Advertisement

Extraoral Radiography in Pediatric Dental Practice

  • Johan Aps
Chapter

Abstract

Extraoral radiography means that both the image detector and the X-ray machine are placed outside the patient’s mouth. The X-ray source and the image detector have to be aligned in order to generate the desired image quality. There are two ways of obtaining extraoral radiographs: the first way is to work with a stationary X-ray source and image detector and the second is to have the X-ray source and image detector move in synchronicity in opposite directions. The first technique results in a plain radiographic image, while the other technique results in a tomographic image. The latter implies a focal trough, which ideally contains all the tissues one is interested in. More explanation is offered below.

Further Reading

  1. Goulston R, Davies J, Horner K, Murphy F. Dose optimization by altering the operating potential and tube current exposure time product in dental cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofacial radiology. 2016;45:20150254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graham DT, Cloke P, Vosper M. Principles of radiological physics. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Hendee WR, Russell Ritenour E. Medical imaging physics. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Liss; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Iannucci JM, Howerton LJ. Dental radiography. In: Principles and techniques. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Mettler FA Jr, Upton AC. Medical effects of ionizing radiation. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B, on behalf of DIMITRA Research Group (http://www.dimitra.be). Cone-beam CT in pediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pauwels R, Seynaeve L, Henriques JCG, de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PC, Westphalen FH, Rubira-Bullen IRF, Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Rockenbach MIB, Haiter-Neto F, Pittayapat P, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mA reduction. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44:20150108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ribeiro Nascimento HA, Almeida Andrade ME, Gomes Frazao MA, Nascimento EHL, Ramos-Perez FMM, Queiroz Freitas D. Dosimetry in CBCT with different protocols: emphasis on small FOVs including exams for TMJ. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):511–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rottke D, Patzelt S, Poxleitner P, Schulze D. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013;42:20120417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, The Sedentexct Project Consortium. Estimation of pediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 5th ed. Amsterdam: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology. In: Principles and interpretation. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Aps
    • 1
  1. 1.Dental SchoolUniversity of Western AustraliaWestern AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations