Exploring the Potential of Social Media Content for Detecting Transport-Related Activities

  • Dmitry PavlyukEmail author
  • Maria Karatsoli
  • Eftihia Nathanail
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 68)


The wide spread of social media encourages the users to share more often their activities as well as their location, leading to a rapid growth of the data volume. Current research retrieves this user-generated content on social media platforms in an effort to convert them into powerful tools, enabling transport related data collection. In this paper data from Twitter are retrieved and processed to explore their potential for providing transport related data. The main objective is to investigate the reliability of the transport related content retrieved from tweets and the transferability of analytics methods to other cities and languages. The research data set includes thousands of tweets collected in three cities: Minneapolis-Saint Paul twin cities (USA), Riga (Latvia), and Volos (Greece) in May–June 2018. Selection of the research areas is owed to substantially different environments in terms of population, language and transport infrastructure. The collected data were classified into five classes: general transport-related information, real-time information, complain, advice/question, unrelated to transport. Based on the obtained results, a cross comparison was made about efficiency of Twitter as a social media source of transport-related information in different urban environments.


Text mining Twitter Big data Classification models Location-based data 



The first author was financially supported by the specific support objective activity “Post-doctoral Research Aid” (Project id. N. of the Republic of Latvia, funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Dmitry Pavlyuk’s research project No. “Spatiotemporal urban traffic modelling using big data”.


  1. 1.
    Kuflik, T., Minkov, E., Nocera, S., Grant-Muller, S., Gal-Tzur, A., Shoor, I.: Automating a framework to extract and analyse transport related social media content: the potential and the challenges. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 77, 275–291 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zheng, X., Chen, W., Wang, P., Shen, D., Chen, S., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Yang, L.: Big data for social transportation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17, 620–630 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kokkinogenis, Z., Filguieras, J., Carvalho, S., Sarmento, L., Rossetti, R.J.F.: Mobility network evaluation in the user perspective: real-time sensing of traffic information in Twitter messages. In: Advances in Artificial Transportation Systems and Simulation, pp. 219–234. Elsevier (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salas, A., Georgakis, P., Petalas, Y.: Incident detection using data from social media. Presented at the 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), October 2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rusitschka, S., Curry, E.: Big data in the energy and transport sectors. In: Cavanillas, J.M., Curry, E., Wahlster, W. (eds.) New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy, pp. 225–244. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Oort, N., Brands, T., de Romph, E.: Short-term prediction of ridership on public transport with smart card data. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2535, 105–111 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steiger, E., Resch, B., de Albuquerque, J.P., Zipf, A.: Mining and correlating traffic events from human sensor observations with official transport data using self-organizing-maps. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 73, 91–104 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, S., Zhang, X., Cao, J., He, L., Stenneth, L., Yu, P.S., Li, Z., Huang, Z.: Computing urban traffic congestions by incorporating sparse GPS probe data and social media data. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 35, 1–30 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Z., He, Q., Gao, J., Ni, M.: A deep learning approach for detecting traffic accidents from social media data. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 86, 580–596 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pearanalytics: Twitter Study. San Antonio, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. Presented at the (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Andrea, E., Ducange, P., Lazzerini, B., Marcelloni, F.: Real-time detection of traffic from Twitter stream analysis. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16, 2269–2283 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutiérrez, C., Figuerias, P., Oliveira, P., Costa, R., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: Twitter mining for traffic events detection. In: 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI), pp. 371–378 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wanichayapong, N., Pruthipunyaskul, W., Pattara-Atikom, W., Chaovalit, P.: Social-based traffic information extraction and classification. In: 2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, pp. 107–112 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gal-Tzur, A., Grant-Muller, S.M., Kuflik, T., Minkov, E., Nocera, S., Shoor, I.: The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals. Transp. Policy 32, 115–123 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gu, Y., Qian, Z.S., Chen, F.: From Twitter to detector: real-time traffic incident detection using social media data. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 67, 321–342 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mai, E., Hranac, R.: Twitter interactions as a data source for transportation incidents. In: TRB 92nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, p. 11. Washington DC, United States (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cottrill, C.D., Derrible, S.: Leveraging big data for the development of transport sustainability indicators. J. Urban Technol. 22, 45–64 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collins, C., Hasan, S., Ukkusuri, S.: A novel transit rider satisfaction metric: rider sentiments measured from online social media data. J. Public Transp. 16, 21–45 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, Z., Ni, M., He, Q., Gao, J.: Mining Transportation Information from Social Media for Planned and Unplanned Events. Final Report. Transportation Informatics Tier I University Transportation Center, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pathak, A., Patra, B.K., Chakraborty, A., Agarwal, A.: A city traffic dashboard using social network data. Presented at the (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krumm, J., Caruana, R., Counts, S.: Learning Likely Locations. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds.) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pp. 64–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P., Ratti, C.: Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 41, 260–271 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jurdak, R., Zhao, K., Liu, J., AbouJaoude, M., Cameron, M., Newth, D.: Understanding human mobility from twitter. PLoS ONE 10, e0131469 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lenormand, M., Tugores, A., Colet, P., Ramasco, J.J.: Tweets on the road. PLoS ONE 9, e105407 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan, S.M., Ngo, L.B., Morris, E.A., Dey, K., Zhou, Y.: Social media data in transportation. In: Chowdhury, M.A., Apon, A. (eds.) Data analytics for intelligent transportation systems, pp. 265–282. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    U.S. Department of Transportation: Beyond Traffic: the Smart City Challenge. Minneapolis, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Texas A&M University Transportation Institute: Annual Urban Mobility Report (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry Pavlyuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Karatsoli
    • 2
  • Eftihia Nathanail
    • 2
  1. 1.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations