What Is a ‘Digital Family’?

  • Sakari TaipaleEmail author


This chapter introduces the concept of the digital family. Digital families are one form of distributed extended families, consisting of related individuals living in one or more households who utilize at least basic level information and communication technologies and social media applications to stay connected and maintain a sense of unity. The strengths and limitations of the notion are discussed, assessing its usefulness vis-à-vis neighbouring concepts. The chapter ends with the discussion of the perception of family in the three countries studied, Finland, Italy and Slovenia, and of the differences found between them.


Digital family Distributed family Extended family Information and communication technology Network family Social media 


  1. Bennett, L., Wolin, S., & McAvity, K. (1988). Family identity, ritual, and myth: A cultural perspective on life cycle transitions. In C. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions (pp. 211–234). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Borell, K. (2003). Family and household: Family research and multi-household families. International Review of Sociology, 13(3), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browne, K. (2005). An Introduction to Sociology (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cáceres, R. B., & Chaparro, A. C. (2017). Age for learning, age for teaching: The role of inter-generational, intra-household learning in internet use by older adults in Latin America. Information, Communication and Society, 22(2), 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, T. H. (2009). ‘Connected presence’ in distributed family life. New Media & Society, 11(3), 433–451.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciabattari, T. (2016). Sociology of families: Change, continuity, and diversity. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cirman, A. (2006). Housing tenure preferences in the post-privatisation period: The case of Slovenia. Housing studies, 21(1), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comunello, F., Fernández Ardèvol, M., Mulargia, S., & Belotti, F. (2017). Women, youth and everything else: Age-based and gendered stereotypes in relation to digital technology among elderly Italian mobile phone users. Media, Culture and Society, 39(6), 798–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2008). Family identity: A framework of identity interplay in consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eurostat. (2015). People in the EU—Who are we and how do we live? Statistical book. Retrieved from–_who_are_we_and_how_do_we_live%3F.
  11. Eurostat. (2017). Digital economy and society statistics—Households and individuals. Retrieved from
  12. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamill, L. (2011). Changing times: Home life and domestic habit. In R. Harper (Ed.), The connected home: The future of domestic life (pp. 29–57). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harper, R. (2011). From smart home to connected home. In R. Harper (Ed.), The connected home: The future of domestic life (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S., Leduc, N., Hagström, A., Bayley, O. (2001). Casablanca: Designing social communication devices for the home. In ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2001 (pp. 325–332). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., …, Eiderback, B. (2003). Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 17–24). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jokinen, K. (2014). Families and family policies in finland: A future scenario. Gender Studies and Policy Review, 7, 36–54. Google Scholar
  20. Judge, T. K., Neustaedter, C., & Harrison, S. (2013). Inter-family messaging with domestic media spaces. In C. Neustaedter, T. Harrison, & A. Sellen (Eds.), Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy, T., L., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from
  22. Kennedy, T. L., & Wellman, B. (2007). The networked household. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuoppamäki, S.-M., Taipale, S., & Wilska, T.-A. (2017). The use of mobile technology for online shopping and entertainment among older adults in Finland. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuoppamäki, S.-M., Wilska, T.-A., & Taipale, S. (2017). Ageing and consumption in Finland: The effect of age and life course stage on ecological, economical and self-indulgent consumption among late middle-agers and young adults between 1999 and 2014. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(4), 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamish, D. (Ed.). (2013). The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Lasen, A. (2004). Affective technologies—Emotions and mobile phones. Receiver, Vodaphone, 11. Retrieved from
  27. Lim, S. S. (Ed.). (2016). Mobile communication and the family. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, C. I. C., Tang, W.-H., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2012). “Mommy want to learn the computer”: How middle-aged and elderly women in Taiwan learn ICT through social support. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindley, S., Harper, R., & Sellen, A. (2010). Designing a technological playground: a field study of the emergence of play in household messaging. In Conference on Human Factors in computing Systems 2010 (pp. 2351–2360). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  30. Little, L., Sillence, E., & Briggs, P. (2009). Ubiquitous systems and the family: Thoughts about the networked home. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (pp. 6–9). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  31. Litwak, E. (1960). Occupational mobility and extended family cohesion. American Sociological Review, 25(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the internet. Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  34. Luijkx, K., Peek, S., & Wouters, E. (2015). “Grandma, you should do it—it’s cool”: Older adults and the role of family members in their acceptance of technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(12), 15470–15485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mandić, S. (2001). Residential mobility versus ‘in-place’ adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society ‘in transition’. Housing Studies, 16(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moffatt, K., David, J., & Baecker, R. M. (2013). Connecting grandparents and grandchildren. In C. Neustaedter, T. Harrison, & A. Sellen (Eds.), Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life (pp. 173–193). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mori, K., & Harada, E. T. (2010). Is learning a family matter?: Experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones. Japanese Psychological Research, 52(3), 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neustaedter, C., Harrison, T., & Sellen, A. (Eds.) (2013). Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Oksman, V., & Turtiainen, J. (2004). Mobile communication as a social stage: Meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media & Society, 6(3), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oláh, L. S. (2015, May). Changing families in the European Union: Trends and policy implications. In United Nations Expert Group Meeting “Family policy development: Achievements and challenges” in New York, May (pp. 14–15).Google Scholar
  42. Olivier, P., & Wallace, J. (2009). Digital technologies and the emotional family. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piumatti, G., Garro, M., Pipitone, L., Di Vita, A. M., & Rabaglietti, E. (2016). north/south differences among italian emerging adults regarding criteria deemed important for adulthood and life satisfaction. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siibak, A., & Tamme, V. (2013). ‘Who introduced granny to Facebook?’: An exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern Lights: Film & media studies Yearbook, 11(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (2012). Handbook of children and the media. London: Sage.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Taipale, S., Petrovčič, A., & Dolničar, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: Empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families. In S. Taipale, T.-A. Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 68–86). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taipale, S., Wilska, T.-A., & Gilleard, C. (Eds.). (2018b). Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Tsai, T. H., Ho, Y. L., & Tseng, K. (2011). An investigation into the social network between three generations in a household: bridging the interrogational gaps between the senior and the youth. In Online Communities and Social Computing (pp. 277–286). 4th International Conference, OCSC 2011, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Venkatesh, A., Dunkle, D., & Wortman, A. (2011). Family life, children and the feminization of computing. In R. Harper (Ed.), The connected home: The future of domestic life (pp. 59–76). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Venkatesh, A., Kruse, E., & Shih, E. (2003). The networked home: An analysis of current development and future trends. Cognition, Technology & Work, 5(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  53. Vincent, J. (2006). Emotional attachment and mobile phones. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 19(1), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vincent, J., & Fortunati, L. (Eds.). (2009). Electronic emotion, the mediation of emotion via information and communication technologies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations