Reshaping Seed Sovereignty
This chapter provides a synopsis of the key findings of the study. It suggests that transformationalism is a useful framework for assessing changes in seed practices in sub-Saharan Africa and argues that hyperglobalist seed laws and practices can be avoided if there is sufficient political will. It ends with a call for decisive action to generate more equitable outcomes in the seed space. It identifies four areas for immediate action: (1) The revision of international seed law and policies; (2) the evaluation of all existing and proposed domestic seed laws and policies; (3) the expansion of community seed banks; and (4) the development of evolutionary breeding systems that will generate genetic variability that could become central to national programmes for future-proofing for climate change.
KeywordsSeed sovereignty Seed laws Community seed banks Genetic variability
- Coordination Sud. 2017. The right to seeds: a fundamental right for small farmers! Paris, France: Coordination Sud.Google Scholar
- De Boef, W.S., Thijssen, M.H., Shrestha, P., Subedi, A., Feyissa, R., Gezu, G., Canci, A., Ferreira, M.A.J.D.F., Dias, T., Swain, S. and Sthapit, B.R. 2012. Moving beyond the dilemma: practices that contribute to the on-farm management of agrobiodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36, pp. 788–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Jonge, B. 2014. Plant variety protection in sub-saharan Africa: balancing commercial and smallholder farmers’ interests. Journal of Politics and Law, 7 (3), pp. 100–111.Google Scholar
- De Schutter, O. 2009. Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation report of the Special Rapporteur. A/64/170 United Nations General Assembly [Online]. Available from: http://farmersrights.org/pdf/righttofood-n0942473.pdf [Accessed 23 February 2013].
- DIVERSIFOOD. 2018. DIVERSIFOOD Report: Community Seed Banks in Europe. DIVERSIFOOD stakeholder workshop in Rome on 21 September 2017. Available at: http://www.diversifood.eu/community-seed-banks-in-europe/. Accessed 26 December 2018.
- Dutfield, G. 2011. Food, biological diversity and intellectual property: the role of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). Intellectual Property Issue, Paper No.9. Quaker United Nations Office.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2011. Potential effects of climate change on crop pollination. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Feyissa, R. 2006. Farmers’ rights in Ethiopia: a case study. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar
- Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2007. Globalisation/anti-globalisation: beyond the great divide. 2nd edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a crossroads: a synthesis of the global and sub-global IAASTD reports. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, S. 2014. Expanding the possibilities for a future free of hunger. Dialogues in Human Geography [Online], 4(2), pp. 225–228. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2043820614537166 [Accessed 26th September 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nagoya Protocol. 2010. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Quebec: Secetariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme.Google Scholar
- SPVAA. 2012. Seeds and Plant Varieties (Amendment) Act, 2012 (No. 53 of 2012). Nairobi: Kenya Gazette Supplement, No. 217.Google Scholar
- UN International Declaration of Peasants’ Rights. 2012. Final study on the advancement of the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas. Geneva: United Nation A/HRC/AC/8/6. Available at: http://www.wphna.org/htdocs/downloadsfeb2013/2012%20Declaration%20of%20Peasants%27%20Rights.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2019.
- Worede, M. 2011. Establishing a community seed supply system: community seed bank complexes in Africa. IN: Li Ching, L., Edwards, S., Scialabba, N. E. (eds.) Climate change and food systems resilience in sub-Saharan Africas. Rome. Italy: FAO, pp. 361–377.Google Scholar