Advertisement

A Priority and QoS-Aware Scheduler for LTE Based Public Safety Networks

  • Mahir AyhanEmail author
  • Hyeong-Ah Choi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 70)

Abstract

4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) has been selected by the U.S. federal and EU authorities to be the access technology for public safety broadband networks (PSBNs) that would allow first responders to seamlessly communicate between agencies nationwide. From Release 11 on, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has been outlining the standards for the features that will enable LTE to be used as part of a PSBN. The requirements for scheduling user equipments (UEs) with appropriate quality of service (QoS) and priority has not been addressed yet. In this paper, we highlight the scheduling challenges in PSBNs and propose a solution which considers all the QoS parameters. Proposed algorithm minimizes packet losses while scheduling packets in a priority and QoS aware fashion. Simulations results illustrate superiority of the proposed scheduler.

Keywords

Scheduling Public Safety Broadband Network LTE Priority QoS OFDMA High throughput 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was in part supported by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) through Professional Research Experience Program—Communications Technology Laboratory (PREP-CTL) with award number 70NANB16H021.

References

  1. 1.
    Wyatt, E.: 9 years after 9/11, public safety radio not ready (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Government Technology: A how-to guide for LTE in public safety. Technical report (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NPSTC: Priority and quality of service in the nationwide public safety broadband network. Technical report, National Public Safety Telecommunications Council, Aug 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Capozzi, F., Piro, G., Grieco, L.A., Boggia, G., Camarda, P.: Downlink packet scheduling in LTE cellular networks: key design issues and a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 15(2), 678–700 (2013). (Second)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ayhan, M., Zhao, Y., Choi, H.A.: Utilizing geometric mean in proportional fair scheduling: enhanced throughput and fairness in LTE DL. In: 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, Dec 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S., Skold, J., Beming, P.: 3G Evolution, 2nd edn. HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband. Academic Press (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jalali, A., Padovani, R., Pankaj, R.: Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system. In: 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, 2000. VTC 2000-Spring Tokyo, vol. 3, pp. 1854–1858 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pokhariyal, A., Pedersen, K.I., Monghal, G., Kovacs, I.Z., Rosa, C., Kolding, T.E., Mogensen, P.E.: HARQ aware frequency domain packet scheduler with different degrees of fairness for the UTRAN long term evolution. In: 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference–VTC2007-Spring, pp. 2761–2765, Apr 2007Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, J., Niu, Z.: Buffer-aware and traffic-dependent packet scheduling in wireless OFDM networks. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007. WCNC 2007, pp. 1554–1558. IEEE, Mar 2007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwan, R., Leung, C., Zhang, J.: Multiuser scheduling on the downlink of an LTE cellular system. Rec. Lett. Commun. 2008, 3:1–3:4 (2008). (January)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Monghal, G., Pedersen, K.I., Kovacs, I.Z., Mogensen, P.E.: QoS oriented time and frequency domain packet schedulers for the UTRAN long term evolution. In: VTC Spring 2008—IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 2532–2536, May 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandrasegaran, K., Mohd Ramli, H.A., Basukala, R.: Delay-prioritized scheduling (DPS) for real time traffic in 3GPP LTE system. In: 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference, pp. 1–6, Apr 2010Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaki, Y., Weerawardane, T., Gorg, C., Timm-Giel, A.: Multi-QoS-aware fair scheduling for LTE. In: 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–5, May 2011Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bojovic, B., Baldo, N.: A new channel and qos aware scheduler to enhance the capacity of voice over LTE systems. In: 2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals Devices (SSD14), pp. 1–6, Feb 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan, Y., Lunden, P., Kuusela, M., Valkama, M.: Efficient semi-persistent scheduling for VoIP on EUTRA downlink. In: 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5, Sept 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cox, C.: An Introduction to LTE: LTE, LTE-Advanced, SAE, VoLTE and 4G Mobile Communications. Wiley, Chichester (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    3GPP. Ts 23 203 (v13.6.0) (rel. 13). Technical report, 3GPP, Mar 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    NS-3 Consortium. ns-3 network simulator (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAmerican UniversityWashington DCUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceGeorge Washington UniversityWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations