Advertisement

Remediating the Historical City. Ubiquitous Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Enhancement

  • S. BrusaporciEmail author
  • F. Graziosi
  • F. Franchi
  • P. Maiezza
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 919)

Abstract

The chapter presents the outcomes of an experience that rises from the realization of L’Aquila Smart City (Italy). Its realization roots on the possibly given by the realization of a smart tunnel with a net of optical fibers and by 5G mobile networking. This system of real time and diffused data computing and transmission allows the project of a ubiquitous Augmented Reality (AR) application. It favors the relationship between buildings and urban spaces with different kind of information, mainly of visual nature, such as 3D models, images, videos, texts. This interdisciplinary study gives the opportunity to develop a theoretical and methodological reflection on AR as mixed-media and on the relation that it establishes between tangible heritage and information, also in relation with the current post-digital approach to cultural heritage.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Digital culture Cultural heritage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research has received funding from the Italian Government under Cipe resolution n. 135 (Dec. 21, 2012), project INnovating City Planning through Information and Communication Technologies (INCIPICT).

Although the paper was conceived unitedly, S. Brusaporci wrote the paragraphs “The reality-based turn of virtuality”, “Augmented reality as mixed-media” and “Conclusions; F. Graziosi is the author of paragraph “Ubiquitous AR for L’Aquila smart city”; F. Franchi wrote “AR-UNIVAQ” while P. Maiezza is the author of the paragraph “AR for the historic city”.

References

  1. Baudrillard J (1976) L’echange symbolique et la mort. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry DM, Dieter M (eds) (2015) Postdigital Aesthetics. Art, Computation and Design. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolter JD, Grusin R (1999) Remediation – Understanding New Media. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonacini E, (2014) La realtà aumentata e le app culturali in Italia: storie da un matrimonio in mobilità. Il capitale culturale, vol IX, pp 89–121Google Scholar
  5. Brusaporci S (2015) On visual computing for architectural heritage. In: Brusaporci S (ed) Handbook of research on emerging digital tools for architectural surveying, modeling, and representation. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 94–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusaporci S, Ruggieri G, Sicuranza F, Maiezza P (2017) Augmented reality for historical storytelling. The INCIPICT project for the reconstruction of tangible and intangible image of L’Aquila historical centre. In: Proceedings IMMAGINI?, 27–28 Nov, Brixen. ISSN 2504-3900Google Scholar
  7. Brusaporci S (2017a) Della rappresentazione in epoca post-digitale. In: Luigini A (ed) Lineis Describere. Sette seminari tra rappresentazione e formazione. Libria, Melfi, pp 47–59Google Scholar
  8. Brusaporci S (2017b) Digital innovations in architectural heritage conservation: emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  9. Brusaporci S (2018) Advanced mixed heritage: a visual turn through digitality and reality of architecture. Int. J. Comput. Methods Heritage Sci. 2:40–60 ISSN: 2473-5345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brusaporci S, Maiezza P, Tata A (2018) For a cultural-based smart city. In: Salerno R (ed) Rappresentazione materiale/immateriale - Drawing as (in) tangible, pp 73–80Google Scholar
  11. Clini P, Quattrini R, Frontoni E, Pierdicca R, Nespeca R (2016) Real/not real: pseudo-holography and augmented reality applications for cultural heritage. In: Ippolito A, Cigola M (eds) Handbook of research on emerging technologies for digital preservation and information modeling. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 201–227Google Scholar
  12. Ferraris M (2011) Manifesto of New Realism. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Z, Hui P, Peylo C, Chatzopoulos D (2013) Mobile augmented reality survey: a bottom-up approach. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1309.4413
  14. Jenkins H (2007) Reconsidering Digital Immigrants. www.henryjenkins.org/2007/12/reconsidering_digital_immigran.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  15. Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E77-D(12):1321–1329Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell WJT (1986) Iconology: image, text, ideology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell WJT (1994) Picture Theory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchel WJT (1996) What do Pictures ‘Really’ Want? October 77:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell WJT (2017) Pictorial Turn. Raffaello Cortina Editore, MilanGoogle Scholar
  20. Murray J (1997) Hamlet on the holodeck. The future of narrative in cyberspace. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9(5):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Purgar K (ed) (2017) W.J.T. Mitchell’s Image Theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutherland I (1965) The ultimate display. Proc IFIP Congr 2:506–508Google Scholar
  24. The Onlife Manifesto (2015). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/onlife-manifesto. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  25. UNESCO (2003) Charter on the Preservation of the Digital HeritageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Brusaporci
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Graziosi
    • 2
  • F. Franchi
    • 2
  • P. Maiezza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and MathematicsUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations