Advertisement

Seed Sovereignty and Globalisation

  • Clare O’Grady WalsheEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This chapter begins by distinguishing between the concepts of food security, or access to sufficient food to eat, and food sovereignty, or the right to choose which food to eat. It then distinguishes between the concepts of seed security, or an adequate supply of seed for cultivation, and seed sovereignty, meaning the farmers’ right to choose which seeds to sow, share and save. It discusses a number of threats to seed sovereignty from the process of globalisation, including climate change, changes to farming practice, transnational corporations and philanthrocapitalist organisations. It then applies hyperglobalist, sceptical, and transformational approaches to the study of how globalisation has affected seed sovereignty.

Keywords

Food security Food sovereignty Seed security Seed sovereignty 

References

  1. ACB. 2015. The expansion of the commercial seed sector in sub-Saharan Africa: major players, key issues and trends [Online]. Available from: www.acbio.org.za [Accessed 3rd February 2016].
  2. ACB. 2017. The Bayer-Monsanto merger: implications for South Africa’s agricultural future and its smallholder farmers [Online]. Available from: http://acbio.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Bayer-Monsanto-report.pdf [Accessed 4th March 2017].
  3. Acharya, A. 2011. Human security. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 478–493.Google Scholar
  4. AFSA and GRAIN. 2015. Land and seed laws under attack, who is pushing changes in Africa? [Online]. Available from: http://www.grain.org [Accessed 22nd January 2016].
  5. Alden, C. 2007. China in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  6. Alemu, D. 2011. The political economy of Ethiopian cereal seed systems: state control, market liberalisation and decentralisation. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
  7. Altieri, M.A. 2009. Agroecology, small farms and food sovereignty. Monthly Review [Online]. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/openview/98165d33d3bec3c0f47ca6821e49eef0/1, 61(3), pp. 102–113 [Accessed 6th December 2010].
  8. Amanor, K.S. 2011. From farmer participation to pro-poor seed markets: the political economy of commercial cereal seed networks in Ghana. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 48–58.Google Scholar
  9. Berne Declaration. 2013. Agropoly: a handful of corporations control world food production. Zurich, Switzerland: Berne Declaration & EcoNexus.Google Scholar
  10. Berne Declaration. 2014. Owning seeds, accessing food, a human rights impact assessment of UPOV 1991. Based on case studies in Kenya, Peru and the Philippines. Zurich, Switzerland: Berne Declaration.Google Scholar
  11. Carmody, P. 2011. The new scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Carolan, M. 2012. The sociology of food and agriculture. Earthscan Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Cerny, P. 2010. Rethinking world politics, a theory of transnational neopluralism. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  14. Chinsinga, B. 2011. Seeds and subsidies: the political economy of input programmes in Malawi. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  15. Clapp, J. 2014. Food security and food sovereignty: getting past the binary. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2) 206–211.Google Scholar
  16. Coordination Sud. 2017. The right to seeds: a fundamental right for small farmers! Paris, France: Coordination Sud.Google Scholar
  17. Da Via, E. 2012. Seed diversity, farmers’ rights, and the politics of repeasantisation. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19 (2), pp. 229–242.Google Scholar
  18. De Jonge, B. 2014. Plant variety protection in sub-Saharan Africa: balancing commercial and smallholder farmers’ interests. Journal of Politics and Law, 7 (3), pp. 100–111.Google Scholar
  19. De Schutter, O. 2009. Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation report of the Special Rapporteur. A/64/170 United Nations General Assembly [Online]. Available from: http://farmersrights.org/pdf/righttofood-n0942473.pdf [Accessed 23rd February 2013].
  20. Downes, G. 2003. Implications of TRIPS for food security in the majority world [Online]. Available from: http://comhlamh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Implications-of-Trips-for-Food-Security.pdf [Accessed 10th April 2017].
  21. Dutfield, G. 2011. Food, biological diversity and intellectual property: the role of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). Intellectual Property Issue, Paper No.9. Quaker United Nations Office.Google Scholar
  22. Edelman, M. 2014. Food sovereignty: forgotten genealogies and future regulatory challenges. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), pp. 959–978.Google Scholar
  23. Esquinas-Alcazar, J. 2005. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nature, 6, pp. 946–953, www.nature.com/reviews/genetics.Google Scholar
  24. ETC (Erosion, Technology and Concentration Group). 2009. Who will feed us? Questions for the food and climate crises [Online]. Available from: http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/web_who_will_feed_us_with_notes_0.pdf [Accessed 1stFebruary 2012].
  25. ETC (Erosion, Technology and Concentration Group). 2010. Capturing climate genes. Gene giants stockpile ‘climate-ready’ patents [Online]. Available from: http://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-giants-stockpile-patents-“climateready”-crops-bid-become-biomassters-0 [Accessed 1st February 2012].
  26. Evans, P. 2008. Is an alternative globalisation possible? Politics and Society, 36(271), pp. 271–305.Google Scholar
  27. FAO. 1983. World food security: a reappraisal of the concepts and approaches. Director General’s Report: Rome. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. FAO. 1996. Rome Declaration on world food security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. World Food Summit, Rome 13–17 November. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  29. FAO. 2003. Trade reforms and food security: conceptualising the linkages. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  30. FAO. 2006. Food Security. FAO Policy Brief, June 2006, Issue 2. Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/faoitaly/documents/pdf/pdf_Food_Security_Cocept_Note.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  31. FAO. 2009. Proceedings of the second World Seed Conference. Responding to the challenges of a changing world: The role of new plant varieties and high quality seed in agriculture. FAO Headquarters, Rome, September 8–10 [Online]. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/014/am490e/am490e00.pdf [Accessed 11th May 2013]. Rome: FAO.
  32. FAO. 2010. The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture [Online]. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/i1500e.pdf [Accessed 19th December 2015] Rome: FAO.
  33. FAO. 2011. Potential effects of climate change on crop pollination. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  34. FAO. 2014. The state of food and agriculture. Innovation in family farming [Online]. Available from: www.fao.org/publications/sofa/2014/en [Accessed 11th May 2013]. Rome: FAO.
  35. FAO. 2015. The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  36. FAO. 2016. Climate change and food security: risks and responses. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  37. Focus on the Global South and GRAIN. 2004. Iraq’s new patent law: a declaration of war against farmers [Online]. Available from: https://www.grain.org/article/entries/150-iraq-s-new-patent-law-a-declaration-of-war-against-farmers [Accessed 31st March 2017].
  38. Future Agricultures. 2014. Emerging seed markets: the role of Brazilian, Chinese and Indian seeds in African agriculture. Future Agricultures Policy Brief 79, October 2014 [Online]. Available from: www.future-agriculture.org. [Accessed 3rd August 2015].
  39. Gates Foundation and AGRA. 2015. Investing in agriculture to reduce poverty and hunger [Online]. Available from: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Resources/Grantee-Profiles/Grantee-Profile-Alliance-for-a-Green-Revolution-in-Africa-AGRA [Accessed 21stOctober 2015].
  40. George, S. 2015. Shadow sovereigns—how global corporations are seizing power. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gilpin, R. 2001. Global political economy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  42. GRAIN. 2005. Africa’s seed laws: red carpet for the corporations [Online]. Available from: https://www.grain.org/article/entries/540-africa-s-seeds-laws-red-carpet-for-corporations [Accessed 11th November 2014].
  43. Grey, S. and Patel, R. 2015. Food sovereignty as decolonisation: some contributions from indigenous movements to food systems and development politics. Agriculture and Human Values (32) pp. 431–444.Google Scholar
  44. Harrison, G. 2010. Neoliberal Africa: The impact of global social engineering. London Zed Books.Google Scholar
  45. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hassan, G. 2005. Biopiracy and GMOs: the fate of Iraq’s agriculture [Online]. Available from: http://www.globalresearch.ca/biopiracy-and-gmos-the-fate-of-iraq-s-agriculture/1447 [Accessed 12th March 2013].
  47. Hay, C. and Marsh, D. 2000. Demystifying globalization. London and New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2007. Globalisation/anti-globalisation: beyond the great divide. 2nd ed, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hettne, B. 2009. Thinking about development—development matters. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  50. Holt Gimenez, E. and Shattuck, A. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (1), pp. 109–144.Google Scholar
  51. IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a crossroads: a synthesis of the global and sub-global IAASTD reports. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  52. IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report, contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Online]. Available from: http://ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf. [Accessed 30th March 2017].
  53. Jarosz, L. 2014. Comparing food security and food sovereignty discourses. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2) pp. 168–181.Google Scholar
  54. Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), pp. 561–581.Google Scholar
  55. Kloppenburg, J. 2008. Seeds, sovereignty, and the Via Campesina. Plants, Property, and the Promise of Open Source Biology [Online]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255583305_Seeds_Sovereignty_and_the_Via_Campesina_Plants_Property_and_the_Promise_of_Open_Source_Biology [Accessed 10th April 2017].
  56. Kloppenburg, J. 2010. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), pp. 367–388.Google Scholar
  57. Kloppenburg, J., 2014. Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), pp. 1225–1246.Google Scholar
  58. Korab-Karpowicz, W.J. 2010. Political realism in international relations. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Online]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/. [Accessed 28th April 2014]
  59. Kumashiro, K. 2012. When billionaires become educational experts. Academe, 99(3), pp. 10–16.Google Scholar
  60. Lahiff, E. 2007. Willing buyer, willing seller: South Africa’s failed experiment in market-led agrarian reform. Third World Quarterly, 28(8), pp. 1577–1597.Google Scholar
  61. Lahiff, E., Borras, S M, and Kay C. 2007. Market-Led Agrarian Reform: Policies, Performance and Prospects. Third World Quarterly, 28 (8), pp. 1417–1436.Google Scholar
  62. Lamy, S.L. 2011. Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–129.Google Scholar
  63. Langyintuo, A. 2011. African agriculture and productivity. Nairobi, Kenya: Alliance for a Green Revolution.Google Scholar
  64. La Via Campesina (LVC). 1996. The right to produce and access to land [Online]. Available from: http://www.acordinternational.org/silo/files/decfoodsov1996.pdf [Accessed 22nd December 2018].
  65. La Via Campesina (LVC). 2008. Declaration of Maputo. IN: V International Conference of LVC, October 19–22 [Online]. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/our-conferences-mainmenu-28/5-maputo-2008-mainmenu-68/declarations-mainmenu-70/602-open-letter-from-maputo-v-international-conference-of-la-vcampesina [Accessed 22nd June 2015].
  66. Louwaars, N.P., De Boef, W.S. and Edeme, J. 2013. Integrated seed sector development in Africa: A basis for seed policy and law. Journal of Crop Improvement. 27, pp. 186–214.Google Scholar
  67. LVC. 2001. The position of Vía Campesina on biodiversity, biosafety and genetic resources. Development, 44(4), 47–51.Google Scholar
  68. Maathai, W. 2010. The challenge for Africa. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
  69. Magdoff, F. and Tokar, B. 2010. Agriculture and food in crisis; conflict, resistance, and renewal. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  70. McCann, J.C. 2011. The political ecology of cereal seed development in Africa: a history of selection. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 24–35.Google Scholar
  71. McGuire, S. and Sperling, L. 2011. The links between food security and seed security: facts and fiction that guide response. Development in Practice. 21(4–5), pp. 493–508.Google Scholar
  72. McKeon, N. 2015. Food security governance; empowering communities, regulating corporations. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  73. McMichael, P. and Schneider, M. 2011. Food security politics and the millennium development goals. Third World Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
  74. Minde, I. 2004. Harmonizing seed policies and regulations in Eastern Africa: experiences and lessons learned. Entebbe, Uganda: Eastern and Central African Programme for Agricultural Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  75. Mooney, P. 1979. Seeds of the earth: a private or public resource. Inter Pares for the Canadian Council for International Co-operation and The International Coalition for Development Action.Google Scholar
  76. Mooney, P. 1983. The law of the seed—another development and plant genetic resources. Development Dialogue, 1(2).Google Scholar
  77. Munyi, P. 2015. Plant variety protection regime in relation to relevant international obligations: implications for smallholder farmers in Kenya. The Journal of Intellectual Property, 18(1–2), pp. 65–85.Google Scholar
  78. Munyi, P. and De Jonge, B. 2015. Seed systems support in Kenya: consideration for an integrated seed sector development approach. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), pp. 161.Google Scholar
  79. Munyi, P., De Jonge, B. and Visser, B. 2016. Opportunities and threats to harmonisation of plant breeders’ rights in Africa: ARIPO and SADC. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 24(1), pp. 86–104.Google Scholar
  80. Murphy, S. 2013. Land grabs and fragile food systems—the role of globalisation. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.Google Scholar
  81. Murphy, S. 2014. Expanding the possibilities for a future free of hunger. Dialogues in Human Geography [Online], 4(2), pp. 225–228. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2043820614537166 [Accessed 26th September 2014].Google Scholar
  82. Nabhan, G. 1997. Cultures of habitat. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  83. New Internationalist. 2010. Seeds—the facts. New Internationalist, 435, pp. 10.Google Scholar
  84. Oakland Institute. 2017. Down on the seed: The World Bank enables corporate takeover of seeds. California, USA: Oakland Institute.Google Scholar
  85. Odame, H. and Muange, E. 2011. Can agro-dealers deliver the green revolution in Kenya? IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 78–89.Google Scholar
  86. Ohmae, K. 1995. The end of the nation state: the rise of regional economies. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  87. Patel, R. 2007. Stuffed and starved. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
  88. Patel, R. 2009. What does food sovereignty look like? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), pp. 663–706.Google Scholar
  89. Remington, T., Maroko, J., Walsh, S., Omanga, P. and Charles, E. 2002. Getting off the seeds-and-tools treadmill with CRS seed vouchers and fairs. Disasters, 26(4), pp. 316–328.Google Scholar
  90. Robin, M. 2010. The world according to Monsanto: pollution, corruption, and the control of our food supply. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  91. Rosset, P. 2003. Food sovereignty: global rallying cry of farmer movements. Institute for Food and Development Policy Backgrounder, 9(4), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  92. Scholte, J.A. 2008. Defining globalisation. The World Economy, 31(11), pp. 1471–1502.Google Scholar
  93. Scoones, I. and Thompson, J. 2011. The politics of seed in Africa’s green revolution. alternative narratives and competing pathways. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  94. Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and famines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Shaw D. J. 2007. World Food Security: A History Since 1945. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  96. Shiva, V. 1993. Monocultures of the mind: perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. London and New Jersey: Zed BooksGoogle Scholar
  97. Shiva, V. 2005. India divided: diversity and democracy under attack. New York: An Open Media Book, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  98. Shiva, V. 2013. The law of the seed. [Online]. Available from: www.navdanya.org/attachments/Latest_Publications4.pdf [Accessed 2nd April 2015].
  99. Sklair, L. 2002. Globalisation, capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Sperling, L. 2008. When disaster strikes: a guide for assessing seed security. Cali: CIAT.Google Scholar
  101. Stiglitz, J. 2005. The overselling of globalisation. IN Weinstein, M.M. (ed.), Globalisation: what’s new. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 228–262.Google Scholar
  102. Strange, S. 1996. The retreat of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Tansey, G. 2011. Whose power to control? Some reflections on seed systems and food security in a changing world. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 111–120.Google Scholar
  104. The Guardian. 2014. G8 New Alliance condemned as a new wave of colonialism in Africa. The Guardian [Online], 18th February. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/feb/18/g8-new-alliance-condemned-new-colonialism [Accessed 14/8/2014].
  105. Thompson, C.B. 2014. Philanthrocapitalism: appropriation of Africa’s genetic wealth. Review of African Political Economy, 41(141), pp. 389–405.Google Scholar
  106. UN. 2000. We the peoples. The role of the United Nations in the 21st century. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  107. UNDP-UNDAF. 2011. Ethiopia United Nations Development Assistance Framework 2012–2015. United Nations Country Team, March 2011.Google Scholar
  108. USAID. 1995. Food aid for food security, policy paper. Washington, DC: Bureau for Programme and Policy Coordination, USAID.Google Scholar
  109. USAID. 2012. Ethiopia country development cooperation strategy 2011–2015: accelerating the transformation toward prosperity [Online]. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1860/Country%20Development%20Cooperation%20Strategy%20-%20Ethiopia%20March%202012.pdf. [Accessed 12th January 2014].
  110. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2008. Kenya planting seed report. GAIN Report number: KE8010.Google Scholar
  111. Visser, O., Mamonova, N., Spoor, M. and Nikulin, A. 2015. ‘Quiet food sovereignty’ as food sovereignty without a movement? Insights from post-socialist Russia. Globalizations, 12(4), pp. 513–528.Google Scholar
  112. Windfuhr, M. and Jansen, J. 2005. Food sovereignty: towards democracy in localised food systems. Rugby, Warwickshire: FIAN ITDG Publishing.Google Scholar
  113. World Bank. 1986. Poverty and hunger. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  114. World Bank. 2008. World Bank Development Report: Agriculture for Development. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  115. World Bank. 2013a. World Bank Group Agriculture Action Plan 2013–1015 [Online]. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/1749873:bank-group-agriculture-action-plan-2013-2015. [Accessed 22nd June 2015].
  116. World Bank. 2013b. World development report. Risk and opportunity: managing risk for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law and GovernmentDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations