Advertisement

Early Identification of, and Interventions for, Kindergarten Students at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties

  • Marcie PennerEmail author
  • Chad Buckland
  • Michael Moes
Chapter
  • 322 Downloads

Abstract

Children enter kindergarten with considerable differences in numeracy (Jordan et al. in Dev Psychol 45(3), 850–867, 2009). These differences, prior to formal schooling, may not initially seem important. However, kindergarten numeracy skills predict later mathematics achievement and general academic achievement (Duncan et al. in Dev Psychol 43(6), 1428–1446, 2007; Romano et al. in Dev Psychol 46(5), 995–1007, 2010). Children who enter school with poor numeracy skills do not catch up (Aunola et al. in Journal of Educational Psychol, 096(4), 699–713, 2004), likely due to the lack of early identification and intervention tools. Poor numeracy skills are a serious long-term concern; numeracy is at least as important as literacy for employment outcomes, including obtaining and retaining a job, and income level (Bynner and Parsons in Does Numeracy Matter? Evidence from the National Child Development Study on the Impact of Poor Numeracy on Adult Life. The Basic Skills Agency, London, England 1997; Parsons and Bynner in Educ Train, 39(2), 43–51, 1997; Ritchie and Bates in Psychol Sci 24(7), 1301–1308, 2013). Thus, research focused on developing tools to assess and improve children’s numeracy skills early on is critical. Using research from longitudinal studies, we identified cognitive predictors of numeracy skills. Evidence-based early screening tools, which allow teachers and researchers to predict, in kindergarten, which children will struggle to gain numeracy skills are also identified. Finally, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of early school-based interventions are provided and applied to existing early numeracy interventions for at-risk students. This interdisciplinary work, combining findings from education, cognitive science, and psychology, has direct applications for early identification, instruction, and intervention in the classroom, with the goal of improving the long-term outcomes of students.

Keywords

Kindergarten Mathematics Numeracy Screener Intervention At risk Evidence-based Efficacy Quantitative Working memory Linguistic 

Notes

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

References

  1. Agus, M., Mascia, M. L., Fastame, M. C., Melis, V., Pilloni, M. C., & Penna, M. P. (2015). The measurement of enhancement in mathematical abilities as a result of joint cognitive trainings in numerical and visual-spatial skills: A preliminary study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 588(1).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/588/1/012041.Google Scholar
  2. Ansari, D., De Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2012). Neuroeducation—A critical overview of an emerging field. Neuroethics, 5(2), 105–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M., & Nurmi, J. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713.  https://doi.org/10.1073/0022-0663.96.4.699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartelet, D., Vaessen, A., Blomert, L., & Ansari, D. (2014). What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 12–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J. … Hulme, C. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges, M. S., & Catts, H. W. (2011). The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 330–338.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (1997). Does numeracy matter? evidence from the national child development study on the impact of poor numeracy on adult life. London, England: The Basic Skills Agency.Google Scholar
  9. Chodura, S., Juhn, J., & Holling, H. (2015). Interventions for children with mathematical difficulties: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(2), 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cirino, P. T. (2011). The interrelationships of mathematical precursors in kindergarten. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(4), 713–733.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333(6045), 968–970.Google Scholar
  12. Clarren, S. B., Martin, D. C., & Townes, B. D. (1993). Academic achievement over a decade: A neuropsychological prediction study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9(3–4), 161–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649309540550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cockcroft, W. H. (Chairman). (1982). Mathematics counts (Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools). London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  14. Connolly, A. J. (2000). KeyMath-revised/updated Canadian norms. Richmond Hill, ON: PsyCan.Google Scholar
  15. De Smedt, B., Noël, M. P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2009). The reductive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(4), 469–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2010). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 64–81.  https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowker, A. (2016). Factors that influence improvement in numeracy, reading, and comprehension in the context of a numeracy intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01929.
  19. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test–III [Measurement instrument]. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  21. Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., Beliakoff, A., & Hassinger-Das, B. (2015). A kindergarten number-sense intervention with contrasting practice conditions for low-achieving children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 331–370.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2013). A number sense intervention for low income kindergartners at risk for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 166–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fawcett, A., & Reid, G. (2009). Alternative and innovative interventions for dyslexia: A critical commentary. In G. Reid (Ed.), The Routledge companion to Dyslexia (pp. 157–174). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Frye, D., Barooody, A. J., Burchinal, M., Carver. S. M., Jordan, N. C., & McDowell, J. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (NNCEE 2014-4005). Washington, DC: US Department of Education and Regional Assistance. Available from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/early_math_pg_111313.pdf.
  25. Fuchs, L. S., Fuch, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 311–330. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lond95336&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA160331975&sid=summon&asid=37008b001648e22005fe5c7bf8a6da13.
  27. Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K, & Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24(4),  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byed-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/stable/4620706.
  29. Geary D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS ONE, 8(1),  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hassinger-Das, B., Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2015). Reading stories to learn math: Mathematics vocabulary instruction for children with early numeracy difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 242–246.  https://doi.org/10.1086/683986.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hicks, M. J., & Devaraj, S. (2017). The myth and the reality of manufacturing in America. Muncie, IN: Ball State University.Google Scholar
  33. Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12(4), F9–F15.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hornung, C., Schiltz, C., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2014). Predicting first-grade mathematics achievement: The contributions of domain-general cognitive abilities, nonverbal number sense, and early number competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00272.
  35. Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hume, S., & Hume, T. (2014a). Pathspan [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://hume.ca/ix/.
  37. Hume, S., & Hume, T. (2014b). Test Runner [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://hume.ca/ix/.
  38. Institute of Education Sciences. (2014). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version3.0). Available from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf.
  39. Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2014). Number sense interventions. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  40. Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2016). Catching math problems early: Findings from the number sense intervention project. In A. Henik (Ed.), Continuous issues in numerical cognition: How many or how much? (pp. 59–79). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2012). Number sense screener (NSS). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  42. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., & Irwin, C. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 647–660.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2008). A number sense assessment tool for identifying children at risk for mathematical difficulties. In A. Dowker (Ed.), Mathematical difficulties: Psychology and intervention (pp. 45–58). (n.p.): Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010a). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Ramineni, C., & Watkins, M. W. (2010b). Validating a number sense screening tool for use in kindergarten and first grade: Prediction of mathematics proficiency in third grade. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 181–195. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lond95336&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA233050811&sid=summon&asid=4b0bb7c47d1bc0864fdfe88656fedac4.
  46. Jordan, N. C., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (1992). Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle- and low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 644–653.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77(1), 153–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 516–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kroesbergen, E. H., van ‘t Noordende, J., & Kolkman, M. (2014). Training working memory in kindergarten children: Effects on working memory and early numeracy. Child Neuropsychology, 20(1), 23–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2012.736483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, K., & Bull, R. (2015). Developmental changes in working memory, updating, and math achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 869–882.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LeFevre, J.-A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Bisanz, J., Jamawar, D., et al. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81(6), 1753–1767.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lembke, E., & Forgan, A. (2009). Identifying early numeracy indicators for kindergarten and first-grade students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(1), 12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01273.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lyons, I. M., Bugden, S., Zheng, S., De Jesus, S., & Ansari, D. (2017). Symbolic number skills predict growth in nonsymbolic number skills in kindergarteners. Developmental psychology. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martin, R. B., Cirino, P. T., Sharp, C., & Barnes, M. (2014). Number and counting skills in kindergarten as predictors of grade 1 mathematical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 12–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Mazzocco, M. M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 318–323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mazzocco, M. M., & Myers, G. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 218–253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0011-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Mazzocco, M. M., & Thompson, R. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 142–155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00129.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A., & Woodcock, R. W. (2007). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. McKenzie, B., Bull, R., & Gray, C. (2003). The effects of phonological and visual-spatial interference on children’s arithmetical performance. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(3), 93–108.Google Scholar
  61. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer” evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Koponen, T., & Aro, M. (2015). A review of early numeracy interventions for children at risk in mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 25–54.  https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.107993.
  65. Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Nadler, R. T., & Archibald, L. M. (2014). The assessment of verbal and visuospatial working memory with school age Canadian children. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 38(3), 262–279. Retrieved from http://cjslpa.ca/files/2014_CJSLPA_Vol_38/CJSLPA_Fall_2014_Vol_38_No_3.pdf#page=8.
  67. Nosworthy, N., Bugden, S., Archibald, L., Evans, B., & Ansari, D. (2013). A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children’s arithmetic competence. PLoS ONE, 8(7),  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orsini, A., Grossi, D., Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1987). Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 8(6), 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (1997). Numeracy and employment. Education and Training, 39(2), 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00400919710164125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more?. London, England: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.Google Scholar
  71. Passolunghi, M. C., & Lanfranchi, S. (2012). Domain-specific and domain-general precursors of mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 42–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02039.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 455–473.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Purpura, D. J., & Ganley, C. M. (2014). Working memory and language: Skill-specific or domain-general relations to mathematics? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 122, 104–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Raghubar, K. P., & Barnes, M. A. (2017). Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: A review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(2), 329–351.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1259387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(2), 375–394.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rasmussen, C., & Bisanz, J. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(2), 137–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301–1308.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Romano, E., Babchishin, L., Pagani, L. S., & Kohen, D. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: Replication and extension using a nationwide Canadian survey. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 995–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Salminen, J., Koponen, T., Räsänen, P., & Aro, M. (2015). Preventive support for kindergarteners most at-risk for mathematics difficulties: Computer-assisted intervention. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(4), 273–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.1083837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Savage, R., & Carless, S. (2004). Predicting curriculum and test performance at age 7 years from pupil background, baseline skills and phonological awareness at age 5. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 155–171.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S. S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3).  https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simmons, F., Singleton, C., & Horne, J. (2008). Brief report—phonological awareness and visual-spatial sketchpad functioning predict early arithmetic attainment: Evidence from a longitudinal study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 711–722.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701614922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—what works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sowinski, C., LeFevre, J.-A., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Kamawar, D., Bisanz, J., & Smith-Chant, B. (2015). Refining the quantitative pathway of the pathways to mathematics model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 73–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Stacy, S. T., Cartwright, M., Arwood, Z., Canfield, J. P., & Kloos, H. (2017). Addressing the math-practice gap in elementary school: Are tablets a feasible tool for informal math practice? Frontiers in Psychology8(179).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00179.
  89. Toll, S. W. M., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2016). Visual working memory and number sense: Testing the double deficit hypothesis in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 429–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Toll, S. W. M., & Van Luit, J. E. (2013). Accelerating the early numeracy development of kindergartners with limited working memory skills through remedial education. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 745–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Toll, S. W. M., Viersen, S. V., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2015). The development of (non-)symbolic comparison skills throughout kindergarten and their relations with basic mathematical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Trick, L. M., Enns, J. T., & Brodeur, D. A. (1996). Life span changes in visual enumeration: The number discrimination task. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 925–932.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vanbinst, K., Ansari, D., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2016). Symbolic numerical magnitude processing is as important to arithmetic as phonological awareness is to reading. PLoS ONE, 11(3).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processing [Measurement instrument]. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  95. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wechsler, D. (2001). WIAT-II abbreviated: Wechsler individual achievement test [Measurement instrument]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  97. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational battery-revised [Measurement instrument]. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.Google Scholar
  98. Xenidou-Dervou, I., Molenaar, D., Ansari, D., van der Schoot, M., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2016). Nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude comparison skills as longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement. Learning and Instruction, 50, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKing’s University College at Western UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyKing’s University College at Western UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations