Partial Least Squares Path Analysis

  • J. Christopher Westland
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 22)


Early structural equation models were developed around structures of canonical correlations through statistics developed in the 1930s. These evolved into partial least squares path analysis (PLS-PA). Hermann Wold developed multiple approaches to analyzing structures of latent constructs, culminating in the computer implementations of his research assistant Jan-Bernhard Lohmöller. Lohmöller’s software popularized structural equation models as a tool for interpreting survey research into structural models built upon pairs of latent constructs. Because of its shortcomings as a statistical tool, Wold considered PSL-PA results to be only “plausible” and suitable for exploratory data analysis. This chapter surveys the uses, misuses, and pitfalls of PLS-PA in data analysis. It additionally explores common misconceptions about PLS-PA such as the function of resampling, and sample size formulas.


  1. Barclay, D., C. Higgins, and R. Thompson. 1995. “The Partial Least Squares (Pls) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration.” Technology Studies 2 (2): 285–309.Google Scholar
  2. Bastien, Philippe, Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, and Michel Tenenhaus. 2005. “PLS Generalised Linear Regression.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48 (1): 17–46.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentler, P.M. 1990. “Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 25 (2): 163–172.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, Peter M., and A.B. Mooijaart. 1989. “Choice of Structural Model via Parsimony: A Rationale Based on Precision.” Psychological Bulletin 106 (2): 315.Google Scholar
  5. Bland, J. Martin, and Douglas G. Altman. 1995. “Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method.” British Medical Journal 310 (6973): 170.Google Scholar
  6. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989a. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Vol. 8. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Boomsma, A. 1982. “The Robustness of LISREL Against Small Sample Sizes in Factor Analysis Models.” Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction 1: 149–173.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1985. “Nonconvergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in Lisrel Maximum Likelihood Estimation.” Psychometrika 50 (2): 229–242.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1987. The Robustness of Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Structural Equation Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Browne, Michael W., and Robert Cudeck. 1989. “Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 24 (4): 445–455.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1992. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sociological Methods & Research 21 (2): 230–258.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sage Focus Editions 154: 136.Google Scholar
  13. Chatelin, Yves-Marie, Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, and Michel Tenenhaus. 2002. State-of-Art on Pls Path Modeling Through the Available Software. Jouy-en-Josas: Groupe HEC.Google Scholar
  14. Chin, W.W. 1998. “Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling.” MIS Quarterly 22 (1): vii–xvi.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2010a. “Bootstrap Cross-Validation Indices for PLS Path Model Assessment.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, 83–97. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2010b. “How to Write up and Report PLS Analyses.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, 655–690. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Chin, Wynne W., Barbara L. Marcolin, and Peter R. Newsted. 2003. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research14 (2): 189–217.Google Scholar
  18. Chin, W.W., and J. Dibbern. 2009. “A Permutation Based Procedure for Multi-Group PLS Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, 171–193. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Chin, W.W., and J. Dibbern. 2010. “An Introduction to a Permutation Based Procedure for Multi-Group Pls Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross Cultural Analysis of the Sourcing of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, 171–193. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Chin, W.W., and P.R. Newsted. 1999. “Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares.” Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research 2: 307–342.Google Scholar
  21. Cochran, William G., Frederick Mosteller, and John W. Tukey. 1954. “Principles of Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 (265): 13–35.Google Scholar
  22. Dhrymes, Phoebus J. 1972. Distributed Lags: A Survey. Report. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1974. Econometrics. Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhrymes, Phoebus J., and H. Erlat. 1972. Asymptotic Properties of Full Information Estimators in Dynamic Autoregressive Simultaneous Models. Report. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  25. Dhrymes, Phoebus J., E. Philip Howrey, Saul H. Hymans, Jan Kmenta, Edward E. Leamer, Richard E. Quandt, James B. Ramsey, Harold T. Shapiro, and Victor Zarnowitz. 1972. “Criteria for Evaluation of Econometric Models. Book Section.” In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 1, Number 3, 291–325. Cambridge: NBER.Google Scholar
  26. Dijkstra, Theo. 1983. “Some Comments on Maximum Likelihood and Partial Least Squares Methods.” Journal of Econometrics 22 (1–2): 67–90.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Ding, L., W.F. Velicer, and L.L. Harlow. 1995. “Effects of Estimation Methods, Number of Indicators Per Factor, and Improper Solutions on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indices.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2 (2): 119–143.Google Scholar
  28. Ding, Z.J., and H.M. Li. 2005. Application of Monte Carlo Simulation to SEM Image Contrast of Complex Structures. Surface and Interface Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films 37 (11): 912–918.Google Scholar
  29. Frank, I.E., and J.H. Friedman. 1993. “A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools.” Technometrics 35 (2): 109–135.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerbing, D.W., and J.C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.” Journal of Marketing Research 25 (2): 186–192.Google Scholar
  31. Geweke, J.F., and K.J. Singleton. 1981. “Maximum Likelihood ‘Confirmatory’ Factor Analysis of Economic Time Series.” International Economic Review 22 (1): 37–54.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilbert, Paul. 1998. “The Evolved Basis and Adaptive Functions of Cognitive Distortions.” British Journal of Medical Psychology 71 (4): 447–463.Google Scholar
  33. ———. n.d. “PLS, Small Sample Size, and Statistical Power in Mis Research.” In Conference Proceedings. Vol. 8, 202b. Piscataway: IEEE.Google Scholar
  34. Hair, Joe F., Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. “PLS-Sem: Indeed a Silver Bullet.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152.Google Scholar
  35. Hair, Joe F., Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, and Jeannette A. Mena. 2012. “An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (3): 414–433.Google Scholar
  36. Henrich, Joseph, and Richard McElreath. 2003. “The Evolution of Cultural Evolution.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 12 (3): 123–135.Google Scholar
  37. Henseler, J., and G. Fassott. 2010. “Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models: An Illustration of Available Procedures.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, 713–735. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Henseler, J., C.M. Ringle, and R.R. Sinkovics. 2009. “The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing.” Advances in International Marketing 20 (2009): 277–319.Google Scholar
  39. Hill, Bruce M. 1979. “Posterior Moments of the Number of Species in a Finite Population and the Posterior Probability of Finding a New Species.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (367): 668–673.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1936. “Relations Between Two Sets of Variates.” Biometrika 28 (3/4): 321–377.Google Scholar
  41. Hsu, Chien-Lung, J. Christopher Westland, and Chun-Hao Chiang. 2015. “Electronic Commerce Research in Seven Maps.” Electronic Commerce Research 15 (2): 147–158.Google Scholar
  42. Hu, L., and P.M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.Google Scholar
  43. Ioannidis, J.P.A. 2005a. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124.Google Scholar
  44. Kahai, S.S., and R.B. Cooper. 2003. “Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1): 263–299.Google Scholar
  45. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd, and Herman Wold. 1980. Three-Mode Path Models with Latent Variables and Partial Least Squares (PLS) Parameter Estimation.Google Scholar
  46. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd. 1988. “The PLS Program System: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares Estimation.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 23 (1): 125–127.Google Scholar
  47. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd, and Herman O.A. Wold. 1982. Introduction to PLS Estimation of Path Models with Latent Variables, Including Some Recent Developments on Mixed Scales Variables. Neubiberg: Hochschule der Bundeswehr.Google Scholar
  48. Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd. 2013. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Lydtin, H., G Lohmöller, R. Lohmöller, H. Schmitz, and I. Walter. 1980. “Hemodynamic Studies on Adalat in Healthy Volunteers and in Patients.” Conference Proceedings. In 2nd International AdalatⓇSymposium, 112–123. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Marcoulides, George A., and Carol Saunders. 2006. “Editor’s Comments: PLS: A Silver Bullet?” MIS Quarterly. 30 (2): iii–ix.Google Scholar
  52. Marsh, Herbert W., and Michael Bailey. 1991. “Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative Models.” Applied Psychological Measurement 15 (1): 47–70.Google Scholar
  53. Marsh, H.W., and A.S. Yeung. 1997. “Causal Effects of Academic Self-concept on Academic Achievement: Structural Equation Models of Longitudinal Data.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1): 41.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 1998. “Longitudinal Structural Equation Models of Academic Self-concept and Achievement: Gender Differences in the Development of Math and English Constructs.” American Educational Research Journal 35 (4): 705.Google Scholar
  55. Marsh, H.W., B.M. Byrne, and R. Craven. 1992. “Overcoming Problems in Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Mtmm Data: The Correlated Uniqueness Model and Factorial Invariance.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 27 (4): 489–507.Google Scholar
  56. Marsh, H.W., Z. Wen, and K.T. Hau. 2004. “Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions: Evaluation of Alternative Estimation Strategies and Indicator Construction.” Psychological Methods 9 (3): 275.Google Scholar
  57. Matsumoto, Makoto, and Takuji Nishimura. 1998. “Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed Uniform Pseudo-Random Number Generator.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 8 (1): 3–30.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. McArdle, John J. 1988. “Dynamic but Structural Equation Modeling of Repeated Measures Data.” In Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, 561–614. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. McArdle, John J., and David Epstein. 1987. “Latent Growth Curves Within Developmental Structural Equation Models.” Child Development 58 (1): 110–133.Google Scholar
  60. Monecke, Armin, and Friedrich Leisch. 2012. “SemPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (3): 1–32. Google Scholar
  61. Neuhoff, John G. 2001. “An Adaptive Bias in the Perception of Looming Auditory Motion.” Ecological Psychology 13 (2): 87–110.Google Scholar
  62. Noonan, Richard, and Herman Wold. 1982. “PLS Path Modeling with Indirectly Observed Variables: A Comparison of Alternative Estimates for the Latent Variable.” In Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part II. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  63. Nunnally, J.C. 1967. Psychometric Theory. New York City: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  64. Nunnally, Jum C., Ira H. Bernstein, and others. 1967. Psychometric Theory. Vol. 226. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  65. Ringle, Christian M., Sven Wende, and Alexander Will. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  66. Ringle, C.M., and R. Schlittgen. 2007. “A Genetic Algorithm Segmentation Approach for Uncovering and Separating Groups of Data in PLS Path Modeling.” In PLS. Vol. 7, 75–78.Google Scholar
  67. Ringle, C.M., S. Wende, and A. Will. 2010. “Finite Mixture Partial Least Squares Analysis: Methodology and Numerical Examples.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, 195–218. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Ringle, Christian M., Marko Sarstedt, and Detmar W. Straub. 2012. “Editor’s Comments: A Critical Look at the Use of Pls-Sem in Mis Quarterly.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): iii–xiv.Google Scholar
  69. Sanchez, Gaston, and Gaston Sanchez (Maintainer). 2012. Package ’plsdepot’ Partial Least Squares (PLS) Data Analysis Methods, v. 0.1.17.Google Scholar
  70. Sosik, John J., Surinder S. Kahai, and Michael J. Piovoso. 2009. “Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? A Primer for Using the Partial Least Squares Data Analytic Technique in Group and Organization Research.” Group & Organization Management 34 (1): 5–36.Google Scholar
  71. Temme, Dirk, Henning Kreis, and Lutz Hildebrandt. 2006. “PLS Path Modeling.” Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.Google Scholar
  72. Tenenhaus, Michel, Silvano Amato, and Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi. 2004. “A Global Goodness-of-Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modelling.” In Proceedings of the Xlii Sis Scientific Meeting. Vol. 1, 739–742.Google Scholar
  73. Tenenhaus, Michel, Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, Yves-Marie Chatelin, and Carlo Lauro. 2005. “PLS Path Modeling.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48 (1): 159–205.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner, Malcolm E., and Charles D. Stevens. 1959. “The Regression Analysis of Causal Paths.” Biometrics 15 (2): 236–258.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1989. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, 81–126. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Velicer, W.F., J.O. Prochaska, J.L. Fava, G.J. Norman, and C.A. Redding. 1998. “Detailed Overview of the Transtheoretical Model.” Homeostasis 38: 216–233.Google Scholar
  77. Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito, Carlo N. Lauro, and Silvano Amato. 2005. “PLS Typological Regression: Algorithmic, Classification and Validation Issues.” In New Developments in Classification and Data Analysis, 133–140. Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  78. Wehrens, Ron, and B.-H. Mevik. 2007. “The PLS Package: Principal Component and Partial Least Squares Regression in R.”Google Scholar
  79. Wold, H. 1966. “Estimation of Principal Components and Related Models by Iterative Least Squares.” Multivariate Analysis 1: 391–420.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  80. Wold, Herman O.A., et al. 1961. Unbiased Predictors. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
  81. Wright, Sewall. 1921. “Correlation and Causation.” Journal of Agricultural Research 20 (7): 557–585.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  82. ———. 1934. “The Method of Path Coefficients.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 5 (3): 161–215.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. ———. 1960. “Path Coefficients and Path Regressions: Alternative or Complementary Concepts?” Biometrics 16 (2): 189–202.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information & Decision SystemsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations