Advertisement

Protection of the Marine Environment: The International and National Regulation of Deep Seabed Mining Activities

Chapter
First Online:
  • 1.1k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the international and national regulatory framework pertaining to deep seabed mining activities. It begins by discussing the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the backdrop for all marine activities – be they national or international – and examines the obligations of states to protect the marine environment from the harmful effects arising from deep seabed mining. Next, the chapter examines the international regime for deep seabed mining (i.e. “activities in the Area”), explaining the “common heritage of mankind” status of the Area (i.e. the international seabed); the functions of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the international organization established to govern deep seabed mining in the Area; and the concept of state sponsorship of non-state entities (i.e. private actors) for deep seabed mining in the Area. The chapter follows with a discussion of the development of national legislation to regulate deep seabed mining, examining efforts in the Pacific region where many prospective deep-sea mining sites are located. This includes a look at the legislative regimes of several Pacific Island nations, namely, Papua New Guinea, Tonga and the Cook Islands, for whom deep seabed mining may soon become a reality – as well as New Zealand and Japan, countries with comparatively developed rule of law and legislative regimes that have undertaken or considered deep seabed mining in their national waters. Overall, the chapter critically describes and evaluates the current regulatory status in the international and national seabed areas and highlights some salient gaps that require urgent attention in order to ensure marine environmental protection and mitigate impacts on humans.

Keywords

Deep-sea mining Marine environment National, international regulations 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Advisory Opinion Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area. (2011). ITLOS decision No 17.Google Scholar
  2. Anaya, J. (2005). Indigenous peoples’ participatory rights in relation to decisions about natural resource extraction: The more fundamental issue of what rights indigenous peoples have in lands and resources. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22(7), 16–17.Google Scholar
  3. Anaya, J. (2015). Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples on extractive industries and indigenous peoples. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 32(109), 118–120.Google Scholar
  4. Aguon J. & Hunter J. (2019). Second Wave Due Diligence: The Case for Incorporating Free, Prior, and Informed Consent into the Deep Sea Mining Regulatory Regime. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 38, 3–55.Google Scholar
  5. Basic Plan on Ocean Policy, March 2008, provisional translation. (2013). Accessible at: http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/kaiyou/kihonkeikaku/080318kihonkeikaku_E.pdf.
  6. Beder, S. (2006). Environmental principles and policies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  7. Blue Ocean Law & Pacific Network on Globalisation. (2016). Resource roulette: How deep sea mining and inadequate regulatory frameworks imperil the Pacific and its peoples. Accessible at: http://nabf219anw2q7dgn1rt14bu4.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2016/06/Resource_Roulette-1.pdf.
  8. Boschen, R. E., et al. (2013). Mining of deep-sea seafloor massive sulfides: A review of the deposits, their benthic communities, impacts from mining, regulatory frameworks and management strategies. Ocean and Coastal Management, 84(54), 62.Google Scholar
  9. Boyle, A., & Chinkin, C. (2007). The making of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, C. (2018). Mining at 2,500 fathoms under the sea: Thoughts on an emerging regulatory framework. Ocean Science Journal, 53(2), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chircop, A. (2011). Managing adjacency: Some legal aspects of the relationship between the extended continental shelf and the international seabed area. Ocean Development and International Law, 42(4), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christiansen, S., Ginzky, H., Singh, P., Thiele, T. (2018). The international seabed – the common heritage of mankind: Recommendations for future governance by the International Seabed Authority, IASS Policy Brief, 2018, 2.  https://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2018.012.
  13. Churchill, R., & Lowe, V. (1999). The law of the sea (3rd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Commentary. (2011). Exclusive economic zone and continental shelf (environmental effects) bill: Government bill 321—2, As reported from the Local Government and Environment Committee, New Zealand Legislation. Accessible at: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2011/0321/23.0/whole.html.
  15. Cook Islands Seabed Minerals Authority. (2018). Frequently asked questions. Accessible at: https://www.seabedmineralsauthority.gov.ck/faqs.
  16. Crown Minerals Act. (1991). New Zealand legislation. Accessible at; http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2011/0321/23.0/versions.aspx.
  17. Decision on Marine Consent Application Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited: To mine phosphorite nodules on the Chatham Rise. (2015). Environmental protection authority. New Zealand Government. Accessible at: https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Marine-Activities-EEZ/Activities/CRP-Decision-EEZ000006.pdf.
  18. Draft Documents. (2019). Seabed Minerals Authority, Cook Islands. Accessible at: https://www.seabedmineralsauthority.gov.ck/seabed-minerals/documents_idl=10003_idt=514_id=2730_.html.
  19. Egede, E. (2018). The area: Common heritage of mankind, sponsoring states of convenience and developing states. In M. Kotzur, N. Matz-Lück, A. Proelss, R. Verheyen, & J. Sanden (Eds.), Sustainable ocean resource governance: Deep seabed mining, marine energy and submarine cables. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Environment Act. (2000). No 64. Independent state of Papua New Guinea. Accessible at: http://www.mra.gov.pg/Portals/2/Publications/Enironment%20Act%202000.PDF.
  21. Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act. (2012). New Zealand legislation, reprint June 2017. Accessible at: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2011/0321/23.0/whole.html.
  22. Franckx, E. (2010). The International Seabed Authority and the common heritage of mankind: The need for states to establish the outer limits of their continental shelf. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 25(4), 543–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geddis, E. (2017). The due diligence obligation of a sponsoring state: A framework for implementation. In M. H. Nordquist, J. N. Moore, & R. Long (Eds.), International marine economy: Law and policy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  24. Halpern, B. S., Frazier, M., Potapenko, J., Casey, K. S., Koenig, K., Longo, C., Lowndes, J. S., Rockwood, R. C., Selig, E. R., Selkoe, K. A., & Walbridge, S. (2015). Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nature Communications, 6, 7615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, J. (2011). Making the law of the sea: A study in the development of international law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, J. (2017). Saving the oceans through law: The international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hartley, S. (2018). Chatham has plans for new mining consent. Otago Daily Times. Accessible at: https://www.odt.co.nz/business/chatham-has-plans-new-mining-consent.
  28. Howard, R. (2018). Environmentalists plan ironsands cross-appeal. Newsroom. Accessible at: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/10/05/265886/environmentalists-plan-ironsands-cross-appeal.
  29. Hunter, J., Singh, P., & Aguon, J. (2018). Broadening common heritage: Addressing gaps in the deep sea mining regulatory regime. Harvard Environmental Law Review (online), 16 April 2018. Accessible at: http://harvardelr.com/2018/04/16/broadening-common-heritage/.
  30. ISA National Legislation Database. Accessible at: https://www.isa.org.jm/national-legislation-database.
  31. Jaeckel, A. (2017). The International Seabed Authority and the precautionary principle: Balancing deep seabed mineral mining and marine environmental protection. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K. M., & Ardron, J. (2017). Conserving the common heritage of humankind – Options for the deep-seabed mining regime. Marine Policy, 78, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jin, J., & Zhang, G. (2017). The forthcoming breakthrough: China’s legislation on activities in the deep seabed area. In M. H. Nordquist, J. N. Moore, & R. Long (Eds.), International marine economy: Law and policy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  34. Kaye, S. (2016). A zonal approach to maritime regulation and enforcement. In R. Warner & S. Kaye (Eds.), Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Kielland, N. (2015). Supporting aboriginal participation in resource development: The role of impact and benefit agreements. Ottawa: Library of Parliament.Google Scholar
  36. Kikkawa, T. (2013). Why has Japan revised the mining act? Historical and contemporary background. Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce & Management, 47, 33–42.Google Scholar
  37. Lamping, S. (2016). Seabed mining: Managing the future of mineral exploitation. Environmental Protection Authority. Accessible at: https://www.planning.org.nz/Attachment?Action=Download&Attachment_id=3780.
  38. Law on Interim Measures for Deep Seabed Mining. (1982). Government of Japan. Accessible at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20692545?read-now=1&loggedin=true&seq=19#page_scan_tab_contents.
  39. Levin, L., et al. (2016). Hydrothermal vents and methane seeps: Rethinking the sphere of influence. Frontiers Marine Policy, 3(72), 1–23.Google Scholar
  40. Lodge, M. (2012). The common heritage of mankind. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 27(4), 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lodge, M., Johnson, D., Gurun, G. L., Wengler, M., Weaver, P., & Gunn, V. (2014). Seabed mining: International Seabed Authority environmental management plan for the Clarion–Clipperton zone: A partnership approach. Marine Policy, 49, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lodge, M., Segerson, K., & Squires, D. (2017). Sharing and preserving the resources in the deep sea: Challenges for the International Seabed Authority. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 32(3), 427–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marae Moana Act. (2017). Cook Islands. Accessible at: http://www.paclii.org/ck/legis/num_act/mma201793.pdf.
  44. Markus, T., & Singh, P. (2016). Promoting consistency in the deep seabed: Addressing regulatory dimensions in designing the International Seabed Authority’s exploitation code. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 25, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. May, R. (2017). Papua New Guinea in 2016: Growing civil frustration. Asian Survey, 57, 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonald, B. (2017). Japan just mined the ocean floor and people want answers. CBC radios. Accessible at: http://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/october-14-2017-1.4353185/japan-just-mined-the-ocean-floor-and-people-want-answers-1.4353198.
  47. Miller, K. A., Thompson, K. F., Johnston, P., & Santillo, D. (2018). An overview of seabed mining including the current state of development, environmental impacts, and knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mining Act 1992 Regulation, No. 20. Government of Papua New Guinea. Accessible at: http://www.mra.gov.pg/Portals/2/Publications/MINING_ACT%201992.pdf.
  49. Mining Act, Act No. 289 of December 20, 1950. Government of Japan. Accessible at http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=29&vm=2&re=.
  50. New Zealand Herald. (2018). Seabed mining appeal wraps up in Wellington. Accessible at: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12036414.
  51. Nielsen, S. H. H., et al. (2015). Chatham Rise nodular phosphate — modelling the prospectivity of a lag deposit (off-shore New Zealand): A critical tool for use in resource development and deep sea mining. Oregon Geological Reviews, 71, 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pulu, T. B. (2013). The kingdom of Tonga and deep sea minerals. Te Kaharoa, 6, 50–76.Google Scholar
  53. Roche, C. & Feenan, J. (2013). Drivers for the development of deep sea minerals in the Pacific. Mineral Policy Institute. Accessible at: http://www.mpi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Roche-and-Feenan-2013-Drivers-for-the-Development-of-Deep-Sea-Minerals-in-the-Pacific.pdf.
  54. Rothwell, D., & Stephens, T. (2016). The international law of the sea (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Seabed Minerals Act. 2009. Cook Islands. Accessible at: https://www.seabedmineralsauthority.gov.ck/laws-and-regulations.
  57. Seabed Minerals Act 2014, Act 10. Tonga. Accessible at: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/ton143350.pdf.
  58. Sun, L. (2018). International environmental obligations and liabilities in deep seabed mining (dissertation Leiden). Amsterdam: Ipskamp Printing.Google Scholar
  59. Szablowski, D. (2011). Operationalizing free, prior, and informed consent in the extractive industry sector? Examining the challenges of a negotiated model of justice. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 30, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh, P., & Jaeckel, A. (2018). Future prospects of marine environmental governance. In: M. Salomon & T. Markus (eds.). Handbook on marine environment protection. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  61. Takaya, Y., et al. (2018). The tremendous potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth elements. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tanaka, Y. (2015). The international law of the sea (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tatsuya, N. (2017). Japanese legal system related to DSM. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, presentation accessible at: http://www.cosie-sip.ynu.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/SIP_IntSympo171107_2.2_Nakada.pdf.Google Scholar
  64. UNDP. (2014). National human development report, Papua New Guinea, from wealth to wellbeing: Translating resource revenue into sustainable human development. Accessible at: http://www.pg.undp.org/content/dam/papua_new_ guinea/docs/Publications/FINAL%20PNG%20NHDR_low%20res.compressed.pdf.
  65. Van Dover, C. L., Ardron, J. A., Escobar, E., Gianni, M., Gjerde, K. M., Jaeckel, A., Jones, D. O. B., Levin, L. A., Niner, H. J., Pendleton, L., Smith, C. R., Thiele, T., Turner, P. J., Watling, L., & Weaver, P. P. E. (2017). Biodiversity loss from deep-sea mining. Nature Geoscience, 10, 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verlaan, P. (2018). Deep seabed mining. In M. Solomon & T. Markus (Eds.), Handbook on marine environment protection: Science, impacts and sustainable management. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Wedding, L. M., Reiter, S. M., Smith, C. R., Gjerde, K. M., Kittinger, J. N., Friedlander, J. N., Gaines, S. D., Clark, M. R., Thurnherr, A. M., Hardy, S. M., & Crowder, L. B. (2015). Managing mining of the deep seabed. Science, 349(6244), 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Trade Organization. (2017). China – rare earths. Accessible at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/1pagesum_e/ds431sum_e.pdf. Brief biography and photos of authors.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of Bremen and Center for Marine Environmental Sciences (MARUM)BremenGermany
  2. 2.Blue Ocean LawHagåtñaGuam

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options