• Sakari TaipaleEmail author


In this chapter, the overall topic of the book and its rationale are introduced to the reader. The book develops an argument about the rise of digital families and examines how such families use different technologies to their diverse ends. Today, the lives of both their youngest and adult members are already highly ‘connected’ via portable and personal communication technologies. However, it is only now that the oldest family members are getting ready to engage in digital and online family interactions. The introduction ends with the presentation of the structure of the book.


Digital family Extended family Family solidarity Generations Information and communication technology Linked lives Technology adoption 


  1. Anderson, M., & Perrin, A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  2. Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elder, G. H. (1994). Time, human aging and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elder, G. H., & Kirkpatrick Johnson, M. (2003). The life course and aging: Challenges, lessons, and new directions. In R. A. Settersten (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 48–81). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2008). Family identity: A framework of identity interplay in consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EuroStat. (2017). Digital economy and society statistics—Households and individuals. Retrieved from
  11. Fortunati, L., & Taipale, S. (2017). Mobilities and the network of personal technologies: Refining the understanding of mobility structure. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting: Abandon your anxieties and be a good parent. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., & Korhonen, A. (2018). Refamilisation in the broadband society—the effects of ICTs on family solidarity in Finland. Journal of Family Studies. Retrieved from
  15. Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy, T. L. M., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, T., & Wellman, B. (2007). The networked household. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  19. Ling, R. & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In K. Katz & M. Aakhus, M. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer Internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pew Research Center. (2017). A third of Americans live in a household with three or more smartphones. Retrieved from
  23. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Statistics Finland. (2017). Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT): Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö. Retrieved from
  26. Taipale, S. (2016). Do the mobile-rich get richer? Internet use, travelling, and social differentiations in Finland. New Media & Society, 18(1), 44–61.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taipale, S., & Farinosi, M. (2018). The big meaning of small messages: The use of WhatsApp in intergenerational family communication. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population 2018 (pp. 532–546)., Lecture Notes in Computer Science Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Taipale, S., Petrovčič, A., & Dolničar, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: Empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families. In S. Taipale, T.-A. Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 68–86). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taipale, S., Wilska, T.-A., & Gilleard, C. (Eds.). (2018). Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life cours. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Tammelin, M., & Anttila, T. (2017). Mobile life of middle aged employees: Fragmented time and softer schedules. In S. Taipale, T.-A. Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational Identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 55–68). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsai, T. H., Ho, Y. L., & Tseng, K. (2011). An investigation into the social network between three generations in a household: bridging the interrogational gaps between the senior and the youth. In Online Communities and Social Computing (pp. 277–286). 4th International Conference, OCSC 2011. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic books.Google Scholar
  33. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wellman, B., Quan‐Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I. & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 8(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilska, T.-A. & Kuoppamäki, S. (2018). Necessities to all? The role of ICTs in the everyday life of the middle-aged and elderly between 1999 and 2014. In S. Taipale, T.-A. Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 149–166). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations