Advertisement

Enhanced Assessment Approaches in Immersive Environments

Meeting Competency-Oriented Requirements in the Classroom
  • Joachim MadererEmail author
  • Johanna Pirker
  • Christian Gütl
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)

Abstract

The broader availability of high-tech devices enables the research and application of enhanced and novel teaching technologies in STEM education, such as 3D learning environments. Also, automated assessment and guidance mechanisms should be considered that meet the requirements of modern competency-oriented curricula and support teachers in the classroom. In this paper, we investigate the current adoption of digital assessment tools and simulations, how teachers and research experts assess students in competency-oriented learning settings and present an extended conceptual architecture for flexible automated assessment in immersive environments. First results indicate that basic e-assessment techniques are still not fully prevalent in secondary education, but most teachers have expressed interest in simulations with automated assessment features.

Keywords

Assessment Immersive environments Physics education Competences STEM education 

References

  1. 1.
    Pirker, J., Lesjak, I., Gütl, C.: An educational physics laboratory in mobile versus room scale virtual reality–a comparative study. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 13, 106 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v13i08.7371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibáñez, M.B., Crespo, R.M., Kloos, C.D.: Assessment of knowledge and competencies in 3d virtual worlds: a proposal. In: Reynolds, N., Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (eds.) Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society, pp. 165–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_16
  3. 3.
    Crisp, G.: E-assessment that enhances graduateness and employability skills. In: Coetzee, M., Botha, J.A., Eccles, N., Nienaber, H., Holzhausen, N. (eds.) Developing Student Graduateness and Employability, pp. 529–548 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spector, J.M.: Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learn. Environ. 1(1), 1–10 (2014). http://www.slejournal.com/content/pdf/s40561-014-0002-7.pdf
  5. 5.
    Nicol, D., Milligan, C.: Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. Innov. Assess. High. Educ. 64–77 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Méhaut, P., Winch, C.: The European qualification framework: skills, competences or knowledge? Eur. Educ. Res. J. 11(3), 369–381 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haagen, C., Hopf, M.: Standardization in physics–first steps in the Austrian educational system. In: E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science learning and Citizenship (2012). https://www.esera.org/publications/esera-conference-proceedings/esera-2011
  8. 8.
    Maderer, J., Gütl, C., Al-Smadi, M.: Formative assessment in immersive environments: a semantic approach to automated evaluation of user behavior in open wonderland. In: Proceedings of Immersive Education (iED) Summit (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maderer, J., Gütl, C. (2013). Flexible automated assessment in 3D learning environments: Technical improvements and expert feedback. In E-iED 2013 Proceedings of the 3rd European Immersive Education Summit (pp. 100–110)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shute, V.J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., Moore, G.: Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 106–117 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greuel, C., Denker, G., Myers, K.: Semantic Instrumentation of Virtual Environments for Training (2017). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4758/97c345d490c35d86359d4051da551c71b5d0.pdf
  12. 12.
    Greuel, C., Myers, K., Denker, G., Gervasio, M.: Assessment and content authoring in semantic virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D.: Micro-adaptivity: protecting immersion in didactically adaptive digital educational games. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(2), 95–105 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masses and Springs: PhET Interactive Simulations. https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/mass-spring-lab/mass-spring-lab_en.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Maderer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johanna Pirker
    • 1
  • Christian Gütl
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations