Advertisement

Recovery and Strength-Based Practice in Long-Term Forensic Psychiatry

  • Toon WalravensEmail author
  • Joyce Bierbooms
  • Paul Ter Horst
Chapter

Abstract

Increasingly, in forensic psychiatry there is a search for a more recovery-based approach, in addition to the principles of the risks-needs-responsivity (RNR) model (Andrews DA, Bonta J (2003) The psychology of criminal conduct, 3rd edn. Anderson, Cincinnati, OH) that is most commonly used in these settings. These RNR principles presume a historical high-risk profile of patients that have had several treatment attempts and are eventually identified as patients for a long-term stay in a forensic setting. Especially in units that cater for long-term forensic patients, a view towards a human-centred approach, surpassing the boundaries of treatment and therapy, is of growing interest to the people working there and the patients staying at these units. Maintaining and improving the quality of life is central and essential in the choices that are made regarding a patient’s stay at the forensic hospital, while in many cases their perspective regarding the future is situated in that very area. To be able to contribute to maximizing the quality of life in a safe environment in or supported by a long-term forensic facility, principles of recovery-based mental healthcare are at the heart of the care that is provided to these clients.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16(4):11–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allott P, Loganathan L. Discovering hope for recovery from a British perspective – a review of a sample of recovery literature, implications for practice and systems change. West Midlands Partnerships for Mental Health, Birmingham. 2003. www.wmpmh.org.uk.
  3. 3.
    Copeland ME. Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) project: WRAP group facilitator’s kit. 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deegan P. Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1988;11(4):54–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boertien D, Van Bakel M. Handreiking voor de inzet van ervaringsdeskundigheid vanuit de geestelijke gezondheidszorg. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut; 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    GGz Nederland. Naar Herstel en gelijkwaardig burgerschap – Visie op de (langdurende) zorg aan mensen met ernstige psychiatrische aandoeningen. Amersfoort: GGz Nederland. 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van der Stel J, Buisman W. Focus op persoonlijk herstel bij psychische problemen. Den Haag: Boom/Lemma Uitgevers; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boevink W, Prinsen M, Elfers L, Droes J, Tiber M, Wilrycx GKML. Herstelondersteunende zorg, een concept in ontwikkeling. Tijdschr Rehabil. 2009;18(1):42–54.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gagne C. Rehabilitatie: een weg tot herstel. Voordracht studiedag ‘rehabilitatie en herstel’. Groningen: Lectoraat Rehabilitatie Hanzehogeschool; 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spaniol L, Wewiorski N. Phases of the recovery process from psychiatric disabilities. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2012;17(1):10.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spaniol L, Wewiorski N, Gagne C, Anthony W. The process of recovery from schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2002;14:327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mezey GC, Kavuma M, Turton P, Alexia Demetriou A, Wright C. Perceptions, experiences and meanings of recovery in forensic psychiatric patients. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2010;21(5):683–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turton P, Demetriou A, Boland W, Gillard S, Kavuma M, Mezey G, Mountford V, Turner K, White S, Zadeh E, Wright C. One size fits all: or horses for courses? Recovery-based care in specialist mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011;46:127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mann B, Matias E, Allen J. Recovery in forensic services: facing the challenge. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2014;20:125–31.  https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.113.011403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simpson AIF, Penny SR. The recovery paradigm in forensic mental health services. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011;21:299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drennan G, Wooldridge J, Aiyegbusi A, Alred D, Ayres J, Barker R, Carr S, Euson S, Lomas H, Moore E, Stanton D, Shepherd G. Making recovery a reality in forensic settings, ImROC briefing paper 10. London: Centre for Mental Health/Mental Health Network/NHS Confederation.; 2014.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walravens T. Herstelgerichte ondersteuning binnen Forensische & justitiële zorg. Ontwikkelen en implementeren van herstelgerichte detentie & Herstel Ondersteunende Zorg. Eindhoven: De Woenselse Poort/GGzE; 2015.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rapp CA. Theory, principles and methods of the strengths model of case management. In: Harris M, Bergman HC, editors. Case management for mentally ill patients. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1993.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walravens T, Albers E. Kracht en Herstelgericht werken binnen forensische kaders. Eindhoven: Walravens Zorgadvies; 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bianchi H. Justice as sanctuary: toward a new system of crime control. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deegan P. Recovery as a journey of the haeart. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1996;19(3):91–1.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hendriksen-Favier A, Nijnens K, Van Rooijen S. Handreiking voor de implementatie van herstelondersteunende zorg in de ggz. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut; 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    HMG/DH. No health without mental health. A cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: Mental Health and Disability - Department of Health; 2011.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slade M, Amering M, Farkas M, Hamilton B, O’Hagan M, Panther G, Perkins R, Shepherd G, Tse S, Whitley R. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Gestel-Timmermans H. Recovery is up to you: evaluation of a peer-run course. Tilburg: Tilburg University; 2011.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Farkas M, Gagne C, Anthony W, Chamberlin J. Implementing recovery oriented evidence based programs: identifying the critical dimensions. Community Ment Health J. 2005;41(2):141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Gestel-Timmermans H, Place C, Van Vugt M, Van Rooijen S, Van Nieuwenhuizen C. Herstelondersteunende interventies voor forensisch psychiatrische patiënten met psychotische stoornissen: een overzicht van de wetenschappelijke evidentie. Utrecht: Kwaliteitsinstituut Forensische Zorg; 2015.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dröes J, Plooy A. Herstelondersteunende zorg in Nederland: een vergelijking met Engelstalige literatuur. Tijdschr Rehabil. 2010;19(2):6–17.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Whitley R, Drake RE. Recovery: a dimensional approach. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(12):1248–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slade M. Personal recovery and mental illness: a guide for mental health professionals (values-based practice). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    HM Inspectorate of Prisons. Annual report 2015–16. London: Crown; 2016.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrews DA, ‑Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct. 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 2003.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ward T, Brown M. The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychol Crime Law. 2004;10:243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barnao M, Robertson P, Ward T. Good lives model applied to a forensic population. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2010;17(2):202–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barendregt CS, van der Laan AM, Bongers IL, van Nieuwenhuizen C. Explaining reoffending and psychiatric relapse in youth forensic psychiatry from a good lives model perspective. In: Oei TI, Groenhuijsen MS, editors. Progression in forensic psychiatry. Deventer: Kluwer; 2012. p. 415–34.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robertson P, Barnao M, Ward T. Rehabilitation frameworks in forensic mental health. Aggress Violent Behav. 2011;16:472–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paesen L. Het ‘niet willen’ behandeld worden van forensische patiënten: uiting van zelfmisleiding of van ‘traumatic progression’? De ontwikkeling en validering van de Mind-schaal. Eindhoven: GGzE; 2014.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ter Horst P, Van Ham M, Spreen M, Bogaerts S. Behandelevaluatie en klinische besluitvorming met HKT-30-ROM. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(4):228–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Websites

  1. Toon Walravens Hoofdopleider/manager opleidingen Steunend Relationeel Handelen/ Strengths: https://www.rinogroep.nl
  2. Walravens Zorgadvies: www.toonwalravens

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toon Walravens
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Joyce Bierbooms
    • 3
    • 4
  • Paul Ter Horst
    • 1
  1. 1.De Woenselse Poort Forensic-Psychiatric Hospital, Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg Eindhoven en de Kempen (GGzE) – Mental Health Care Eindhoven and de KempenEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.SRH/Strenghts RINOGroupUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.GGzEEindhovenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations