Children enter kindergarten with considerable differences in numeracy (Jordan et al. in Dev Psychol 45(3), 850–867, 2009). These differences, prior to formal schooling, may not initially seem important. However, kindergarten numeracy skills predict later mathematics achievement and general academic achievement (Duncan et al. in Dev Psychol 43(6), 1428–1446, 2007; Romano et al. in Dev Psychol 46(5), 995–1007, 2010). Children who enter school with poor numeracy skills do not catch up (Aunola et al. in Journal of Educational Psychol, 096(4), 699–713, 2004), likely due to the lack of early identification and intervention tools. Poor numeracy skills are a serious long-term concern; numeracy is at least as important as literacy for employment outcomes, including obtaining and retaining a job, and income level (Bynner and Parsons in Does Numeracy Matter? Evidence from the National Child Development Study on the Impact of Poor Numeracy on Adult Life. The Basic Skills Agency, London, England 1997; Parsons and Bynner in Educ Train, 39(2), 43–51, 1997; Ritchie and Bates in Psychol Sci 24(7), 1301–1308, 2013). Thus, research focused on developing tools to assess and improve children’s numeracy skills early on is critical. Using research from longitudinal studies, we identified cognitive predictors of numeracy skills. Evidence-based early screening tools, which allow teachers and researchers to predict, in kindergarten, which children will struggle to gain numeracy skills are also identified. Finally, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of early school-based interventions are provided and applied to existing early numeracy interventions for at-risk students. This interdisciplinary work, combining findings from education, cognitive science, and psychology, has direct applications for early identification, instruction, and intervention in the classroom, with the goal of improving the long-term outcomes of students.
Kindergarten Mathematics Numeracy Screener Intervention At risk Evidence-based Efficacy Quantitative Working memory Linguistic
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
Agus, M., Mascia, M. L., Fastame, M. C., Melis, V., Pilloni, M. C., & Penna, M. P. (2015). The measurement of enhancement in mathematical abilities as a result of joint cognitive trainings in numerical and visual-spatial skills: A preliminary study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 588(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/588/1/012041.Google Scholar
Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J. … Hulme, C. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (1997). Does numeracy matter? evidence from the national child development study on the impact of poor numeracy on adult life. London, England: The Basic Skills Agency.Google Scholar
Cockcroft, W. H. (Chairman). (1982). Mathematics counts (Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools). London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Connolly, A. J. (2000). KeyMath-revised/updated Canadian norms. Richmond Hill, ON: PsyCan.Google Scholar
De Smedt, B., Noël, M. P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education,2(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2010). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dowker, A. (2016). Factors that influence improvement in numeracy, reading, and comprehension in the context of a numeracy intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01929.
Fawcett, A., & Reid, G. (2009). Alternative and innovative interventions for dyslexia: A critical commentary. In G. Reid (Ed.), The Routledge companion to Dyslexia (pp. 157–174). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuch, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities,39(5), 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byed-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/stable/4620706.
Hornung, C., Schiltz, C., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2014). Predicting first-grade mathematics achievement: The contributions of domain-general cognitive abilities, nonverbal number sense, and early number competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00272.
Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science,23(6), 572–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, S., & Hume, T. (2014a). Pathspan [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://hume.ca/ix/.
Hume, S., & Hume, T. (2014b). Test Runner [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://hume.ca/ix/.
Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2014). Number sense interventions. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2016). Catching math problems early: Findings from the number sense intervention project. In A. Henik (Ed.), Continuous issues in numerical cognition: How many or how much? (pp. 59–79). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2012). Number sense screener (NSS). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2008). A number sense assessment tool for identifying children at risk for mathematical difficulties. In A. Dowker (Ed.), Mathematical difficulties: Psychology and intervention (pp. 45–58). (n.p.): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,103(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. W. (2007). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
McKenzie, B., Bull, R., & Gray, C. (2003). The effects of phonological and visual-spatial interference on children’s arithmetical performance. Educational and Child Psychology,20(3), 93–108.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Koponen, T., & Aro, M. (2015). A review of early numeracy interventions for children at risk in mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 25–54. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.107993.
Orsini, A., Grossi, D., Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1987). Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences,8(6), 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology,108(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S. S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,47(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, F., Singleton, C., & Horne, J. (2008). Brief report—phonological awareness and visual-spatial sketchpad functioning predict early arithmetic attainment: Evidence from a longitudinal study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,20(4), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701614922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacy, S. T., Cartwright, M., Arwood, Z., Canfield, J. P., & Kloos, H. (2017). Addressing the math-practice gap in elementary school: Are tablets a feasible tool for informal math practice? Frontiers in Psychology, 8(179). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00179.