52 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borsekova, K., Koróny, S., Vaňová, A., Vitálišová, K.: Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: a research challenge with policy implications. Cities 78, 17–26 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 135–148 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mora, L., Deakin, M., Reid, A.: Strategic principles for smart city development: a multiple case study analysis of European best practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 1–28 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alawadhi, S., et al.: Building understanding of smart city initiatives. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds.) EGOV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7443, pp. 40–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandez-Anez, V.: Stakeholders approach to smart cities: a survey on smart city definitions. In: Alba, E., Chicano, F., Luque, G. (eds.) Smart-CT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9704, pp. 157–167. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haarstad, H.: Who is driving the ‘smart city’ agenda? Assessing smartness as a governance strategy for cities in Europe. In: Jones, A., Ström, P., Hermelin, B., Rusten, G. (eds.) Services and the Green Economy, pp. 199–218. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monzon, A.: Smart cities concept and challenges: bases for the assessment of smart city projects. In: International Conference Smart Cities And Green ICT Systems 2015, pp. 1–11. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braude-Zolotarev, M., Grebnev, G., Yermakov, R., Rubanov, G., Serbina, E.: Interoperability of information systems. Compendium INFO-FOSS. RU, Moscow, pp. 100–108 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Level of IT development in Russian subjects. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
  15. 15.
    Disposal of Government of St. Petersburg № 21-rp, 14 April 2017. Accessed 13 Mar 2018
  16. 16.
    Concept of Smart St. Petersburg. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ETU “LETI”Saint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations