Advertisement

Technological Development and Well-Being

  • Maria Isabel Aldinhas FerreiraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 95)

Abstract

The way progress—conducted on the basis of extracting the maximum economic and financial profit—is menacing humanity and the very planet has led to (i) a deeper awareness that all scientific and technological development somehow impact on human physical and social environment (ii) that this development has frequently come with a very high existential cost (iii) that an ethical reflection prior to any effective technological deployment is not only advisable but it is certainly a priority. The complexity of 4IT revolution imposes the adoption of a shift of paradigm from a production-oriented measurement system to one focused on the well-being of the present and future generations.

Keywords

4IT revolution Ethics Metrics for development Well-being 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    European Commission (2018) Artificial intelligence for Europe. 25 AprilGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Political Strategy Centre (201) The age of artificial intelligence: towards a European strategy for human-centric machines. EPSC Strategic Notes, 27 MarchGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferreira M (2010) On meaning: a biosemiotic approach. Biosemiotics 3(1):107–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-009-9068-y ISSN: 1875-1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferreira M, Caldas M (2013a) Modelling artificial cognition in biosemiotic terms. Biosemiotics 6(2):245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferreira M, Caldas M (2013b) The concept of Umwelt overlap and its application to multi-autonomous systems. Biosemiotics 6(3):497–514.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9185-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Kennedy R (2010) Address, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, March 18, 1968. Available at https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2010/04%20April/0410_gpd-beyond.pdf
  10. 10.
    Kuznetz S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45(1):1–282. Available http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/teaching/Kuznets55.pdf
  11. 11.
    Landefeld J, Moulton B, Platt J, Villones S (2010) GDP and beyond: measuring economic progress and sustainability. Available at https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2010/04%20April/0410_gpd-beyond.pdf
  12. 12.
    Murtin F (2017) Civil law rules on robotics: prioritizing human well-being in the age of artificial intelligence. 11 April (Brussels)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    OECD (2011) Better life initiative: measuring well-being and progress. Available at www.oecd.org/betterlifeinitiative
  14. 14.
    OECD (2011) The OECD framework for measuring well-being and progressGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD (2013) How’s life?: measuring well-being.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201392-en
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Scheleicher A (2018) How to build a 21st century school systemGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
  21. 21.
    The IEEE Global Initiative (2018) Ethically aligned design I and II. The IEEE global initiative for ethical considerations in artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de LisboaFaculdade de Letras da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior Técnico, Institute for Systems and RoboticsUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations