Advertisement

Reframing Geoethics?

  • Martin BohleEmail author
  • Giuseppe Di Capua
  • Nic Bilham
Chapter

Abstract

Geoethics is an emerging and expanding field which is deepening its philosophical foundations and strengthening its interactions with other disciplines. Such expansion may be in tension with the need for geoethics to be a focused framework to support geoscientists in their work. There is also a risk of ‘geoethics’ being used as a catch-all term for reflection and research when considering human actions within the Earth system. The chapter reflects on how the scope of geoethics might be constrained. It suggests that geoethics might be framed as relating to the practices and values of any human agent as part of the Earth system, whereas the complementary notion of ‘geosophy’ could be used to refer to the broader considerations regarding human–Earth system interactions.

Keywords

Geoethics Earth system Professional responsibilities Anthropogenic global change Geosophy 

References

  1. Blankenship, J. D. (2018). Midcentury Geohumanities: J. B. Jackson and the “Magazine of Human Geography.” GeoHumanities, 4(1), 26–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2017.1386075.
  2. Castree, N., Adams, W. M., Barry, J., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Corbera, E., et al. (2014). Changing the Intellectual Climate. Nature Climate Change, 4(9), 763–768.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339.
  3. Di Capua, G., Peppoloni, S., & Bobrowsky, P. T. (2017). The Cape Town Statement on Geoethics. In Geoethics at the Heart of All Geoscience. Annals of Geophysics, 60(7).  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7553.
  4. Hawkins, H., Cabeen, L., Callard, F., Castree, N., Daniels, S., DeLyser, D., et al. (2015). What Might GeoHumanities Do? Possibilities, Practices, Publics, and Politics. GeoHumanities, 1(2), 211–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2015.1108992.
  5. Holm, P., Adamson, J., Huang, H., Kirdan, L., Kitch, S., McCalman, I., et al. (2015). Humanities for the Environment—A Manifesto for Research and Action. Humanities, 4(4), 977–992.  https://doi.org/10.3390/h4040977.
  6. Mouchang, Y. U. (2011). Geoscience Ethics: Turn of Geoscience Towards Humanism. Journal of Shanghai Normal University [Philosophy & Social Sciences], 3, 5–16.Google Scholar
  7. Peppoloni, S., & Di Capua, G. (2017). Geoethics: Ethical, Social and Cultural Implications in Geosciences. In Geoethics at the Heart of All Geoscience. Annals of Geophysics, 60(7).  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7473.
  8. Shaw, R. (2017). Knowing Homes and Writing Worlds? Ethics of the ‘Eco-’, Ethics of the ‘Geo-’ and How to Light a Planet. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 99(2), 128–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2017.1311469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sörlin, S. (2012). Environmental Humanities: Why Should Biologists Interested in the Environment Take the Humanities Seriously? BioScience, 62(9), 788–789.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. United Nations. (2013). World Social Science Report 2013 (UNESCO, Ed.) (612pp.). Paris: OECD Publishing. ISBN 9789264203419.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-en.
  11. Wright, J. K. (1947). Terrae Incognitae: The Place of the Imagination in Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 37(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Bohle
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Giuseppe Di Capua
    • 3
    • 4
  • Nic Bilham
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Ronin Institute for Independent ScholarshipMontclairUSA
  2. 2.DG RTDEuropean CommissionBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaRomeItaly
  4. 4.International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG)RomeItaly
  5. 5.University of Exeter Business SchoolPenrynUK
  6. 6.Camborne School of MinesUniversity of ExeterPenrynUK

Personalised recommendations