Advertisement

The Rise and Rise of Permitted Development in England

  • Ben CliffordEmail author
  • Jessica Ferm
  • Nicola Livingstone
  • Patricia Canelas
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter charts the rise of permitted development, explaining how successive governments have increased the amount and type of activity possible in England without planning permission as part of a broader series of planning reforms. The government’s aims for these reforms are considered. The chapter also introduces the book as a whole, explaining the extent of office-to-residential change of use seen since the deregulation was introduced in 2013, the need to consider the topic because of its direct impacts on the built environment and communities, but also the need to look at this more generally to understand how planning works (and is being undermined). The chapter concludes with an outline of the rest of the book to follow.

Keywords

Permitted development England Deregulation Change of use Conversion Coalition government 

References

  1. Bibby, P., Brindley, P., Dunning, R., Henneberry, J., McClean, A., & Tubridy, D. (2018). The Exercise of Permitted Development Rights in England Since 2010. RICS, London: Report to the RICS Research Trust.Google Scholar
  2. Blears, H. (2008). ‘Beauty vs. Brutality’: Speech to CABE. http://www.communities.gov.uk/speeches/corporate/beautyvsbrutality. Accessed 8 August 2008.
  3. Booth, P. (2003). Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, R. (1988). The Price of Private Planning: A Review of Urban Planning Policy in Scotland. In D. McCrone & A. Brown (Eds.), The Scottish Government Yearbook 1988 (pp. 183–199). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clifford, B. (2006). Only a Town Planner Would Run a Toxic-Waste Pipeline Through a Recreational Area: Planning and Planners in the British Press. Town Planning Review, 77(4), 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clifford, B., Ferm, J., Livingstone, N., & Canelas, P. (2018). Assessing the Impacts of Extending Permitted Development Rights to Office-to-Residential Change of Use in England. RICS, London: Report to the RICS Research Trust.Google Scholar
  7. DCLG. (2012). Relaxation of Planning Rules for Change of Use from Commercial to Residential: Summary of Consultation Responses and the Government’s Response to the Consultation. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.Google Scholar
  8. DCLG. (2013a). New Measures to Breathe Life into Empty Buildings and Boost Growth. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-measures-to-breathe-life-into-empty-buildings-and-boost-growth. Accessed 28 October 2017.
  9. DCLG. (2013b). Relaxation of Planning Rules for Change of Use from Offices to Residential: Impact Assessment. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207922/Relaxation_of_planning_rules_for_change_of_use_from_offices_to_residential_-_impact_assessment.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2017.
  10. DCLG. (2015). Thousands More Homes to Be Developed in Planning Shake Up. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/thousands-more-homes-to-be-developed-in-planning-shake-up. Accessed 28 October 2017.
  11. Gallent, N., Durrant, D., & Stirling, P. (2018). Between the Unimaginable and the Unthinkable: Pathways to and from England’s Housing Crisis. Town Planning Review, 89(2), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunder, M. (2016). Planning’s “Failure” to Ensure Efficient Market Delivery: A Lacanian Deconstruction of this Neoliberal Scapegoating Fantasy. European Planning Studies, 24(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HM Government (2015). Better Regulation Framework Manual: Practical Guidance for UK Government Officials. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.Google Scholar
  14. May, T. (2018). PM Speech on Making Housing Fairer: 5 March. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-making-housing-fairer-5-march. Accessed 29 August 2018.
  15. Parker, C. (2013). Twenty Years of Responsive Regulation: An Appreciation and Appraisal. Regulation & Governance, 7, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing States: Thin Policies/Hard Outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prior, A., & Raemaekers, J. (2006). Does Planning Deregulation Threaten the Environment? The Effect of ‘Permitted Development’ on the Natural Heritage of Scotland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(2), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, L. (2017a). Planning: Change of Use (Briefing Paper, No. 01301). London: House of Commons Library. Google Scholar
  19. Smith, L. (2017b). Permitted Development Rights (Briefing Paper, No. 00485). London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
  20. T’hart, & Boin. (2001). Between Crisis and Normalcy: The Long Shadow of Post-crisis Politics. In U. Rosenthal, A. Boin, & L. Comfort (Eds.), Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities (pp. 28–46). Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
  21. UK Parliament. (2013). Change of Use: Promoting Regeneration. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/change-of-use-promoting-regeneration. Accessed 28 October 2017.
  22. Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-Liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration. Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Clifford
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jessica Ferm
    • 2
  • Nicola Livingstone
    • 3
  • Patricia Canelas
    • 4
  1. 1.Bartlett School of PlanningUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Bartlett School of PlanningUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Bartlett School of PlanningUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Bartlett School of PlanningUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations