• Birgit VöllmEmail author


Forensic psychiatry is a subspecialty of psychiatry that operates at the interface between law and psychiatry. It is concerned with patients who have committed an often serious offence and may be detained in highly restrictive secure settings. Unlike in other areas of medicine, patients with mental disorders, and even more so those who have committed serious offences, are treated not only in order to improve their own mental health and facilitate recovery but also for the protection of the public from harm from the patient. This dual role can cause tensions and dilemmas for the practitioner who has potentially incompatible duties to the patient, third parties and the wider community [1–3]. The balance between these duties may change over time and depends on the social and political context of the practitioner. Several authors have argued that currently, i.e. at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the pendulum has swung, maybe too far, to risk aversive approaches, potentially leading to restrictive practices and increasing lengths of stay (LoS) in forensic-psychiatric settings [4].


  1. 1.
    Applebaum PS. The new preventative detention: psychiatry’s problematic responsibility for the control of violence. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(7):779–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd-Caine T. Protecting the public? Detention and release of mentally disordered offenders. Oxon: Routledge; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll A, Lyall M, Forrester A. Clinical hopes and public fears in forensic mental health. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15(3):407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrila J, de Ruiter C. The competing faces of mental health law: recovery and access versus the expanding use of preventative confinement. Amsterdam Law Forum. 2011;3:59–68.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chow WS, Priebe S. How has the extent of institutional mental healthcare changed in Western Europe? Analysis of data since 1990. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sampson S, Edworthy R, Völlm B. Provisions for long-term forensic-psychiatric care: an international comparison of 18 European countries. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2016;15:333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edworthy R, Sampson S, Völlm B. Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;47:18–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huband N, Furtado V, Schel S, Eckert M, Cheung N, Bulten E, Völlm B. Characteristics and needs of long-stay forensic psychiatric inpatients: a rapid review of the literature. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2018;17:45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Forensic PsychiatryUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations