Advertisement

Understanding Sovereignty in a Globalised World

  • Clare O’Grady WalsheEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the International Relations literature on globalisation and sovereignty. Using a revised version of Held and McGrew’s framework for understanding the politics of globalisation, it identifies three approaches to understanding the ways in which globalisation has affected state sovereignty: (1) Hyperglobalists, who primarily regard globalisation as a distinct ‘new’ phenomenon, which is having considerable effect, particularly on state sovereignty, with a significantly increased role for international organisations and transnational actors in key policy arenas. (2) Sceptics, who regard globalisation as not ‘new’, arguing that the state and state sovereignty remain central despite globalising forces. (3) Transformationalists, who take a middle view arguing that there are varying effects of globalisation on states exercising policy sovereignty.

Keywords

Globalisation Sovereignty Hyperglobalism Scepticism Transformationalism 

References

  1. Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. 2011. The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, T. 1999. The great work, our way into the future. New York: Bell Tower.Google Scholar
  3. Carmody, P. 2011. The new scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society and culture. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Cerny, P. 2009. Multi-nodal politics: globalisation is what actors make of it. Review of International Studies, 35(2) pp. 421–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheru, F. 2002. African renaissance: roadmaps to the challenge of globalisation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. 2008. Anti-democratic nature of US capitalism is being exposed. The Irish Times [Online], 10th October. Available from: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/anti-democratic-nature-of-us-capitalism-is-being-exposed-1.894183 [Accessed 13th October 2012].
  8. Clark, I. 2011. Globalization and the post-cold war order. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 544–558.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, B.J. 2007. Global monetary governance. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Schutter, O. 2009. Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation report of the Special Rapporteur. A/64/170 United Nations General Assembly [Online]. Available from: http://farmersrights.org/pdf/righttofood-n0942473.pdf [Accessed 23rd February 2013].
  11. Downes, G. 2003. Implications of TRIPS for food security in the majority world [Online]. Available from: http://comhlamh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Implications-of-Trips-for-Food-Security.pdf [Accessed 10th April 2017].
  12. Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B.C. 2011. Realism. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–99.Google Scholar
  13. Eriksen, T.H. 2007. Globalisation: the key concepts. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. ETC (Erosion, Technology and Concentration Group). 2009. Who will feed us? Questions for the food and climate crises [Online]. Available from: http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/web_who_will_feed_us_with_notes_0.pdf [Accessed 1st February 2012].
  15. Evans, P. 2008. Is an alternative globalisation possible? Politics and Society, 36(271), pp. 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. George, S. 2015. Shadow sovereigns—how global corporations are seizing power. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. 1994. Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Gill, S. 2003. Power and resistance in the new world order. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Gilpin, R. 2001. Global political economy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  22. Haass, R.N. 2005. Sovereignty, Foreign Policy, no. 150, pp. 54–55.Google Scholar
  23. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2001. What the protestors in Genoa want. New York Times, 20th July 2001 [Online]. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2001/07/20/opinion/what-the-protesters-in-genoa-want.html. [Accessed 2nd December 2016].
  25. Harrison, G. 2010. Neoliberal Africa: The impact of global social engineering. London Zed Books.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. 1989. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hay, C. and Marsh, D. 2000. Demystifying globalization. London and New York: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heidegger, M. 1971. “The thing” in poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  31. Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2007. Globalisation/anti-globalisation: beyond the great divide. 2nd edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hettne, B. 2009. Thinking about development—development matters. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 2002. The future of globalisation—cooperation and conflict. Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 37(3), pp. 247–265.Google Scholar
  35. Irish Times. 2010. Was it for this? (Editorial). The Irish Times [Online]. Available from: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/was-it-for-this-1.678424. 18th November 2010. [Accessed 17th October 2015].
  36. James, J. and Versteeg. 2007. Mobile phones in Africa: how much do we really know? Social Indicator Research, 84, pp. 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), pp. 561–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keohane, R. 2001. Governance in a partially globalised world: presidential address. American Political Science Association 2000. American Political Science Review, 95(1), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  39. Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J. 1977. Power and interdependence. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  40. King, R. and Kendall, G. 2004. The state, democracy and globalisation. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Krasner, S.D. 2001. Sovereignty. Foreign Policy, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar
  42. Krasner, S.D. 2005. The case for shared sovereignty. Journal of Democracy, 16(1), pp. 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lamy, S.L. 2011. Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–129.Google Scholar
  44. Maathai, W. 2010. The challenge for Africa. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
  45. Martell, L. 2007. The third wave in globalisation theory. International Studies Review, 9(2), pp. 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McGrew, A. 2011. Globalisation and global politics. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–33.Google Scholar
  47. McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media. Toronto: Signet Books.Google Scholar
  48. McMichael, P. and Schneider, M. 2011. Food security politics and the millennium development goals. Third World Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, S. 2013. Land grabs and fragile food systems—the role of globalisation. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.Google Scholar
  50. The Irish Times. 2013. Interview with Pascal Lamy, World Trade Organisation. The Irish Times: Business, 19th April 2013, p. 5.Google Scholar
  51. Ohmae, K. 1995. The end of the nation state: the rise of regional economies. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Patel, R. 2007. Stuffed and starved. London: Portobello Books.Google Scholar
  53. Rafael, S. and Stokes, D. 2011. Globalising West African oil: US ‘Energy security’ and the global economy. International Affairs, 87(4), pp. 903–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rangnekar, D. 2014. Geneva rhetoric, national reality: the political economy of introducing plant breeders’ rights in Kenya. New Political Economy, 19(3), pp. 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robin, M. 2010. The world according to Monsanto: pollution, corruption, and the control of our food supply. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenau, J.N. 2000. The governance of fragmegration: neither a world republic nor a global interstate system (A Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Congress of the International Political Science Association, Quebec City, August 1–5, 2000). The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenau, J.N. 2003. Distant proximities: dynamics beyond globalisation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenberg, J. 2000. The follies of globalisation theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  59. Rosenberg, J. 2005. Globalisation theory: a post-mortem. International Politics, 42(1), pp. 2–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sassen, S. 2011. The global street: making the political. Globalisations, 8(5), pp. 573–579.Google Scholar
  61. Scholte, J.A. 2008. Defining globalisation. The World Economy, 31(11), pp. 1471–1502.Google Scholar
  62. Shiva, V. 2001. Protect or plunder. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  63. Sklair, L. 2002. Globalisation, capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Slaughter, A.M. 1997. The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), pp. 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Slaughter, A.M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sorensen, G. 2004. The transformation of the state: beyond the myth of retreat. Palgrave: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Stevens, T. 2013. Sovereign data in international relations [Online]. Available from: http://thesigers.com/analysis/2013/11/11/sovereign-data-in-international-relations.html [Accessed 24th June 2015].
  68. Stiglitz, J. 2005. The overselling of globalisation. IN Weinstein, M.M. (ed.), Globalisation: what’s new. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 228–262.Google Scholar
  69. Strange, S. 1996. The retreat of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tansey, G. 2011. Whose power to control? Some reflections on seed systems and food security in a changing world. IDS Bulletin, 42(4), pp. 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tucker, V. ed. 1997. Cultural perspectives on development, European Journal of Development Research 8(2), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  72. UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report. Geneva: UN Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
  73. Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  74. Wang, G. 2004. The impact of globalisation on state sovereignty. Chinese Journal of International Law, 3(2), pp. 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Willetts, P. 2011. Transnational actors and international organizations in global politics. IN: Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds.) The globalization of world politics, an introduction to international relations. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–345.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law and GovernmentDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations