Two Approaches to Country Risk Evaluation
Weighted attribute estimates and fuzzy inference methods are based on two approaches to evaluate the levels of country risk which are considered on the base of expert judgments. To obtain the final estimates of the country risk levels for an arbitrary set of alternatives these approaches are used on the base of expert conclusions regarding factors of country risk. The study is completed by comparative analysis of finale estimates of country risks.
KeywordsCountry risk Concordance coefficient Estimate Expert conclusion Fuzzy set Fuzzy conclusion
The authors consider necessary to express their sincere appreciation to the direction of the Institute of Control Systems of the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences represented by professors T. A. Aliev and O. G. Nusratov for the help that they rendered during the process of writing and preparing this article.
- 1.McClenny, L.D., et al.: BoolFilter: an R package for estimation and identification of partially-observed boolean dynamical systems. Biometrics 18(1), 2–8 (2017)Google Scholar
- 2.Mussel, C., et al.: BoolNet package vignette. http://medicinaycomplejidad.org/pdf/BoolNet_package_vignette.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2017
- 3.PwC Global Risk podcast series. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/advisory/consulting/risk/coso-erm-framework/podcasts.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2017
- 4.Lin, L.: A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56, 324–325 (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Rzayev, R.R.: Intellectual Analyses in Decision Support Systems. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Verlag (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 9.Rzayev, R.R.: Analytical Support for Decision-Making in Organizational Systems. Palmarium Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken (2016). (in Russian)Google Scholar