Advertisement

Impact of Joining the European Union on the Development of Transport Policy in the Republic of Latvia

  • Juris KanelsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 68)

Abstract

Over the past 25 years Latvia has rapidly evolved into a modern European state. Dramatic changes in the political and economic system of Latvia also accompanied the reforms in the field of public administration. Public administration reforms started in 1990 and the current planning period (2014–2020) is already the fourth most significant stage in the development of public administration policy. However, in the author’s opinion the greatest influence on the development of the state administration system was left to the process of preparation for Latvia’s accession to the European Union and becoming a member of the EU.

Transport is one of the central elements of the process of European integration, which helps to create an internal market conducive to employment and economic growth. Transport policy is one of the common policies of the European Union that has existed since the beginnings of the EU, as it was considered essential to guarantee three of the four freedoms of the common market set out in the Treaty of Rome in 1957—the freedom of movement of people, services and goods.

There is no doubt that also Latvia’s transport sector has evolved as a member of the European Union. The implementation of the EU legislation, technical, social and environmental standards has taken place, and very significant investments have been made for infrastructure development.

At the same time, it is difficult to find any comprehensive report on the particular impact of accession to the EU on the Latvian transport sector and the consequences of this accession. Therefore the author made a research trying to answer following questions: What changes in the improvement of the normative base and the development of infrastructure have taken place in the transport sector of the Republic of Latvia from 1999 to 2016? How has the transport policy changed in the time after Latvia’s accession to the European Union? What effects of economic, social and environmental impact in the transport sector have caused Latvia’s accession to the European Union?

Current paper is a short summary of this research.

Keywords

Public administration Integration in the EU Impact assessment Transport policy 

References

  1. 1.
    Jansone, D., Reinholde, I., Ulnicāne, I.: ES ietekme uz Latvijas publiskās pārvaldes reformu. Jaunā pārvalde. Publication by the State Civil Service. Riga 6(48), 9 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inkēns, E.: Parlamenta iesaiste valsts sagatavošanā dalībai Eiropas Savienībā. Atgriešanās Eiropā Latvijas prezidentu, premjerministru, ministru un diplomātu esejās, pp. 247–264. Zinātne, Riga (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peters, B.G.: The politics of bureaucracy, 4th (edn.), pp. 1–360. Longman Publishers, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cassese, S.: The age of administrative reforms. In: Hayward, J., Menon, A. (eds.) Governing Europe, pp. 128–138. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Project SIGMA. Improving policy instruments through impact assessment, pp. 1–52. Paper No. 31, Paris (2001). http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=ccnm/sigma/puma (2001) 1
  7. 7.
    Rogers, P.: Overview of Impact Evaluation. Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 1. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research, pp. 1–16 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barzelay, M.: The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, pp. 1–172. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Union Publications Office. Ieskats Eiropas Savienības politikā. Transports. Information leaflet, Luxembourg, pp. 1–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Central Statistical Bureau. Value added structure and changes by kind of economic activity; transportation and storage. Database—Economy and Finances, 26 March 2018. http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/ekfin/ekfin_ikgad_ikp/IK10_0060.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=073f5e9f-0c35-49b3-8288-f030e2e1580a
  12. 12.
    Eurostat. Energy, transport and environment indicators. Statistical books (2017). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/8435375/KS-DK-17-001-EN-N.pdf/18d1ecfd-acd8-4390-ade6-e1f858d746da
  13. 13.
    Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia. ES fondu ieguldījums pa reģioniem un nozarēm. Riga (2017). http://www.esfondi.lv/es-fondu-investiciju-progress-latvijas-regionos-un-pasvaldibas
  14. 14.
    Eurostat. Mobility and Transport. Statistical pocketbooks 2009–2017. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/pocketbook-2017_en
  15. 15.
    Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. Par Eiropas Komisijas 2002. gada progresa ziņojumu par Latviju. Approved by Order No. 601, 29 October 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia. Ieguvumi no Latvijas dalības Eiropas Savienībā. http://www.mfa.gov.lv/arpolitika/eiropas-savieniba-arpolitika/sabiedribas-informesana-es-jautajumos/ieguvumi-no-latvijas-dalibas-eiropas-savieniba. Accessed 05 Mar 2018
  17. 17.
    Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia. Par iestāšanās līguma anotāciju. Letter to the Ministry of Affairs, Riga, 03.03.2003, No. 03-5/17 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations