Aboveground Species Diversity and Carbon Stocks in Smallholder Coffee Agroforestry in the Highlands of Uganda

  • Namaalwa JustineEmail author
  • Balaba Susan Tumwebaze
  • Kigonya Ritah
  • Gorettie Nabanoga
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


Types of agroforestry systems and their capacity to sequester carbon vary globally, and the extent of carbon sequestered greatly depends on environmental conditions and system management. This study aimed at investigating the species composition and determining the aboveground carbon stocks of coffee agroforests at low (1240–1320 m a.s.l.) and medium (1321–1504 m a.s.l.) elevations of Manafwa District in Uganda. For each elevation, the agroforest structures were described and the aboveground carbon (AGC) stocks estimated using allometric models for all measured shade and coffee trees. Two coffee varieties were cultivated with SL-14 extending up to 40 years, while LWIL-11, a more recently introduced variety, extended up to 7 years only. Therefore, the estimated AGC stocks were significantly greater for the SL-14 (0.250–2.317 tons ha−1) than LWIL-11 (1.044–2.099 tons ha−1) and were significantly higher at the medium versus the low elevation. The analysis for shade trees indicated no significant differences in the species diversity for the elevation sites, but with significant variations in mean DBH and thus AGC stocks. Farms at low elevation were characterized by smaller (2.037 ± 0.131 tCO2e ha−1) and significantly high (2.037 ± 0.131 tCO2e ha−1) mean AGC stocks per unit area for coffee and shade trees, respectively, as compared to the medium elevation farms. While the variation in the coffee trees within the elevation sites could be attributed to the uneven distribution within the age groups, the AGC stocks in the shade trees were attributed to the generally large sizes of the trees that dominated. Irrespective of the differences in elevation attributes, coffee agroforests can potentially provide carbon sinks and thus contribute to climate change mitigation.


Carbon sequestration Coffee agroforest Coffee-banana Uganda 


  1. Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99(1–3):15–27. Scholar
  2. Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For Res 2:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buyinza J, Tumwebaze, SB, Namaalwa J, Byakagaba P (2014) Above-ground biomass and carbon stocks of different land cover types in Mt. Elgon, Eastern Uganda. International Journal Of Research On Land-Use Sustainability, 1(2):51–61Google Scholar
  4. Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A, Chidumayo E, Colgan MS, Delitti WBC, Duque A, et al. (2014). Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Chang Biol 20(10):3177–3190Google Scholar
  5. Dixon R (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116. Scholar
  6. Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263(5144):185–190. Scholar
  7. Ehrenbergerová L, Cienciala E, Kučera A, Guy L, Habrová H (2016) Carbon stock in agroforestry coffee plantations with different shade trees in Villa Rica, Peru. Agrofor Syst 90(3):433–445. Scholar
  8. Girardin CAJ, Malhi Y, AragãO LEOC, Mamani M, Huaraca Huasco W, Durand L, Feeley KJ, Rapp J, Silva-Espejo JE, Silman M, Salinas N, Whittaker RJ (2010) Net primary productivity allocation and cycling of carbon along a tropical forest elevational transect in the Peruvian Andes: net primary productivity from Andes to Amazon. Glob Change Biol 16(12):3176–3192. Scholar
  9. Gwali S, Agaba H, Balitta P, Hafashimana D, Nkandu J, Kuria A, Pinard F, Sinclair F (2015) Tree species diversity and abundance in coffee farms adjacent to areas of different disturbance histories in Mabira forest system, central Uganda. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 11(4):309–317. Scholar
  10. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: generic methodologies applicable to multiple land-use categoriesGoogle Scholar
  11. Kabiru S, Hassan S, Umar U, Musab I (2018) An inventory of agroforestry practices in Butta Sub-County, Manafwa District, Uganda. Asian J Environ Ecol 5(4):1–7. Scholar
  12. Kimaiyo J, Kiptot E, Tanui J, Oduol J, Kegode H, Isubukalu P, Buyinza J, Chemangei A, Nyangas S, Okia C (2017) Livelihood analysis of households in Manafwa and Kapchorwa. World Agroforestry Centre, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  13. Kyarikunda M, Nyamukuru A, Mulindwa D, Tabuti JRS (2017) Agroforestry and management of trees in Bunya County, Mayuge District, Uganda. Int J For Res 2017:1–9. Scholar
  14. Liebig T, Babin R, Ribeyre F, Läderach P, van Asten P, Poehling H-M, Jassogne L, Cilas C, Avelino J (2018) Local and regional drivers of the African coffee white stem borer ( Monochamus leuconotus ) in Uganda: Local and regional drivers of M. leuconotus. Agric For Entomol 20:514. Scholar
  15. Locatelli B, Brockhaus M, Buck A, Thompson I (2010) Forests and adaptation to climate change: challenges and opportunities. IUFROGoogle Scholar
  16. Lorenz K, Lal R (2010) The importance of carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. In: Lorenz K, Lal R (eds) Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 241–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T, Dietz J (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manjunatha M, Devakumar A, Nivedita M, Kushalappa C (2017) Carbon stock present in dominant tree species of coffee based agroforestry system. Int J Agrofor Silvic 5(5):311–314Google Scholar
  19. Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295Google Scholar
  20. Mugagga F (2017) Perceptions and response actions of smallholder coffee farmers to climate variability in montane ecosystems. Environ Ecol Res 5(5):357–366. Scholar
  21. Mugagga F, Buyinza M, Kakembo V (2010) Livelihood diversification strategies and soil erosion on Mount Elgon, Eastern Uganda. A socio-economic perspective. Environ Res J 4(4):272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mugagga F, Kakembo V, Buyinza M (2012) Land use changes on the slopes of Mount Elgon and the implications for the occurrence of landslides. Catena 90:39–46. Scholar
  23. Mukadasi B, Kaboggoza JR, Nabalegwa M (2007) Agroforestry practices in the buffer zone area of Mt Elgon National Park, eastern Uganda. Afr J Ecol 45(s3):48–53. Scholar
  24. Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 71(1):43–54. Scholar
  25. MWE (2015) Economic assessment of the impacts of climate change in Uganda; Arabica coffee production in the Mount Elgon region (Bududa District). Ministry of Water and Environment, KampalaGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakakaawa C, Aune J, Vedeld P (2010) Changes in carbon stocks and tree diversity in agro-ecosystems in south western Uganda: what role for carbon sequestration payments? New For 40(1):19–44. Scholar
  27. Oelbermann M, Paul Voroney R, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(3):359–377. Scholar
  28. Pandey DN (2002) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Clim Pol 2(4):367–377Google Scholar
  29. Ramachandran Nair PK, Nair VD, Mohan Kumar B, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron (108):237–307Google Scholar
  30. Ruark GA, Schoeneberger MM, Nair PKR (2003) Agroforestry–helping to achieve sustainable forest management. UNFF (United Nations Forum for Forests) intersessional experts meeting on the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management, 24–30 March 2003, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmitt-Harsh M, Evans TP, Castellanos E, Randolph JC (2012) Carbon stocks in coffee agroforests and mixed dry tropical forests in the western highlands of Guatemala. Agrofor Syst 86(2):141–157. Scholar
  32. Schroeder P (1994) Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 27(1):89–97. Scholar
  33. Scott P (1994) An assessment of natural resource use by communities from Mt. Elgon National Park. UNDPGoogle Scholar
  34. Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto M, Mendoza J, Ferrer GJ, de Jong B (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 78(1):39–51. Scholar
  35. Tumwebaze SB, Byakagaba P (2016) Soil organic carbon stocks under coffee agroforestry systems and coffee monoculture in Uganda. Agric Ecosyst Environ 216:188–193. Scholar
  36. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath N, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) Land use land-use change, and forestry. International Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Namaalwa Justine
    • 1
    Email author
  • Balaba Susan Tumwebaze
    • 1
  • Kigonya Ritah
    • 1
  • Gorettie Nabanoga
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations