Advertisement

Performance Analysis of 4.08 KWp Grid Connected PV System Based on Simulation and Experimental Measurements in Casablanca, Morocco

  • Amine HaibaouiEmail author
  • Bouchaib Hartiti
  • Abderrazzak Elamim
  • Abderraouf Ridah
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 912)

Abstract

The energy generated from photovoltaic (PV) panels depends usually on the PV cell technology used and meteorological data at a given location. This work presents a comparison study of 2 × 2.04 KWp grid-connected PV module technology systems, constituted by two types of photovoltaic solar panels (Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline)-silicon, installed on the roof of faculty of sciences Ben M’sik Casablanca. Three types of results are presented. The first type is the performance evaluation for one year of exposure under natural outdoor conditions including: System efficiency, reference and final yield as well as the performance ratio. The second type is based on simulation data given by PVsyst 6.4.3, compared to experimental data obtained through the inverters of the installation and meteorological station. The third type is an economic analysis including the most commonly used financial parameters, which are the annual incomes (Ai), the cost of electricity of operating period (LCOE) and the payback period (PB) in order to determine the optimal technology for the city. The investigation of the annual productivity shows that Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline deliver an energy of 3325,711 Kwh/year and 3250,842 Kwh/year respectively. The experimental results show that the monocrystalline-silicon is the best technology for Casablanca city.

Keywords

Performance analysis Simulation Economic analysis PV cell Grid-connected Monocrystalline Polycrystalline 

Notes

Acknowledgment

All the authors as well as all the rest of the “PROPRE.MA” partner are grateful to IRESEN for financing this study and would like to thank all the IRESEN staff for their support.

References

  1. 1.
    Attari, K., Elyaakoubi, A., Asselman, A.: Performance analysis and investigation of a grid-connected photovoltaic installation in Morocco. Energy Rep. 2, 261–266 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Yilmaz, S., et al.: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 1015–1024 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abella, M.A., Chenlo, F., Nofuentes, G., Ramírez, M.T.: Analysis of spectral effects on the energy yield of different PV (photovoltaic) technologies: the case of four specific sites. Energy 67(1), 435–443 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raugei, M., Frankl, P.: Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: current state of the art and future outlooks. Energy 34, 392–399 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, W., Yang, H., Fang, Z.: A novel model for photovoltaic array performance prediction. Appl. Energy 84, 1187–1198 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, J.-Y., Jeon, G.-Y., Hong, W.-H.: The performance and economical analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in Daegu. Korea. Appl. Energy 86, 265–272 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, D.H.W., Cheung, K.L., Lam, T.N.T., Chan, W.W.H.: A study of grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system in Hong Kong. Appl. Energy 90, 122–127 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Su, Y., Chan, L.-C., Shu, L., Tsui, K.-L.: Real-time prediction models for output power and efficiency of grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems. Appl. Energy 93, 319–326 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma, V., Kumar, A., Sastry, O.S., Chandel, S.S.: Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions. Energy 58, 511–518 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Padmavathi, K., Daniel, S.A.: Performance analysis of a 3 MWp grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 17, 615–625 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chemisana, D., Lamnatou, C.: Photovoltaic-green roofs: an experimental evaluation of system performance. Appl. Energy 119, 246–256 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, F., Baek, S.-H., Kim, J.H.: Intensity dependency of photovoltaic cell parameters under high illumination conditions: an analysis. Appl. Energy 133, 356–362 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrada, P., Araya, F., Marzo, A., Fuentealba, E.: Performance analysis of photovoltaic systems of two different technologies in a coastal desert climate zone of Chile. Sol. Energy 114, 356–363 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, X., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Lei, W., Si, X., Du, W., et al.: Monitoring the performance of the building attached photovoltaic (BAPV) system in Shanghai. Energy Build. 88, 174–182 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, K.A., Sundareswaran, K., Venkateswaran, P.R.: Performance study on a grid connected 20 KWp solar photovoltaic installation in an industry in Tiruchirappalli (India). Energy. Sustain. Dev. 23, 294–304 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bakos, G.C.: Distributed power generation: a case study of small scale PV power plant in Greece. Appl. Energy 86, 1757–1766 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khatib, T., Sopian, K., Kazem, H.A.: Actual performance and characteristic of a grid connected photovoltaic power system in the tropics: a short term evaluation. Energy Convers. Manage. 71, 115–119 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adaramola, M.S., Vågnes, E.E.T.: Preliminary assessment of a small-scale rooftop PV-grid tied in Norwegian climatic conditions. Energy Convers. Manage. 90, 458–465 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tripathi, B., Yadav, P., Rathod, S., Kumar, M.: Performance analysis and comparison of two silicon material based photovoltaic technologies under actual climatic conditions in Western India. Energy Convers. Manage. 80, 97–102 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pietruszko, S.M., Gradzki, M.: Performance of a grid connected small PV system in Poland. Appl. Energy 74, 177–184 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aarich, N., Erraïssi, N., Akhsassi, M., Lhannaoui, A., Raoufi, M., Bennouna, A.: “Propre.Ma” project: roadmap & preliminary results for gridconnected PV yields maps in Morocco. In: IEEE International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), pp. 774–777 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bhattacharjee, S., Bhakta, S.: Analysis of system performance indices of PV generator in a cloudburst precinct. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 4, 62–72 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    IEC: Photovoltaic system performance monitoring—guidelines for measurement, data exchange, and analysis IEC Standard 61724, Geneva, Switzerland (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ayompe, L.M., Duffy, A., McCormack, S.J., Conlon, M.: Measured performance of a 1.72 kW rooftop grid connected photovoltaic system in Ireland. Energ. Convers. 52, 816–825 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guenounou, A., Malek, A., Aillerie, M.: Comparative performance of PV panels of different technologies over one year of exposure: Application to a coastal Mediterranean region of Algeria. Energy Convers. Manage. 114, 356–363 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huld, T., Šúri, M., Dunlop, E.D.: Comparison of potential solar electricity output from fixed-inclined and two-axis tracking photovoltaic modules in Europe. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 16, 47–59 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Darling, S.B., You, F., Veselka, T., Velosa, A.: Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3133–3139 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Branker, K., Pathak, M.J.M., Pearce, J.M.: A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(9), 4470–4482 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vats, K., Tomar, V., Tiwari, G.N.: Effect of packing factor on the performance of a building integrated semitransparent photovoltaic thermal (BISPVT) system with air duct. Energy Build 53, 159–165 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Allouhi, A., Saadani, R., Kousksou, T., Saidur, R., Jamil, A., Rahmoune, M.: Grid-connected PV system installed on institutional buildings: Technology comparison, energy analysis and economic performance. Energy and Buildings http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.054

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amine Haibaoui
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Bouchaib Hartiti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abderrazzak Elamim
    • 1
  • Abderraouf Ridah
    • 3
  1. 1.ERDyS Laboratory, MEEM and DD GroupHassan II University of Casablanca, FSTMMohammediaMorocco
  2. 2.ICTPUNESCOTriesteItaly
  3. 3.LIMAT Laboratory, Department of Physics FSBHassan II Casablanca UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations