Self-excited Vibrations of a Bridge Deck with Single and Double Wind Barriers

  • A. BuljacEmail author
  • H. Kozmar
  • M. Macháček
  • S. Pospíšil
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)


Wind-tunnel experiments were carried out to study the influence of wind barriers on the flutter susceptibility of a bridge-deck section. This was performed on the model of a streamlined bridge-deck section equipped with various wind barriers. The wind barriers of various heights and constant porosity of 30% were placed at the (a) windward bridge-deck edge, (b) leeward bridge-deck edge, (c) both windward and leeward bridge-deck edges. The results indicate that the studied bridge deck remains dynamically stable with respect to the heave motion for all configurations of wind barriers. The configurations with wind barriers at both edges are more sensitive to torsional flutter when compared to configurations with single wind barriers placed either at the windward or at the leeward bridge-deck edge.


Bridge deck Self-excited vibrations Flutter derivatives Wind-tunnel experiments 



The activity presented in the paper is part of the research grant No. 17-26353 J by the Czech science foundation (GAČR).


  1. Avila-Sanchez S, Lopez-Garcia O, Cuerva A, Meseguer J (2016) Characterisation of cross-flow above a railway bridge equipped with solid windbreaks. Eng Struct 126:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buljac A, Kozmar H, Pospíšil S, Macháček M (2017) Aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of typical bridge decks equipped with wind barriers at the windward bridge-deck edge. Eng Struct 137:310–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu CR, Chang CY, Huang CJ, Wu TR, Wang CY, Liu MY (2013) Windbreak protection for road vehicles against crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 116:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehsan F, Scanlan RH (1990) Vortex-induced vibrations of flexible bridges. J Eng Mech 116:1392–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. He X, Shi K, Wu T, Zou Y, Wang H, Qin H (2016) Aerodynamic performance of a novel wind barrier for train-bridge system. Wind Struct 23:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones NP, Scanlan RH, Sarkar PP, Singh L (1995) The effect of section model details on aeroelastic parameters. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 54(55):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kozmar H, Procino L, Borsani A, Bartoli G (2012) Sheltering efficiency of wind barriers on bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 107(108):274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Král R, Pospíšil P, Náprstek J (2014) Wind tunnel experiments on unstable self-excited vibration of sectional girders. J Fluids Struct 44:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Král R, Pospíšil S, Náprstek J (2016) Experimental set-up for advanced aeroelastic tests on sectional models. Exp Tech 40:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scanlan RH, Tomko JJ (1971) Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 97:1717–1733Google Scholar
  11. Simiu E, Scanlan RH (1996) Wind effects on structures: fundamentals and applications to design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Xu YL (2013) Wind effects on cable-supported bridges. Wiley, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Xu F, Zhu L, Ge X, Zhang Z (2014) Some new insights into the identification of bridge deck flutter derivatives. Eng Struct 75:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Buljac
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. Kozmar
    • 1
  • M. Macháček
    • 2
  • S. Pospíšil
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics PraguePragueCzechia

Personalised recommendations