Advertisement

Techniques for Nonlinear Identification and Maximizing Modal Response

  • D. RoettgenEmail author
  • B. R. Pacini
  • R. Mayes
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Recent research has shown that weakly nonlinear structures can be modeled as a combination of nonlinear pseudo-modal models. These modal models consist of a linear spring, mass, and damper with the addition of a nonlinear element often identified using a restoring force surface technique. This approach is limited by force level achieved when exciting the system for identification. Extrapolation leads to poor results when predicting the nonlinear response; thus, there is a need to maximize the modal amplitude excited in these weakly nonlinear structures. Previous works have compared hammer testing to shaker testing using windowed sinusoidal input forces. This appeared to be a promising technique to increasing the excited modal amplitude. In this work the windowed sinusoidal technique is further investigated to understand how window parameters (such as window width) can be optimized to maximize the modal amplitude obtained during the identification process.

Keywords

Nonlinear system identification Experimental techniques Structural dynamics Modal analysis Nonlinear testing methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Segalman, D.: A Modal Approach to Modeling Spatially Distributed Vibration Energy Dissipation. Sandia National Labs SAND2010-4763, Albuquerque, NM (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deaner, B.J.: Modeling the Nonlinear Damping of Jointed Structures Using Modal Models. Masters of Science Thesis: University of Wisconsin, Madison (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roettgen, D., Allen, M.: Nonlinear characterization of a bolted, industrial structure using a modal framework. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 84, 152 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pacini, B.R., Mayes, R.L., Owens, B.C., Schultz, R.: Nonlinear Finite Element Model Updating, Part I: Experimental Techniques and Nonlinear Modal Model Parameter Extraction. In: International Modal Analysis Conference XXXV, Garden Grove, CA (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayes, R.L., Pacini, B.R., Roettgen, D.R.: A Modal Model to Simulate Typical Structural Dynamic Nonlinearity. In: International Modal Analysis Conference XXXIV, Orlando, FL (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Segalman, D.J.: A Four-Parameter Iwan Model for Lap-Type Joints. J. Appl. Mech. 72, 752–760 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roettgen, D., Pacini, B., Mayes, R., Schoenherr, T.: Experimental-Analytical Substructuring of a Complicated Jointed Structure Using Nonlinear Modal Models. In: International Modal Analysis Conference XXXVI, Orlando, FL (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eriten, M., Kurt, M., Luo, G., Vakakis, A.: Nonlinear system idenfitication of frictional effects in a beam with a bolted joint connection. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 39, 245–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerschen, G., Worden, K., Vakakis, A., Golinval, J.C.: Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20(3), 505–592 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spottswood, S., Allemang, R.: On the investigation of some parameter identification and experimental modal filtering issues for nonlinear reduced order models. Exp. Mech. 47, 511–521 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris, F.: On the use of windows for hamonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform. In: Proceedings of the IEEE (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural DynamicsSandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations