Implementing CPS in Educational Settings
There are specific concerns and challenges related to implementing Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) in schools. This chapter describes what CPS looks like as a primary, secondary, and tertiary intervention and outlines detailed considerations related to implementing CPS in educational settings. This chapter also introduces a CPS-consistent Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP).
KeywordsCollaborative Problem Solving School Education Children MTSS Evidence-based practice Behavior Student Discipline
In this video, Dr. J. Stuart Ablon, Director of Think:Kids, introduces an additional support for school-based implementation of Collaborative Problem Solving, a structured curriculum available to teachers, other school personnel, and leaders (MP4 318441 kb)
- 1.Ablon JS, Pollastri AR. The school discipline fix: changing behavior using the collaborative problem solving approach. New York: W.W. Norton; 2018.Google Scholar
- 2.Aguilar E. The art of coaching: effective strategies for school transformation. New York: Jossey Bass; 2013.Google Scholar
- 4.Averill OH, Rinaldi C. Research brief: multi-tier system of supports (MTSS). Newton: Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative; 2014.Google Scholar
- 6.CASEL. Effective social and emotional learning programs – preschool and elementary edition. 2013. Retrieved 1 Apr 2017, from http://www.casel.org/preschool-and-elementary-edition-casel-guide/.
- 7.CASEL. Effective social and emotional learning programs – middle and high school edition. 2015. Retrieved 1 Apr 2017, from http://www.casel.org/middle-and-high-school-edition-casel-guide/. CASEL, The Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning. 2017. Retrieved 1 Apr 2017 from http://www.casel.org/.
- 8.Committee for Children. Why social and emotional learning and employability skills should be prioritized in education. 2016. Retrieved 23 June 2017, from http://www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Sept.-14-2016-Congressional-Briefing-on-SEL-and-Employability-Skills.pdf.
- 9.Child Trends, Bethesda, MD. 2017. Retrieved 1 Apr 2017 from https://www.childtrends.org/ .
- 10.Cohen RW. Reframing the problem: new institutionalism and exclusionary discipline in schools. J Educ Controversy. 2013;7(1):6. Retrieved from http://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1174&context=jec.Google Scholar
- 11.Duda MA, Wilson B. Using implementation science to close the policy to practice gap. White paper. San Francisco: Literate Nation; 2015.Google Scholar
- 12.Elias MJ. The connection between academic and social emotional learning. In: Elias MJ, Arnold H, editors. The educator’s guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement. Thousand Oaks: CA Corwin Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.Epstein T, Saltzman-Benaiah J. Parenting children with disruptive behaviors: Evaluation of a collaborative problem solving pilot program. J Clin Psychol Pract. 2010;1:27–40.Google Scholar
- 14.Fableo T, Thompson MD, Plotkin M, Carmichael D, Marchbanks MP, Booth EA. Breaking schools’ rules: a statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. 2011. https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Breaking_Schools_Rules_Report_Final.pdf.
- 15.Harn B, Basaraba D, Chard D, Fritz R. The impact of schoolwide prevention efforts: lessons learned from implementing independent academic and behavior support systems. Learn Disabil: Contemp J. 2015;13:3–20.Google Scholar
- 17.Joyce BR, Showers B. Student achievement through staff development. 3rd ed. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve (ASCD); 2002.Google Scholar
- 18.Losen DJ, Gillespie J. Opportunities suspended: the disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. Los Angeles: The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Right Project; 2012. Retrieved from https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/upcoming-ccrr-research.Google Scholar
- 22.National Center on Response to Intervention. American Institutes for Research; 2017. http://www.rti4success.org/resources. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
- 24.Payton J, Weissberg RP, Durlak JA, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB, Pachan M. The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning; 2008.Google Scholar
- 26.Plog A, Epstein L, Jens K, Porter W. Sustainability of bullying intervention and prevention programs. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. New York: Routledge; 2010.Google Scholar
- 27.Rumberger RW, Losen DJ. The high cost of harsh discipline and its disparate impact. Los Angeles: The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Right Project; 2016. Retrieved from https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/the-high-cost-of-harsh-discipline-and-its-disparate-impact.Google Scholar
- 28.Schaubman A, Stetson EA, Plog A. Reducing teacher stress by implementing collaborative problem solving in a school setting. Sch Soc Work J. 2011;35:72–93.Google Scholar
- 29.Stetson EA, Plog A. Collaborative problem solving in schools: results of a year-long consultation project. Sch Soc Work J. 2016;40(2):18–36.Google Scholar
- 32.Zweifler R, DeBeers J. The children left behind: how zero tolerance impact our most vulnerable youth. Mich J Race Law. 2002;8:191–220.Google Scholar