Advertisement

Operational Modal Analysis of a Thin-Walled Rocket Nozzle Using Phase-Based Image Processing and Complexity Pursuit

  • Marc A. EitnerEmail author
  • Benjamin G. Miller
  • Jayant Sirohi
  • Charles E. Tinney
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

In this work, the modal parameters of a reduced scale, thin-walled, metallic rocket nozzle are extracted through Operational Modal Analysis (OMA). The specimen is excited using pressurized gas from a rocket nozzle test stand. Deformation of the nozzle lip is measured using a non-contact optical technique consisting of two-dimensional marker tracking in conjunction with phase-based motion amplification. OMA methods that use digital image data suffer from low signal to noise ratios (SNR), especially in higher modes with small amplitude vibrations. The structural displacements are often on a subpixel scale and therefore difficult to analyze without additional image processing. Phase-based motion amplification (PMA) offers a possible solution to this problem by magnifying subpixel motion. This work focuses on the implementation of the technique in a marker-tracking algorithm, which serves to extract the time-history of high-contrast markers placed on a large area ratio nozzle with a 5.3 inch exit diameter. Grayscale images taken with a high-speed camera are first processed with the phase-based algorithm to increase the marker motion in a certain broad frequency band. This results in a set of modified images, which are then analyzed with a tracking algorithm that identifies centroid positions of fluorescent markers. The time-history of these markers is then used as input for an OMA algorithm, namely the Complexity Pursuit algorithm, which leads to estimates of eigenfrequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes. A quantitative comparison between the modal parameters obtained with and without additional motion magnification is provided. Results of a numerical simulation are provided that demonstrate the improvement of estimated modal parameters. The modal parameters of the first six modes of the nozzle are found using this method. The motion was amplified in the range of 0–1400 Hz which includes the six eigenfrequencies. Without application of the broad band PMA, the highest mode cannot clearly be identified and the quality of the other modes decreases.

Keywords

Operational modal analysis Phase based motion estimation Complexity pursuit Blind source separation Optical vibration measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. John Valdez of the Applied Research Laboratories of The University of Texas at Austin for assisting with the experimental measurements.

References

  1. 1.
    Baars, W.J., Tinney, C.E., Ruf, J.H., Brown, A.M., McDaniels, D.M.: Wall pressure unsteadiness and side loads in overexpanded rocket nozzles. AIAA J. 50(1), 61–73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baars, W.J., Tinney, C.E., Ruf, J.H.: Non-stationary shock motion unsteadiness in an axisymmetric geometry with pressure gradient. Exp. Fluids. 56(92), 1–18 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blades, E.L., Luke, E.A., Ruf, J.: Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of rocket engine side loads. 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2012–3969, Atlanta, Georgia, 30July–1 Aug 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinney, C.E., Scott, K., Routen, M., Sirohi, J., Ruf, J.: Effect of aeroelasticity on vibroacoustic loads during startup of large area ratio nozzles. 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2017-3361, Denver, Colorado, 5–9 June 2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stone, J.V.: Blind source separation using temporal predictability. Neural Comput. 13(7), 1559–1574 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wadhwa, N., Rubenstein, M., Fredo, D., Freeman, W.T.: Phase-based video motion processing. ACM Trans. Graph. 32(4), 80:1–80:10 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poozesh, P., Sarrafi, A., Mao, Z., Avitabile, P., Niezrecki, C.: Feasibility of extracting operating shapes using phase-based motion magnification technique and stereo-photogrammetry. J. Sound Vib. 407, 350–366 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, Y., Dorn, C., Mancini, T., Talken, Z., Kenyon, G., Farrar, C., Mascarenas, D.: Blind identification of full-field vibration modes from video measurements with phase-based video motion magnification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 85, 567–590 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simoncelli, E.P., Freeman, W.T.: The steerable pyramid: a flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In: Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Image Processing, Washington, DC, 23–26 Oct 1995Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simoncelli, E.P., Freeman, W.T., Adelson, E.H., Heeger, D.J.: Shiftable multi-scale transforms. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 38(2), 587–607 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meirovitch, L.: Fundamentals of Vibration. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valdez, J.A., Tinney, C.E.: Measurements of a Mach 3 jet using high-speed optical flow techniques. AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2018-3148, Atlanta, Georgia, 25–29 June 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc A. Eitner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benjamin G. Miller
    • 1
  • Jayant Sirohi
    • 1
  • Charles E. Tinney
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at Austin, Applied Research LaboratoriesAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations