Advertisement

Visitor’s Approaches, Personality Traits and Psycho-Physiological Well-Being in Different Art Style Museums

  • Stefano MastandreaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 919)

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to address a line of research, conducted in the last ten years, on visitor’s approaches to different art styles museums (ancient vs. modern), and the educational aspects regarding the young adult’s museum visits experience.

Keywords

Art museum Visitor’s approach Art styles Art and well-being Young adults museum’s visits 

References

  1. Antinucci F (2004) Comunicare nel museo. Laterza, RomaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels DM, Hein GE (2003) Learning in setting than schools. Educ Res 32(6):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chirumbolo A, Brizi A, Mastandrea S, Mannetti L (2014) Beauty is no quality in things themselves: epistemic motivation affects implicit preferences for art. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110323.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clow A, Fredhoi C (2006) Normalisation of salivary cortisol levels and self-report stress by a brief lunchtime visit to an art gallery by London City workers. J Holist Healthc 3(2):29–32Google Scholar
  5. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
  6. Curci A, Lanciano T, Maddalena C, Mastandrea S, Sartori G (2015) Flashbulb memories of the Pope’s resignation: explicit and implicit measures across differing religious groups. Memory 23(4):529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DiMaggio P (1996) Are art-museum visitors different from other people? The relationship between attendance and social and political attitudes in the United States. Poetics 24:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feist GJ, Brady TR (2004) Openness to experience, nonconformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Stud Arts 22:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming D (1999) A question of perception. Mus J 4:29–31Google Scholar
  10. Furnham A, Walker J (2001) Personality and judgments of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings. Eur J Pers 15:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanciano T, Curci A, Mastandrea S, Sartori G (2013) Do automatic mental associations detect a flashbulb memory? Memory 21(4):482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redón J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, Christiaens T, Cifkova R, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Galderisi M, Grobbee DE, Jaarsma T, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE, Sirnes PA, Sleight P, Viigimaa M, Waeber B, Zannad F (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Blood pressure 22:193–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mason D, McCarthy C (2008) The feeling of exclusion: young people’s perceptions of art galleries. Mus Manage Curatorship 21:20–31Google Scholar
  14. Mastandrea S (2011) Il ruolo delle emozioni nell’esperienza estetica. Rivista di Estetica 48(3):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mastandrea S (2014) How emotions shape aesthetic experiences. In: Tinio P, Smith J (eds) The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 500–518Google Scholar
  16. Mastandrea S (2015) Psicologia dell’arte. Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  17. Mastandrea S (2017) Psicologia della percezione. Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  18. Mastandrea S, Maricchiolo F (2014) Implicit and explicit aesthetic evaluation of design objects. Art Percept 1–2(2):141–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mastandrea S, Umiltà MA (2016) Futurist art: motion and aesthetics as a function of title. Front Hum Neurosci 10:201.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mastandrea S, Bartoli G, Bove G (2007) Learning through ancient art and experiencing emotions with contemporary art: comparing visits in two different museums. Empirical Stud Arts 25(2):173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastandrea S, Bartoli G, Bove G (2009) Preferences for ancient and modern art museums: visitor experiences and personality characteristics. Psychol Aesthetic Creativity Arts 3(3):164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mastandrea S, Bartoli G, Carrus G (2011) The automatic aesthetic evaluation of different art and architectural styles. Psychol Aesthetic Creativity Arts 5(2):126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mastandrea S, Maricchiolo F (eds) (2016) The role of the museum in the education of young adults: motivation, emotion and learning. Roma Tre Press. ISBN 978-88-97524-83-0Google Scholar
  24. Mastandrea S, Maricchiolo F, Carrus G, Giovannelli I, Giuliani V, Berardi D (2018) Visits to figurative art museums may lower blood pressure and stress. Arts Health 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2018.1443953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nardi E (2004) Museo e pubblico: Un rapporto educativo. Franco Angeli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  26. Nuzzaci A (2002) I musei pedagogici. Kappa Edizioni, RomaGoogle Scholar
  27. Prince D, Schadla-Hall RT (1985) The image of the museum: a case study of Kingston upon Hull. Mus J 85:39–45Google Scholar
  28. Zuckerman M (1979) Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mastandrea S, Crano W (2019) Peripheral factors affecting the evaluation of artworks. Empir Stud Arts 37(1):82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations