Advertisement

Data Modeling and Visualization of Tax Strategies Employed by Overseas American Individuals and Firms

  • Alfred Howard MillerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 29)

Abstract

A study of the tax behavior of overseas American individuals and small firms, where the researcher models behavior, through text analysis, using data mining technologies of KH Coder, with data collected from a wide range of sources using interviews, surveys, blog and forum postings, published reports as well as personal communications, to demonstrate and inform using the pattern matching method. Text mining and modeling techniques, using unsupervised machine learning facilitate large-scale analysis of behavioral approaches to taxation to motivate a better understanding of the phenomenon tax avoidance and tax evasion. There are an estimated 9 million taxable overseas Americans corporations and business entities and estimated that as many as 100 billion U.S. dollars may go uncollected, due to tax evasion. A similar shortfall of 100 billion dollars is due to tax avoidance. The researcher proposes a model explaining tax avoidance behavior by the US taxable entities.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Higher Colleges of Technology, Fujairah Colleges, of Fujairah UAE, where the principle investigator is employed as an applied researcher.

References

  1. 1.
    Trochim, W.M.: Outcome program matching and pattern theory. Eval. Program Plan. 12, 355–366 (1989). https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/research/Outcome%20Pattern%20Matching%20and%20Program%20Theory.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trochim, W.M.: Hindsight is 20/20: reflections on the evolution of concept mapping. Eval. Program Plan. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gravelle, J.G.: Tax havens: international tax avoidance and evasion. Congr. Res. Serv. (2015). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40623.pdf
  4. 4.
    CA by the Numbers: Counsular Affairs by the Numbers. US Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs (2017). https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/travel/CA_By_the_Numbers.pdf
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Marshall, S.: Corporate inversion and the impact on the United States. Business, Lagrange.edu. (2016). http://www.lagrange.edu/resources/pdf/citations/2016/11_Marshall_Business.pdf
  7. 7.
    degl’Innocenti, D.G., Rablen, M.: Income tax avoidance and evasion: a narrow bracketing approach. Public Financ. Rev. 45(6) (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116676362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K@W: Corporate tax avoidance: can the system be fixed? Knowledge at Wharton (2013). http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/corporate-tax-avoidance-can-the-system-be-fixed/#comments
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Gupta, S., Mills, L.F., Towery, E.M.: The effect of mandatory financial disclosures of tax uncertainty on tax reporting and collection: the case of fin 48 and multistate tax avoidance. J. Am. Tax. Assoc. 36(2), 231–239 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-10402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bui, Q., Sanger-Katz, M.: Hacking the tax plan: ways to profit off the republican tax bill. The Upshot, The New York Times (2017). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/12/upshot/tax-hacks.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2017
  12. 12.
    Tax Foundation: State-local tax burden rankings FY 2012 (2017). https://taxfoundation.org/publications/state-local-tax-burden-rankings/. Accessed Dec 30 2017
  13. 13.
    Miller, A.H.: Computer-aided content analysis of the corpus of business discourse: a comparison of accounting and HR learners, NETs 2016, Osaka, Japan, 25 July 2015 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller, A.H.: Preparing students for career success in accounting: the SCIL-based model with a focus on content analysis. Transnatl. J. Bus. (2017). http://www.acbsp.org/members/group.aspx?id=143359
  15. 15.
    Miller, A.H.: A corpus-based computer aided linguistic analysis of taxation learning outcomes. In: International Conference on Business, Big-Data, and Decision Sciences (2017 ICBBD), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2–4 August 2017. http://icbbd2017.globalconf.org/site/page.aspx?pid=901&sid=1128&lang=en
  16. 16.
    Miller, A.H.: Modeling taxation learning outcomes using unsupervised machine learning. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7(2.4), 109–116 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.13019. https://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijet/article/view/13019/5200. Accessed 15 Aug 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunston, S.: Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vesanto, J., Alhoniemi, E.: Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(3) (2000). http://ftp.it.murdoch.edu.au/units/ICT219/Papers%20for%20transfer/papers%20on%20Clustering/Clustering%20SOM.pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berinato, S.: Visualizations that really work. Harv. Bus. Rev., June 2016. https://hbr.org/2016/06/visualizations-that-really-work. Accessed 2 Sept 2016
  20. 20.
    Buja, A., Swayne, D.F., Littman, M.L., Dean, N., Hofman, H., Chen, L.: Data visualization with multidimensional scaling. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 17(2), 444–472 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1198/106186008X318440MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tamura, T.: Application of text-mining methodology to sociological analysis of internet text in Japan, Japan and the internet: perspectives and practices (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mori, J., Matsuo, Y., Ishizuka, M., Faltings, B.: Keyword extraction from the web for FOAF metadata. In: Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the Semantic Web, Galway, Ireland. Google Scholar (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Minami, A., Ohura, Y.: How student’s attitude influences on learning achievement? An analysis of attitude representing words appearing in looking-back evaluation. In: ICIT Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, pp. 164–169 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, C.H., Jannasch-Pennell, A., DiGangi, S.: Compatibility between text mining and qualitative research in the perspectives of grounded theory, content analysis, and reliability (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Posner, R.: Opinion, United States of America, PlaintiffAppellee, v. Deanna L. Costello, Defendant-Appellant, No. 11-291 U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit Court (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith, G.: Data and intuition. The Conglomerate (2014). http://www.theconglomerate.org/corpuslinguistics/
  27. 27.
    O’Neil, C.: ‘Rogue Algorithms’ and the dark side of big data. Knowledge@Wharton. Wharton, University of Pennsylvania (2016). http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/roguealgorithms-dark-side-big-data/?utm_source=kw_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campain=2016-09-22
  28. 28.
    Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Lang, A.G.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 1149–1160 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teixeira, D.P.: Attitudes on the ethics of tax evasion: a survey of banking employees (Master thesis), Lisbon school of economics and management (2016). https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/aquila/getFile.do?fileId=868711&method=getFile
  30. 30.
    Alm, J.: Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. Int. Tax Public Financ. 19(1), 54–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tenidoua, E., Valsamidisa, S., Petasakisa, I., Mandilasa, A.: Elenxis, an effective tool for the war against tax avoidance and evasion. Procedia Econ. Financ. 33, 303–312 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01714-1. 7th International Conference, The Economies of Balkan and Eastern Europe Countries in the changed world, EBEEC 2015, 8–10 May 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nie, L., Wang, M., Gao, Y., Zha, Z.J., Chua, T.S.: Beyond text QA: multimedia answer generation by harvesting web information. Trans. Multimed. 15(2), 426–441 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2012.2229971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harvey, L: Beyond member-checking: a dialogic approach to the research interview. Int. J. Res. Method Educ., 1–16 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fujairah Women’s College, Higher Colleges of TechnologyFujairahUAE

Personalised recommendations