Advertisement

Long-Stay Services in German Forensic Settings

  • Boris SchifferEmail author
  • Norbert Schalast
Chapter

Abstract

In Germany, there has been a constant increase of patients in forensic psychiatric detention (Art. 63 of the penal code) for more than 30 years. Especially over the last 10 years, an extension of length of stay in hospitals has contributed substantially to this increase. Meanwhile, every third patient has continuously been living for 10 years and more in forensic care. Many long-term patients with small prospects of discharge have been diagnosed with severe personality disorders, intellectual disabilities or paraphilias and have been convicted for violent and/or sexual offences. In 2013, a law became effective necessitating an improvement and adjustment of patients’ living conditions for a different group of individuals, prisoners in preventive detention (Art. 66 of the German Penal Code), e.g. accommodation in single rooms. These legal requirements have been fulfilled only incompletely. The question if forensic long-term care is justified has been an ongoing issue of debate. In 2016, a new law took effect emphasising the principle of proportionality: only a substantial risk of severe offences may justify very long detentions. The law’s effects remain to be seen.

References

  1. 1.
    BAG Psychiatry (National Association of Owners of Hospitals): standards of longterm detention in forensic psychiatry. Paper in German. 2012. http://bflk.de/sites/default/files/doku/2012/2012.12.01-_bag-psychiatrie-standards_zur_langzeitunterbringung_im_massregelvollzug.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2017.
  2. 2.
    Bargfrede H. Enthospitalisierung forensisch-psychiatrischer Langzeitpatienten. Köln: Psychiatrie-Verlag; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett D. The chronic psychiatric patient today. J R Soc Med. 1980;73:301–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leygraf N. Psychisch kranke Straftäter: Epidemiologie und aktuelle Praxis des psychiatrischen Maßregelvollzugs. Berlin: Springer; 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrecht PA. Aspekte des Maßregelvollzugs im psychiatrischen Krankenhaus. MschrKrim. 1978;61:104–26.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rasch W. Social therapeutic treatment in hospital order clinics – the psychiatric solution. (Art. in German). Monatsschr Kriminol. 1989;72(2):115–21.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schalast N, Seifert D, Leygraf N. Patients in forensic mental hospitals in Germany with little chance of discharge from inpatient detention. (Art. in German). Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol. 2007;1(1):34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hodgins S, Müller-Isberner R. Preventing crime by people with schizophrenic disorder: the role of psychiatric services. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Müller-Isberner R, Hodgins S. Evidence-based treatment for mentally disordered offenders. In: Hodgins S, Müller-Isberner R, editors. Violence, crime, and mentally disordered offenders. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p. 7–38.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grubin D. Predictors of risk in serious sex offenders. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1997;142:332–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmucker M, Lösel F. The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. J Exp Criminol. 2015;11:597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Violent offenders. Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee M. Inventing fear of crime: criminology and the politics of anxiety. London: Willan; 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LWL-University Hospital BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.LWL-Hospital for Forensic PsychiatryHerneGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Forensic PsychiatryUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations