Advertisement

Meta-transformative Behaviors

  • M. Javad KhajaviEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on another transformative scenario in which the transformation is not necessarily the result of a change in the shape of calligraphic forms, but is rather the consequence of a shift in the function of calligraphy. This kind of transformative quality, which can be observed in many specimens of Islamic calligraphy and neo-calligraphy, is called meta-transformation. First, by providing examples from traditional Islamic calligraphy, it is explained how a specimen of calligraphy may transform into an image without a change in the identity of its calligraphic forms. This is followed by an inspection of cases in which the meaning of glyphs, letters, and words transforms and becomes loaded with metaphorical and symbolic meanings, effectively becoming much more than mere linguistic signs. It is argued that in both these cases it is in fact the function of calligraphy that transforms. This chapter then examines three major functions of calligraphic forms in calligraphic art: “aesthetic,” “semantic,” and “hermeneutic.” It is argued that in many calligraphic artworks there is a tension between these three (or at least two of these three) functions, and that these tensions can appear over time in time-based media. Furthermore, this chapter proposes a general category of temporal events that may lead to a shift in the function of calligraphy. In conclusion, issues of legibility and readability are revisited as one of the consequences of the shift in the function of calligraphy over time.

Keywords

Aesthetic Calligraphic art Function Hermeneutic Readability fluctuation Meta-transformative Semantic 

References

  1. Ali, W. (1997). Modern Islamic art: Development and continuity. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Barzegar, K. N. (2013). The Nuqtavi movement and the question of its exodus during the Safavid period (Sixteenth Century AD): A historical survey. Indian Historical Review, 40(1), 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendazzi, G. (2016). Animation: A world history (Vol. 3). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, S. S. (2006). Islamic calligraphy. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Beer, A. (2010). Kinesic constructions: An aesthetic analysis of movement and performance in 3D animation. Animation Studies Online Journal, 5, 44–52. Retrieved from https://journal.animationstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ASVol4Art5AdeBeer.pdf
  6. During, J., Mirabdolbaghi, Z., & Safvat, D. (1991). The art of Persian music. Washington, DC: Mage.Google Scholar
  7. Ekhtiar, M. (2006). Practice makes perfect: The art of calligraphy exercises (siyāh mashq) in Iran. Muqarnas, 23, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu’ād, H. (1992). Ramziyat al-alif ‘inda Ibn ‘Arabī [The symbolism of the letter alif in Ibn ‘Arabi]. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, 12, 145–177.  https://doi.org/10.2307/521646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grabar, O. (1992). The mediation of ornament. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hamedani, S. A. (2014). asrār al-nuqṭa [The secrets of the dot] (M. Khajavi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Mulā.Google Scholar
  11. Hashemi, S. G. (2010). Rīshi yābī taṣāvīr-i nivishtārī dar khushnivīsī Islami-Irani [Exploring the origins of pictorial writing in Iranian Islamic calligraphy]. Master’s thesis, Tehran Art University, Tehran.Google Scholar
  12. Khajavi, M. J. (2019). Animating with the primordial pen: Mystic and Sufi inspirations in calligraphic animation. In M. Yokota, T. G. Hu, & G. Horvath (Eds.), Animating the spirited: Journeys and transformations [“submitted for publication”]. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  13. Khatibi, A., & Sijelmassi, M. (1995). The splendour of Islamic calligraphy. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  14. Marks, L. U. (2010). Enfoldment and infinity: An Islamic genealogy of new media art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marks, L. U. (2011). Calligraphic animation: Documenting the invisible. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(3), 307–323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847711417930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marriott, B. (2007). The rebirth of hope in a time of upheaval: An analysis of early-modern millennial movements across the Abrahamic tradition. World History Bulletin, 23(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  17. Moustafa, A., & Sperl, S. (2014). The cosmic script: Sacred geometry and the science of Arabic penmanship (Vol. 1). London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  18. Railing, P. (2007). Ten poems from Hafez [Review of the book Ten Poems from Hafez, by J. Peacock]. The Art Book, 14(1), 24–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8357.2007.00757_6.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rumi: Swallowing the sun. (2007). (F. D. Lewis, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Safwat, N. F. (1996). The art of the pen: Calligraphy of the 14th to 20th centuries. London: Nour Foundation in association with Azimuth Editions and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schimmel, A. (1975). Mystical dimensions of Islam. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schimmel, A. (1990). Calligraphy and Islamic culture. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  23. Schimmel, A., & Rivolta, B. (1992). Islamic calligraphy. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, 50(1), 1–56.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3263914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shabout, N. M. (2007). Modern Arab art: Formation of Arab aesthetics. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  25. Teparić, M. (2013). Figural representation in the Arabic calligraphy. Epiphany: Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, 6(2), 145–161.Google Scholar
  26. Zettl, H. (2011). Sight sound motion: Applied media aesthetics (6th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Volda University CollegeVoldaNorway

Personalised recommendations