Advertisement

Introduction: Politics of Sensibilities, Society 4.0 and Digital Labour

  • Adrian Scribano
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to offer an introductory overview in which the current contents of the research on Society 4.0, digital labour and politics of the sensibilities are exposed. The objective of this chapter is not only to provide the reader with a clear picture of how the three fields of study are connected but also to facilitate the comprehension of the general proposal on the politics of the sensibilities from the perspective of a sociology of bodies/emotions. The main objective is to understand some of the deepest transformations of current society through the articulation of these three fields. This chapter seeks to make visible how the spheres of Society 4.0 interrelate with the features of digital labour in such a way as to generate the current politics of sensibilities. In the search for connections between the transformations in work and society, this chapter ends by suggesting the idea of the emergence of “sensibilities of platforms”.

Keywords

Sensibilities Digital labour Bodies Emotions Society 4.0 

References

  1. Andrejevic, M. (2012). Exploitation in the Data Mine. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund, & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and Surveillance. The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media (pp. 71–88). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The Labor of User Co-creators. Convergence, 14(4), 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caraway, B. (2010). Online Labour Markets: An Inquiry into oDesk Providers. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 4(2), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comor, E. (2010). Digital Prosumption and Alienation. Ephemera, 10(3/4), 439–454.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, A., Reza Habibi, M., & Larochec, M. (2017). Materialism and the Sharing Economy: A Cross-Cultural Study of American and Indian Consumers. Journal of Business Research, 82, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, E. (2012). How Less Alienation Creates More Exploitation. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuchs, C. (2010). Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 26(3), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuchs, C. (2012a). Dallas Smythe Today. The Audience Commodity, the Digital Labour Debate, Marxist Political Economy and Critical Theory. Prolegomena to a Digital Labour Theory of Value. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 692–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuchs, C. (2012b). With or Without Marx? With or Without capitalism? A Rejoinder to Adam Arvidsson and Eleanor Colleoni. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2014). Digital Workers of the World Unite! A Framework for Critically Theorising and Analysing Digital Labour. TripleC, 12(2), 486–563.Google Scholar
  13. Global Web Index. (2018). Social Global Web Index’s Flagship Report on the Latest Trends in Social Media. H1 2018. www.globalwebindex
  14. Huws, U. (2016). Working Online, Living Offline: Labour in the Internet Age. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M. S., Gerber, E. M., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., & Horton, J. J. (2013). The Future of Crowd Work. CSCW ‘13, 1301–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441923.
  16. Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious Playbour: Modders and the Digital Games Industry. The Fibreculture Journal, 5. Retrieved from February 27, 2018 http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-and-the-digital-games-industry/
  17. Lansen, A., & García, A. (2015). “…But I Haven’t Got a Body to Show”: Self-Pornification and Male Mixed Feelings in Digitally Mediated Seduction Practices. Sexualities, 18(5/6), 714–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marx, K. (1867). Capital: Vol I. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. OECD. (2015). Skills for Social Progress: The Power of Social and Emotional Skills, OECD Skills Studies. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264226159-en.
  20. Parente, R. C., Geleilate, J. M. G., & Rong, K. (2018). The Sharing Economy Globalization Phenomenon: A Research Agenda. Journal of International Management, 24, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79–87.Google Scholar
  22. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scholz, T. (2013). Digital Labor. The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Scribano, A. (2017). Normalization, Enjoyment and Bodies/Emotions: Argentines Sensibilities. New York: Nova Science Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Scribano, A. (2018). Politics and Emotions. Houston: Studium Press.Google Scholar
  26. Simply Measured. (2017). The State of Social Marketing. 2017 Annual Report. (Online): Extraído el 30 de noviembre de 2017 desde: https://get.simplymeasured.com/rs/135-YGJ-288/images/SM_StateOfSocial-2017.pdf
  27. Tapscott, D. (1995). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  29. UNCTAD. (2017). Information Economy Report 2017. Digitalization, Trade and Development. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Scribano
    • 1
  1. 1.CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations