Does Sharing Economy Shape Consumers’ Attitudes?

  • Merve Yanar Gürce
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


Sharing economy platforms have become very common in the last years and they have changed the way in which people consume, travel, and borrow among many other activities. Associated with sharing different goods, services among different organizations and customers have started to play an important role in today’s economic environment. According to that, the aim of this study is to investigate people’s motivations to participate in collaborative consumption in other words shed light to the attitudes and intentions of consumers about the collaborative ownership of products and services. Two focus groups were carried out with participants whose ages differ from 18 to 45. According to the results of this preliminary study, consumers’ perceived economic, environmental, and psychological benefits were found to shape their attitudes and intentions towards collaborative consumption.


Sharing economy Collaborative consumption Qualitative Focus groups Ownership 


  1. 1.
    Albinsson PA, Perera BY (2012) Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events. J Consum Behav 11:303–315. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang C, Zhang P (2012) The evolution of social commerce: the people, management, technology, and information dimensions. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 31:105–127. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prothero A, Dobscha S, Freund J, Kilbourne WE, Luchs MG, Ozanne LK, Thøgersen J (2011) Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. J Public Policy Mark 30(1):31–38. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phipps M, Ozanne L, Luchs M, Subrahmanyan S, Kapitan S, Catlin, J (2013) Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: a social cognitive framework. J Bus Res 66:1227–1234. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Rose RL, Catlin JR, Gau R, Kapitan S (2011) Toward a sustainable marketplace: expanding options and benefits for consumers. J Res Consum 19:1–12.
  6. 6.
    Oreg S, Nov O (2008) Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: the roles of contribution context and personal values. Comput Hum Behav 24:2055–2073. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 29:113–143. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen M, Sundararajan A (2017) Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. U Chi L Rev Dialogue 82:116–133. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Boston University Working Paper, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demailly D, Novel AS (2014) The sharing economy: make it sustainable. Studies No: 03/14, IDDRI, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demary V (2015) Competition in the sharing economy. IW Policy Paper No: 19/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft KölnGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schor JB (2015) Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. In: Reisch L, Thogersen J (eds) Handbook on research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schor JB (2015) The sharing economy: reports from stage one.
  15. 15.
    Böckmann M (2013) The shared economy: it is time to start caring about sharing; Value creating factors in the shared economy. Bachelor’s thesis, Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Widlok T (2004) Sharing by default? Outline of an anthropology of virtue. Anthropol Theory 4:53–70. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67:2047–2059. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crompton JL (1979) Motivations for pleasure vacation. Ann Tour Res 6:408–424. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bellotti V, Ambard A, Turner D, Gossmann C, Demkova K, Carroll JM (2015) A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, pp 1085–1094.
  20. 20.
    Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Mach Stud 38:475–487. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gremler DD (1994) Word-of-mouth about service providers: an illustration of theory development in marketing. In: Park CW, Smith D (eds) AMA winter educators’ conference proceedings, vol 5. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 62–70Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang S, Song Y (2017) Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective. J Serv Mark 31:48–62. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 28:695–704.
  24. 24.
    Burgoyne C, Young B, Walker C (2005) Deciding to give to charity: a focus group study in the context of the household economy. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 15:383–405. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cornish LS (2012) It’s good for me: it has added fibre! An exploration of the role of different categories of functional foods in consumer diets. J Consum Behav 11:292–302. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Varelas S, Georgopoulos N (2017) Porter’s competitive forces in the modern globalized hospitality sector-the case of a Greek tourism destination. J Tour Res 18:121–131Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merve Yanar Gürce
    • 1
  1. 1.İstanbul Gedik UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations