Advertisement

Coherence of Visual and Epistemic Elements in Multimodal Artifacts for the Cultural Heritage Education. The Case Study of the Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci

  • Giampiero Dalai
  • Berta Martini
  • Luciano PerondiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 919)

Abstract

In this article we hypothesize that, in an interactive system for the representation of the knowledge related to a work of art, it is possible to detect a relation between visual coherence (in particular, the coherence of the number of constituent traits in graphical elements) and epistemic coherence (in particular, the coherence of the forms of knowledge), and that this relation affects the readability and the understanding of specific contents of the work of art. This article describes an experimental design which is conceived for verifying the validity of the research hypothesis. The planned research allows to describe a valid criterion for the development of a system of signs and contents related to a work of art.

Keywords

Visual rhetoric Synsemia Constituent traits Epistemic coherence Visual coherence Cultural heritage education 

References

  1. Antinucci F (2004) Comunicare nel museo. Editori Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailer-Jones D (2002) Models, metaphors and analogies. In: Machamer P, Silberstein M (eds) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 108–127Google Scholar
  3. Bertin J (2011) Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. Esri Press, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonora G, D’Ugo R, Dalai G, Rosa DD, Imperato A, Martini B, Perondi L (2017) The project “interactive topography of Dante’s inferno”. Transfer of knowledge and design of didactic tools. Proceedings 1(9):875.  https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1090875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonora G, Dalai G, Rosa DD, Imperato A, Martini B, Perondi L (in press) Sinsemia as a tool for designing interactive artifacts for teaching. The case study of the topography of Dante’s inferno and the detailed definition of reference frame. In: Proceedings of the 2CO2 Communicating Complexity International Design Conference. La Laguna – Tenerife, Spain, 23–25 November 2017Google Scholar
  6. Bonfantini M (2000) Breve corso di semiotica. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonsiepe G (1995) Dall’oggetto all’interfaccia: mutazioni del design. Feltrinelli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  8. Eco U (2016) La struttura assente: La ricerca semiotica e il metodo strutturale. La nave di Teseo, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. von Engelhardt J (2002) The Language of graphics: a framework for the analysis of syntax and meaning in maps, charts and diagrams. institute for language, logic and computation. Universiteit van Amsterdam, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Gnoli C, Marino V, Rosati L (2006) Organizzare la conoscenza. Tecniche Nuove, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  11. Lussu G (2003) La lettera uccide. Storie di grafica, 2nd edn. Stampa Alternativa & Graffiti, ViterboGoogle Scholar
  12. Novak JD (2001) L’apprendimento significativo. Erickson, TrentoGoogle Scholar
  13. Nuzzaci A (2006) Musei, Pubblici e Didattiche. La didattica museale tra sperimentalismo, modelli teorici e proposte operative. Edizioni Lionello Giordano, CosenzaGoogle Scholar
  14. Martini B (2016) Il museo sensibile. Le tecnologie ICT al servizio della trasmissione della conoscenza. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  15. Martini B (2012) Il sistema della formazione ai saperi. Soggetti Oggetti Istituzioni. Tecnodid, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  16. Martini B (2011) Pedagogia dei saperi. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  17. Martini B (2005) Formare ai saperi. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  18. Migliore T (2007) Introduzione. In: Migliore T (ed) Gruppo µ. Trattato del segno visivo: per una retorica dell’immagine. Bruno Mondadori, Milano, pp XII–XIIIGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giampiero Dalai
    • 1
  • Berta Martini
    • 2
  • Luciano Perondi
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Alpaca Società CooperativaFerraraItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di studi umanisticiUniversità degli studi di Urbino Carlo BoUrbinoItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento Pianificazione e Progettazione in Ambienti ComplessiUniversità IUAV di VeneziaVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations