Advertisement

Areas of Habitation in the City: Improving Urban Management Based on Check-in Data and Mental Mapping

  • Aleksandra NenkoEmail author
  • Artem Koniukhov
  • Marina Petrova
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)

Abstract

In this paper we present a study on areas of habitation in St. Petersburg, Russia, which are actively used and perceived by city dwellers as coherent units. The motivation behind the study is to define generic urban areas formed by actual user experience and different from administrative division to improve urban management of the city territory. We employ mixed methods approach to account both for users’ practices in urban space, based on analysis of check-in data, and users’ perception of urban space, based on analysis of mental maps. The clustering algorithm is based on spatial and social proximity indexes and has been validated through the results of the mental mapping survey. The dataset of check-ins is retrieved from VKontakte social network, the most popular one for St. Petersburg and for Russia, and comprises 6128 venues with 763079 check-ins collected for December 2017–February 2018 time period. The mental mapping has been conducted within 39 users of different age and gender, representing different areas of the city under study. We compare the borders of the areas of habitation with the map of administrative division, consider functional load of the areas in different areas of the city, define environmental factors which form the borders, give suggestions on how knowledge on areas of habitation could inform and improve urban management practice.

Keywords

Areas of habitation LBSN Check-in data Mental mapping Mixed methods Urban management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by The Russian Science Foundation, Agreement #17-71-30029 with co-financing of Bank Saint Petersburg.

References

  1. 1.
    Hanson, J., Hillier, B.: The architecture of community: some new proposals on the social consequences of architectural and planning decisions. Architecture et Comportement/Architecture and Behaviour 3, 251–273 (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westerink, J., Haase, D., Bauer, A., Ravetz, J., Jarrige, F., Aalbers, C.B.E.M.: Dealing with sustainability trade-offs of the compact city in peri-urban planning across European city regions. Eur. Plan. Stud. 21, 473–497 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campari, I.: Uncertain boundaries in urban space. Geog. Objects Indeterminate Boundaries 2, 57–69 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollenstein, L., Purves, R.: Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2010, 21–48 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, C., Holt, I., Green, J., Harding, J., Diamond, L.: User needs and implications for modelling vague named places. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 9, 174–194 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynch, K.: The Image of the City, vol. 11. MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M.: Naive geography. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 211–221 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratti, C., et al.: Redrawing the map of Great Britain from a network of human interactions. PLoS ONE 5, e14248 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reades, J., Calabrese, F., Ratti, C.: Eigenplaces: analysing cities using the space–time structure of the mobile phone network. Environ. Plan. 36, 824–836 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Girardin, F., Calabrese, F., Fiore, F.D., Ratti, C., Blat, J.: Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Y., Sui, Z., Kang, C., Gao, Y.: Uncovering patterns of inter-urban trip and spatial interaction from social media check-in data. PLoS ONE 9, e86026 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ying, J.J.-C., Lu, E.H.-C., Kuo, W.-N., Tseng, V.S.: Urban point-of-interest recommendation by mining user check-in behaviors. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferrari, L., Rosi, A., Mamei, M., Zambonelli, F.: Extracting urban patterns from location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, X.: Discovering spatial interaction communities from mobile phone data. Trans. GIS 17, 463–481 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoier, G., Borruso, G.: Individual movements and geographical data mining. clustering algorithms for highlighting hotspots in personal navigation routes. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6782, pp. 454–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21928-3_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eagle, N., Pentland, A.S.: Eigenbehaviors: identifying structure in routine. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1057–1066 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, P.: A framework for mining sequential patterns from spatio-temporal event data sets. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 20, 433–448 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cranshaw, J., Schwartz, R., Hong, J., Sadeh, N.: The livehoods project: utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city. In: Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., Zook, M.: Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape Urban Plan. 142, 198–211 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phung, D., Adams, B., Venkatesh, S.: Computable social patterns from sparse sensor data. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Location and the Web (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferrari, L., Mamei, M.: Discovering daily routines from Google latitude with topic models. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops) (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farrahi, K., Gatica-Perez, D.: Discovering routines from large-scale human locations using probabilistic topic models. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2, 3 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandra Nenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Artem Koniukhov
    • 1
  • Marina Petrova
    • 1
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations