Advertisement

How Modest Tourism Development Becomes Successful: The Complementarity of Tourism in Malå Municipality

  • Linda Lundmark
  • Kajsa G. ÅbergEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Geographies of Tourism and Global Change book series (GTGC)

Abstract

This chapter tells the story of a small inland village in northern Sweden. Historically this area was only home to the Sami population, but with time colonization and the extraction of raw material have changed the conditions radically. This chapter explores the circumstances that have shaped the tourism sector in Malå and discusses how tourism is integrated in the development of the local economy. The geographical location was key to creating wealth from forestry and mining in the past, but this did not create the infrastructure or layers of investments that today are important for economic development in other sectors. However, this study shows that Malå has managed to diversify its historic paths by branching into the new knowledge economy, and the direct dependence on jobs in its primary industry has decreased even though it remains one of several pillars of the local economy. Tourism is seen as a way to further decrease the historic dependence on primary sectors. Municipal officials argue that tourism is to be regarded as a complement and should not be seen as replacing what is already successfully transitioning and developing. Tourism in Malå is predominantly concentrated on the winter season, with weekend return tourists coming mainly from the coastal municipalities. Although it is a major skiing destination in Västerbotten County, second only to Hemavan-Tärnaby in terms of sold ski passes, there are indicators that identification with the traditional resource sectors remains strong among Malå’s inhabitants. However, tourism seems to be a successful local development strategy, given its complementarity to other industries and the realistic expectations based on accurate appraisals of existing conditions for development.

Keywords

Path dependence Path creation Periphery Regional tourism Small-scale seasonal tourism Weekenders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Swedish research council Formas for providing the means to perform this study. Furthermore, the authors’ gratitude extends to the reviewers for their valuable comments for improving the chapter.

References

  1. Almstedt, Å., Brouder, P., Karlsson, S., & Lundmark, L. (2014). Beyond post-productivism: From rural policy discourse to rural diversity. European Countryside, 4, 297–306.  https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, T. D., & Getz, D. (2009). Tourism as a mixed industry: Differences between private, public and not-for-profit festivals. Tourism Management, 30(6), 847–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boström, I. (2017, December 12). Inlandskommuner får betala dyrt för turism (Inland municipalities pay a high price for tourism). Folkbladet. Retrieved December 16, 2017, from https://www.folkbladet.nu/1764397/inlandskommuner-far-betala-dyrt-for-turism.
  5. Bosworth, G., & Farrell, H. (2011). Tourism entrepreneurs in Northumberland. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1474–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2010). Sustainable tourism and the evolving role of government planning. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(1), 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580903338790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouder, P., Karlsson, S., & Lundmark, L. (2015). Hyper-production: A new metric of multifunctionality. European Countryside, 3, 134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2015-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, R. W. (2001). Seasonality in tourism: Issues and implications. In T. Baum & S. Lundtorp (Eds.), Seasonality in tourism (pp. 5–21). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carson, D. A., & Carson, D. B. (2011). Why tourism may not be everybody’s business: The challenge of tradition in resource peripheries. The Rangeland Journal, 33(4), 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Lundmark, L. (2014). Tourism and mobilities in sparsely populated areas: Towards a framework and research agenda. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 14(4), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson, D. B., Carson, D. A., Nordin, G., & Sköld, P. (2016). Lessons from the Arctic past: The resource cycle, hydro energy development, and the human geography of Jokkmokk, Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, 16, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christaller, W. (1963). Some considerations of tourism locations in Europe: The peripheral regions—under development countries—recreation areas. Regional Science Associations, 12, 95–105.Google Scholar
  14. Church, A., & Coles, T. (2006). Tourism, power and space. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & van Oort, F. G. (2017). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx001.
  16. Findlay, A. M., Short, D., & Stockdale, A. (2000). The labour-market impact of migration to rural areas. Applied Geography, 20(4), 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flagestad, A., & Hope, C. A. (2001). Strategic success in winter sports destinations: A sustainable value creation perspective. Tourism Management, 22, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2011). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, 76(4), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grängsjö, P. (2006). Om organisering av turism: studier av turismens samarbetsorganisationer i Sverige [About organizing tourism: studies of tourism cooperation organizations in Sweden]. Företagsekonomiska Institutionen, Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs universitet. Göteborg/V 2006:17. Östersund: European Tourism Research Institute ETOUR.Google Scholar
  20. Gunn, C. A. (1994). Tourism planning: Basics, concepts, cases. Washington: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, C. M. (1994). Tourism and politics: Policy power and place. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, C. M. (2005). The social science of mobility. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, C. M. (2007). North-south perspectives on tourism, regional development and peripheral areas. In D. K. Müller & B. Jansson (Eds.), Tourism in peripheries: Perspectives from the far north and south (pp. 19–37). Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, C. M., & Jenkins, J. M. (1998). The policy dimensions of rural tourism and recreation. In R. Butler, C. M. Hall, & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Tourism and recreation in rural areas (pp. 19–42). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Ilbery, B. (1998). The geography of rural change. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Joppe, M. (2012). Migrant workers: Challenges and opportunities in addressing tourism labour shortages. Tourism Management, 33(3), 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knobblock, E. A., & Pettersson, Ö. (2010). Restructuring and risk-reduction in mining: Employment implications for northern Sweden. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 188(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
  28. Komppula, R. (2014). The role of individual entrepreneurs in the development of competitiveness for a rural tourism destination: A case study. Tourism Management, 40, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larsson, M. (2008). Turismstrategi saknas: Men är den efterlyst? En studie av behovet av en turismstrategi för Malå kommun [Tourism Strategy missing: But is it wanted? A study of the need for a tourism strategy for Malå municipality]. Student essay, level C Human geography, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  30. Lundgren, J. O. (1982). The tourist frontier of Nouveau Quebec: Functions and regional linkages. The Tourism Review, 37(2), 10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ebo57856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundmark, L. (1998). Så länge vi har marker: samerna och staten under sexhundra år. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
  32. Lundmark, L. (2006). Restructuring and employment change in sparsely populated areas. Examples from Northern Sweden and Finland. GERUM, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  33. Lundmark, L., & Pettersson, Ö. (2012). The relevance of cluster initiatives in rural areas: Regional policy in Sweden. Urbani Izziv, 23(supp. 1), 42–52.  https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-1-004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Margaryan, L. (2016). Nature as a commercial setting: The case of nature-based tourism providers in Sweden. Current issues in Tourism, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1232378.
  35. McCarthy, J. (2005). Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies—reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography, 29(6), 773–782.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph584pr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moss, L. A. G. (Ed.). (2006). The amenity migrants. Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
  37. Müller, D. K. (2005). Second home tourism in the Swedish mountain range. In C. M. Hall & S. W. Boyd (Eds.), Nature-based tourism in peripheral areas: Development or disaster? (pp. 133–151). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Müller, D. K., & Jansson, B. (2007). The difficult business of making pleasure peripheries prosperous: Perspectives on space, place and environment. In D. K. Müller & B. Jansson (Eds.), Tourism in peripheries: Perspectives from the far north and south (pp. 3–18). Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Östhol, A., & Svensson, B. (2002a). Introduction. In A. Östhol & B. Svensson (Eds.), Partnership responses—regional governance in the Nordic states (pp. 13–22). Stockholm: Nordregio.Google Scholar
  40. Östhol, A., & Svensson, B. (2002b). Conclusions on regional partnership in institutional change in the Nordic area. In A. Östhol & B. Svensson (Eds.), Partnership responses—regional governance in the Nordic states (pp. 235–255). Stockholm: Nordregio.Google Scholar
  41. Prideaux, B. (2002). Building visitor attractions in peripheral areas: Can uniqueness overcome isolation to produce viability? International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(5), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmallegger, D., & Carson, D. (2010). Is tourism just another staple? A new perspective on tourism in remote regions. Current Issues in Tourism, 13(3), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skellefte Regionen. (2015). Turistisk samverkan längs Skellefteå Älvdal: En tillgänglig och attraktiv besöksregion [Collaboration in tourism along the Skellefteå river: an accessible and attractive destination]. Skellefte Regionen. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from https://www.sorsele.se/media/1282/strategi_turistisk_samverkan_l_ngs_skellefte___lvdal.pdf.
  44. Statistics Sweden. (2017). Statistical database. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se.
  45. Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European urban and regional studies, 2(3), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Svensson, B., Nordin, S., & Flagestad, A. (2006). Destination governance and contemporary development models. In L. Lazeretti & C. S. Petrillo (Eds.), Tourism local systems and networking (pp. 83–95). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thulemark, M., Lundmark, M., & Heldt-Cassel, S. (2014). Tourism employment and creative in-migrants. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 14(4), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullman, L. E. (1956). The role of transportation and the bases for interaction. In W. L. Thomas (Ed.), Man’s role in changing the face of the earth (pp. 862–880). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, G. A., & Rigg, J. (2003). ‘Post-productivist’ agricultural regimes and the South: Discordant concepts? Progress in Human Geography, 27(6), 681–707.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph450oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woods, M. (2011). Rural. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations