Advertisement

“Well I hate to admit it but I can’t remember”

Knowing, Remembering and Performing in Everyday Life with Dementia
  • Heidi E. Hamilton
Chapter

Abstract

In this book, I examine the ways in which participant frameworks, physical environments, activity types, and interactional goals shape how cognitive challenges and strengths are navigated as “our mental states make contact with the world” (Hughes, Thinking through dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011: 265)—and, crucially, how these aspects of context impact the self-esteem of individuals with dementia and their conversational partners. To this end, I analyze the language used in everyday conversations, medical visits, memory loss support group meetings, and specially designed art gallery tours through the lens of epistemic discourse analysis (van Dijk, Discourse Studies, 15, 497–500, 2013; Heritage, Research on Language and Social Interaction (ROLSI), 45, 30–52, 2012) in combination with Goffman’s (Interaction ritual. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1967; Relations in public. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1971) and Brown and Levinson’s (Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) insights into face maintenance in everyday social interaction. I explore how individuals’ changes in cognition may impact the faces of these individuals, leaving some to feel ashamed, anxious, or angry; others to feel patronized, infantilized, or overly dependent; and still others to feel threatened in both ways. In this examination, I keep in clear and central focus the important discursive choices made by healthy interactional partners that may end up minimizing or exacerbating these feelings.

References

  1. Basting, A. D. (2009). Forget memory: Creating better lives for people with dementia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bayles, K., & Kaszniak, A. (1987). Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bayles, K., & Tomoeda, C. K. (2014). Cognitive-communication disorders of dementia: Definition, diagnosis, and treatment. San Diego: Plural PublishingInc.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crystal, D. (1984). Linguistic encounters with handicap. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, B. H. (Ed.). (2005). Alzheimer talk, text and context: Enhancing communication. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Drew, P. (2018). Special issue on “Epistemics – The rebuttal”. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  9. Folstein, M., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interaction construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, C., & Kraut, J. (2017). Interactional sociolinguistics. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 3–14). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Guendouzi, J., & Davis, B. H. (2013). Dementia discourse and pragmatics. In B. H. Davis & J. Guendouzi (Eds.), Pragmatics in dementia discourse (pp. 1–28). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Guendouzi, J., & Pate, A. (2014). Interactional and cognitive resources in dementia: A perspective from politeness theory. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 121–146). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, H. E. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, H. E. (1996). Intratextuality, intertextuality, and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer’s disease. Text, 16, 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, H. E. (2003). Glimmers: A journey into Alzheimer’s disease. Ashland: RiverWood Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, H. E. (2004). Symptoms and signs in particular: The influence of the medical condition on the shape of physician-patient talk. Communication & Medicine, 1(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton, H. E. (2005). Epilogue: The prism, the soliloquy, the dance, and the couch – The evolving study of language and Alzheimer’s disease. In B. H. Davis (Ed.), Alzheimer talk, text and context: Enhancing communication (pp. 224–246). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton, H. E. (2008). Language and dementia: Sociolinguistic aspects. C. L. J. de Bot (Ed.). Language and the Brain. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL), 28, 91–110.Google Scholar
  22. Hamilton, H. E. (2011). At the intersection of art, Alzheimer’s disease, and discourse: Talk in the surround of paintings. In P. Backhaus (Ed.), Communication in elderly care: Cross-cultural approaches (pp. 166–192). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton, H. E., & Baffy, M. (2014). Preparing for a theatrical performance: Writing scripts and shaping identities in an early memory loss support group. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 213–244). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction (ROLSI), 45, 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heritage, J. (2018). The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 14–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes, J. (2011). Thinking through dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Husain, M., & Schott, J. M. (2016). Oxford textbook of cognitive neurology and dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398). Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Isaac, A., & Hamilton, H. E. (in press). Agency and epistemic authority in question-answer sequences between art museum guides and visitors diagnosed with dementia. Linguistics Vanguard.Google Scholar
  31. Kempler, D., & Goral, M. (2008). Language and dementia: Neuropsychological aspects. C. L. J. de Bot (Ed.). Language and the Brain. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL), 28, 73–90.Google Scholar
  32. Kindell, J., Keady, J., Sage, K., & Wilkinson, R. (2017). Everyday conversation in dementia: A review of the literature to inform research and practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(4), 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kitwood, T. (1993). Towards a theory of dementia care: The interpersonal process. Ageing and Society, 13, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Leibing, A. (2006). Divided gazes: Alzheimer’s disease, the person within, and death in life. In A. Leibing & L. Cohen (Eds.), Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility (pp. 240–268). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopez de Victoria Rodriguez, P. C. (2016). Narratives of self in older bilingual adults diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (2016). Special issue on “The epistemics of Epistemics”. Discourse Studies, 18(5), 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacPherson, S., Bird, M., Anderson, K., Davis, T., & Blair, A. (2009). An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: ‘You do it for the moment’. Aging & Mental Health, 13(5), 744–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthews, M. (2005). Weaving a life: Five people with early stage dementia share their stories. Unpublished PhD dissertation, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Müller, N., & Schrauf, R. (2014). Conversation as cognition: Reframing cognition in dementia. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 3–26). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nuckolls, J. B., & Michael, L. (2012). Special issue on “Evidentiality in interaction”. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perkins, L., Whitworth, A., & Lesser, R. (1998). Conversing in dementia: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pope, C., & Davis, B. H. (2011). Finding a balance: The Carolina Conversations Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramanathan, V. (1997). Alzheimer discourse: Some sociolinguistic dimensions. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Ravdin, L., & Katzen, H. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook on the neuropsychology of aging and dementia. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rilke, R. M. (1929). Briefe an einen jungen Dichter. Leipzig: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Robinson, J. (2016). Accountability in social interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ryan, E. B., Bannister, K. A., & Anas, A. P. (2009). The dementia narrative: Writing to reclaim social identity. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sabat, S. R. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer’s disease: Life through a tangled veil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1–2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Schrauf, R., & Müller, N. (Eds.). (2014). Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schütz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 13(4), 463–478.Google Scholar
  54. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sidnell, J. (2012). ‘Who knows best?’ Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3, 294–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tannen, D. (2004). Interactional sociolinguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 76–88). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  59. Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Dijk, T. (2006). Introduction: Discourse, interaction, and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Dijk, T. (2013). Special issue on “Epistemic discourse analysis”. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 497–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocultural approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi E. Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations